Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Let's face it, people; this administration isn't interested in creating jobs.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Joe Fields Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 12:23 AM
Original message
Let's face it, people; this administration isn't interested in creating jobs.


Obama had a ton of good will on his side a couple of years ago. He knew what the people wanted. He knew what the people needed.

But instead, he catered to the corporatists, whose money and influence propelled him into the White House. He's had two years to develop a jobs program. He hasn't done it. That fact alone looms the largest in the election swing earlier this month.

Over two million Americans will lose their unemployment benefits this holiday season. But Mr. Obama, don't you get it yet? While these good hard working Americans need those extensions in their unemployment, what will save this country is JOBS, dammit.

Do this country a huge favor, Mr. Obama. Quit bending over for this nation's richest few and devise a program that will put America back to work.

I have little hope left that this will happen. The evidence to the contrary is too clear for me. But if you don't, then only God knows what the end consequences might be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
flvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 12:28 AM
Response to Original message
1. You still think he cares?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #1
42. That is laughable, isn't it?
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #1
43. Not at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Fields Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
47. Depends on how you define caring.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 12:29 AM
Response to Original message
2. congress pass laws not the President. What jobs do you propose?
If the Congress doesn't pass an extension then one won't get passed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 12:36 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. Economists are warning his freezing of Federal pay will decrease jobs
In Colorado, today, the news reports I heard were underscoring this projected impact on the economy and slowdown of any new job development.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 01:01 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. Federal jobs.....even most State & local governments are cutting or laying off....
they been begging 40yr employess to leave/retire in NY State, but some didn't so the bottom gets laid off or jobs are just abolished. Every dept took a hit.

I guess it depend which economist is being paid...

"The federal government, when you look on average, they make about 50 percent higher wages than the state of Utah than they do the overall state average," says Utah Dept. of Workforce Services chief economist, Mark Knold.

Knold says the government workers already have a relatively high pay rate, which is reason for the pay freeze proposal.

http://www.fox13now.com/news/local/kstu-fed-pay-freeze-utah-workers,0,4633995.story

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 01:05 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. You are arguing a tangential issue.
But, since you simply want to attack economists, rather than their viewpoint, forget it. I don't buy into that kind of tactic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 01:31 AM
Response to Reply #11
17. OMFG. Yet another DUer pushing that RW meme.
Them gubmint workers make too much!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 02:14 AM
Response to Reply #17
20. I'm retired from the goverment...R U.went 3 yrs sometimes w/o a raise.
Edited on Tue Nov-30-10 02:41 AM by Historic NY
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 03:02 AM
Response to Reply #17
29. yes... it makes me want to spit nails.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 01:46 AM
Response to Reply #6
18. Why would the freezing of Federal pay decrease jobs?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 02:35 AM
Response to Reply #18
21. By taking $28bn out of the economy.
Money going into people's paychecks is money that is spent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 02:40 AM
Response to Reply #21
23. The $28bn is not there today.
How can you take something out that isn't there. It doesn't exist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 02:51 AM
Response to Reply #23
25. Which could be said about every proposed spending program. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 02:59 AM
Response to Reply #25
27. Frankly I would rather see
that money go to the unemployed whose benefits are set to run out. That is where the money is desperately needed, and surely would be spent in ways which are critical to those individuals and it would help the economy as well.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 03:04 AM
Response to Reply #27
30. False choice. And a foolish one.
We could very well end up with this federal wage freeze, no UI extension, and a continuation of Bush's tax cuts to the rich.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 03:08 AM
Response to Reply #30
31. How so?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 03:12 AM
Response to Reply #31
32. I just told you.
First off, I haven't seen any assurance that the money saved from the wage freeze will be applied to extended UI benefits. Even if that's the case, it's no assurance that Republicans and Conserva-Dems will assent to the UI extension.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #30
54. Not to mention cuts to Social Security.
But then neoliberals really aren't interested in welfare (it doesn't mean what most have been programmed to believe it means) economics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 03:18 AM
Response to Reply #23
34. Think of it as gasoline
The economy is a car. The wages are the gasoline that fuels the economy (spending). You have so much gasoline now, so who care how much we need tomorrow? Do you see the problem yet? Lack of planning on your part can simply drive the car into a ditch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 03:01 AM
Response to Reply #18
28. Because of the impact on spending in the economy...
areas where there are many Federal workers, it will make a dent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #2
41. Remember when Obama went on TV and DEMANDED that Congress not tax taxpayer funded bankster bonuses?
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
52. Then he ought not to speak of them. "Green jobs", blah de blah blah.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 12:30 AM
Response to Original message
3. Clinton was a micromanager to a great extent-- in many areas
I fear that either Obama has tuned out, ignoring his principles and instincts, or he has delegated to asshole idiot advisors who view this all as one big game (and one that they have no clue how to "win".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 12:48 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. Nah, I think he's just fulfilling commitments made in Toronto. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 12:32 AM
Response to Original message
4. He created jobs in my town. Yours too.
You probably don't recognize many of them because much of the money is funneled through state and local governments and private contractors. One of those jobs was the person who did the energy audit on my house. Another was several road projects in my area.

The best jobs program is to pass a clean energy bill and put people to work building our new energy infrastructure. Obama pushed for it and the Senate blocked it. Have you called your Senators about that yet? They should be voting on it during the lame duck session.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 12:33 AM
Response to Original message
5. There are people in my town working on high speed rail projects right now.
Thanks Obama!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 12:46 AM
Response to Original message
7. K & R nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
regnaD kciN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 12:49 AM
Response to Original message
9. Uh...the stimulus he put through created THREE MILLION jobs...
Let's face it, people; some here can only see a glass that isn't 100% full as totally empty. :eyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Fields Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 01:01 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. What I see is a need for a WPA style program.
Three million jobs, supposedly? Yet unemployment (true unemployment is around 15%?)

The glass isn't even one fifth of the way full, and his allegiances cannot be denied, but I'm sure you will try.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoseGaspar Donating Member (391 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 01:11 AM
Response to Reply #9
14. Not even the White House claims that...

The word was "saved", not "created". 1.7 million jobs "saved" would have been a better estimate. But, let's not quibble. Let's make it 3 million and let's assume that all would have been lost without the Stim. That would make the glass one seventh full (the OP was much too kind to your comment).

Now, let's try that again:

"...some here can only see a glass that is 14% full as totally empty."

Really?

How unreasonable...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 02:02 AM
Response to Reply #14
19. Yes,
there is a significant difference between saving jobs and creating jobs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 02:56 AM
Response to Reply #14
26. Careful, he made rolly eyes.
:eyes:

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #26
44. ...
:spray: :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w8liftinglady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #14
57. -Unfortunately,the job creation...at least in my area-is minimum-wage jobs/no benefits
all manufacturing jobs have been outsourced.farming/ranching cut WAY down.State/County jobs bare-boned.
Military/prison system/fast food/healthcare for the overwhelming number of uninsured...take your pick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liquorice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 01:08 AM
Response to Original message
13. I can't help but be worried about losing the WH in two years. We can't afford
a republican president. It will be a nightmare of Raygun proportions. I hope Obama wakes up soon and grows a spine. Capitulating to the right-wing is going to get us nowhere. He needs to get an FU attitude toward them and set a much stronger course and agenda. I don't understand why he doesn't seem to see that you cannot negotiate with these people; they are psychopaths.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Fields Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 01:26 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. Did you ever see the made for T.V. movie "V"?
If not, look it up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liquorice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 01:30 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. I haven't seen the movie, but the ABC series, "V" is great. I think it's based on the movie. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #15
55. Loved it, even bought the dvds.
How does the remake compare?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eilen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #13
36. I hope the President wakes up some day and remembers he's a Democrat. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #36
40. I hope millions of other people wake the hell up and REALIZE THAT HE'S NOT
If this party is to have any future, besides being the Team Republican's JV squad, it has to start thinking Beyond Obama right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #40
45. !!!
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #40
56. Yep. And if it doesn't, then we do. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blindpig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #13
50. How much difference could it make?

Really? Everything of substance that this administration does has been to the benefit of the ruling class. He ain't gonna tell them to fuck off, they are essentially on the same page, apparent differences are mere jockeying and display. The entire political class is our enemy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Safetykitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 02:38 AM
Response to Original message
22. Ah, we now have arrived at the moment of zen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 02:42 AM
Response to Original message
24. I don't even think he cares about saving his own job
two years from now. :-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
somone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #24
49. Why should he?
The guy's all set for life. A very lucrative and rewarding career is waiting for him no matter what. Plus, he's already got the Nobel Prize in his pocket, so he won't have to do a thing to prove himself anymore (unlike Carter or Clinton).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 03:16 AM
Response to Original message
33. The American worker needs the security of a job, not a temporary unemployment benefit that
Edited on Tue Nov-30-10 03:17 AM by dkf
Gets kicked around like the political football that it is.

It beats me why a person who gets their unemployment extended would blow those funds on Christmas presents. To me it is ridiculous to suggest that an unemployed person who is at the mercy of a Republican congress should even think about buying unnecessary crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eilen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #33
37. Maybe the unemployed person would like to not to be homeless this Christmas. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #37
38. Some bozo on TV was saying we need to keep up unemployment benefits
So people can spend money on Christmas presents.

Wouldn't you admit that is a stupid thing to say?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w8liftinglady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #33
51. what bothers me is the hiring frenzy before Christmas,only to be laid off in jan
now,as far as the unemployed buying presents...
Having had 2 kids at home while on disablity,it's hard to toally ignore Christmas,especially when you know they have suffered right along with you.A parent guilt trip.My kids are each getting one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 03:40 AM
Response to Original message
35. Have you sent this letter to Obama? I doubt that he reads DU. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L0oniX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
39. O yes they are ...in India.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edweird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
46. He has explicitly stated as much. He dirted on FDR and touted the private sector.
More than just a little 'Reaganesque'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Individualist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
48. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
53. Tons of jobs out there waiting but the GOPers say NO to EVERYTHING
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC