unhappycamper note: Since the ‘Pentagon’ (DoD? Gannett?) has ‘requested’ that I only post one paragraph from articles on Army Times, and Airforce Times, To keep in that same (new) tradition, I will also do the same for for articles on Navy Times, Marine Corps Times, stripes.com and military.com.
To read the article in the military's own words, you will need to click the link.
Read all about Fair Use here. It sure is beginning to smell like fascism.
unhappycamper summary of this article: I'm speechless. $243 million dollars for this POS and now we find out the engines are too large to fit in cargo doors?
Gimmeafuckingbreak. Lose this loser.
The first F-35C Lightning II carrier variant arrived Nov. 6 at Naval Air Station Patuxent River, Md. Officials say the aircraft's engine is too large to be transported to sea by normal means.JSF engine too big for regular transport at seaBy William H. McMichael - Staff writer
Posted : Monday Nov 29, 2010 21:14:55 EST
However, the F-35C’s Pratt & Whitney F135 engine, contained in its Engine Shipping System, is too large for the cargo door on a standard carrier onboard delivery plane and for the V-22 tilt-rotor aircraft, the program office acknowledged in a response to a follow-on query from Navy Times. The engine can be broken down into five component parts, but just its power module and packaging alone won’t fit into the COD or the V-22.