David Brooks is Upset that the Politicians Are Listening to Voters

[Hannah Bell]

David Brooks told readers that he is very upset. It seems that even though the Social Security and Medicare cutters have spent tens of millions of dollars pushing their agenda, the politicians still are unlikely to act.

Of course the facts are very clear. There is no truth to the whining about out of control government spending. According to the Congressional Budget Office, non-interest federal spending was 18.8 percent of GDP in 1980. In 2020 it is projected to be 18.6 percent of GDP.

The story of Social Security impoverishing our children is just a fairy tale intended to scare little kids. According to the Congressional Budget Office it can pay all benefits through the year 2039 with no changes whatsoever. If the projected shortfall over its 75-year planning period was closed entirely with an increase in the payroll tax (as opposed to raising the cap and/or using other taxes) it would offset the projected increase in in real wages over about an 18 month period. That doesn't quite fit the story of child abuse that the deficit hawks like to push.

And of course the whole long-term deficit nightmare story is driven entirely by our broken health care system. If per person health care costs in the United States were the same as in any of the wealthy countries with longer life expectancies we would be looking at huge budget surpluses, not deficits.

But that leaves Mr. Brooks hugely disappointed. After all, the Wall Street gang spent a huge amount of money and effort to build up the current drumbeat for cuts to these key programs. In addition to the commissions, they have essentially enlisted the Washington Post and National Public Radio and other media outlets as full time cheerleaders in this effort, abandoning any pretext of journalistic objectivity. If all this effort goes to waste, how they ever going to take these benefits away from the middle class?

http://www.cepr.net/index.php/blogs/beat-the-press/david-brooks-is-upset-that-the-politicians-are-listening-to-voters#comments

[lob1]

1. The pols should listen to the voters for a change.

That would be refreshing.

[Common Sense Party]

2. Should pols listen to tea party voters? n/t

[Commie Pinko Dirtbag]

3. Yes, and then conclude what they say is bullshit. -nt

[Supersedeas]

4. And not a peek about OUT OF CONTROL Military Spending -- the Elephant is more than a RW symbol

[hfojvt]

5. nicely summed up by Dean Baker

[maryf]

6. K&R nt