Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Federal Highway Administration Is Ordering All Local Governments to Buy New Street Signs

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
somone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 05:31 PM
Original message
Federal Highway Administration Is Ordering All Local Governments to Buy New Street Signs
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/local-governments-told-buy-street-signs/story?id=12256322

READ THIS: Local Governments Told to Buy New Street Signs
Federal Highway Administration Is Ordering Local Governments to Buy New Street Signs That They Say Are Easier to Read
By JONATHAN KARL

The federal government says THIS is harder to read than This. Got that? ALL CAPS are bad. Mixed Case is Good. It's just one reason the Federal Highway Administration is ordering all local governments -- from the tiniest towns to the largest cities -- to go out and buy new street signs that federal bureaucrats say are easier to read.

The rules are part of a tangle of regulations included in the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices. The 800-plus page book tells local governments they should: increase the size of the letters on street signs from the current 4 inches to 6 inches on all roads with speed limits over 25 miles per hour - the target date for this to be completed is January 2012; install signs with new reflective letters more visible at night by January 2018; and whenever street name signs are changed for any reason, they can no longer be in ALL CAPS.

In Milwaukee this will cost the cash-strapped city nearly $2 million -- double the city's entire annual for traffic control. In Dinwiddie County, Virginia -- with lots of roads but not many people -- the cost comes to about $10 for every man, woman and child. "The money is better spent on education, or the sheriff's department or on public safety than something like that," said Harrison Moody, chairman of the Dinwiddie Board of Supervisors. Many local residents in Dinwiddie say their current street signs work just fine, and they see no reason to change them. "There are a lot of people out there that are hungry," said Dinwiddie resident Thomas Davis. "Why spend on street signs when everybody can read a street sign or, if you don't know where you're going, get a GPS."...

Whether or not requiring cities and towns to replace all their street signs improves safety, it would undoubtedly be a windfall for the multi-billion-dollar-a-year sign industry. The American Traffic Safety Services Association -- which represents companies that make signs and the reflective material used on them -- lobbied hard for the new rules. And at least one key study used to justify the changes was funded by the 3M Corporation, one of the few companies that make the reflective material now required on street signs.

-------------------------------------------------------------------

It's about time our crappy roads and bridges get brand new shiny signs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. A clever way to get the economy going????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TNLib Donating Member (683 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. Sounds like Graft to me
I'm willing to bet that someone is getting kick backs or major campaign contributions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. I would bet you are correct.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. The libertarian point of view starts to make more and more sense.
I am waiting for a law that says that all adults over the age of fifty have to wear adult diapers.

Yet another way to bring some money to the industrialists, while doing nothing really constructive at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcane1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. Some clarification:
The conflation of regulations regarding these two new types of standards for signage - retroreflectivity and mixed case lettering - has created the impression that all states must change every street name sign to used mixed case lettering by the year 2015 (at considerable cost to those states). This impression is false. The only connection between these two standards is that if states have to replace some of their street name signs to meet the new retroreflectivity standards (which they are required to do by 2018), then those replacement signs must use mixed case lettering. Otherwise, there is currently no requirement that states remove and replace street name signs which use only upper case lettering — such signs may remain in place until they reach the end of their service lives.


http://www.snopes.com/politics/traffic/mixedcase.asp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PeaceNikki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Thank you for that clarification.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. As usual the media gets it wrong. I bet it was intentional.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
taught_me_patience Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 05:38 PM
Original message
The old "broken window fallacy"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PeaceNikki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
4. "The new regulations, which were written under the Bush Administration..."
An important point not to be missed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WHEN CRABS ROAR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
5. Now i'm beginning to see. Pun intended.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PoliticAverse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
7. New signs...


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
10. I have been in the drawing field for more than 30 years
We always use caps on drawings. Hell, when I write, I use all caps, it is a hazard of the trade and I have not actually drawn anything for nearly 10 years.

But even in the CAD world, all uppercase is preferred method for annotating a drawing.

I guess maybe that is why I don't have any problems reading the damn street signs.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paper Roses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
11. Stupid waste of money. Do these people have a brain?
The food pantries are bare, towns are out of money. Every other house is for sale, people have no jobs. Teachers have to bring their own supplies, kids also have to bring their own necessities too.
I could make a list a mile long. There are a thousand things more important than new street signs.

Maybe for the sign industry...that is the only business that would benefit. Don't tell me this is a good thing for anyone else..

Geeze, what a bunch of jerks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PeaceNikki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. It's a bad story. Read the clarification.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old Troop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-10 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
13. How does the Federal government have the power to order local
authorities to do this? I'm really asking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC