Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

More Stupid Shit: Navy Is Having Problems Shipping Engines For F-35 Fighters

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 07:28 AM
Original message
More Stupid Shit: Navy Is Having Problems Shipping Engines For F-35 Fighters
unhappycamper note: Since the ‘Pentagon’ (DoD? Gannett?) has ‘requested’ that I only post one paragraph from articles on Army Times, and Airforce Times, To keep in that same (new) tradition, I will also do the same for for articles on Navy Times, Marine Corps Times, stripes.com and military.com.
To read the article in the military's own words, you will need to click the link.

Read all about Fair Use here. It sure is beginning to smell like fascism.

unhappycamper summary of this article: I'm speechless. $243 million dollars for this POS and now we find out the engines are too large to fit in cargo doors?

Gimmeafuckingbreak. Lose this loser.






The first F-35C Lightning II carrier variant arrived Nov. 6 at Naval Air Station Patuxent River, Md. Officials say the aircraft's engine is too large to be transported to sea by normal means.


JSF engine too big for regular transport at sea
By William H. McMichael - Staff writer
Posted : Monday Nov 29, 2010 21:14:55 EST

However, the F-35C’s Pratt & Whitney F135 engine, contained in its Engine Shipping System, is too large for the cargo door on a standard carrier onboard delivery plane and for the V-22 tilt-rotor aircraft, the program office acknowledged in a response to a follow-on query from Navy Times. The engine can be broken down into five component parts, but just its power module and packaging alone won’t fit into the COD or the V-22.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
oneshooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 08:37 AM
Response to Original message
1.  Simple fix. Use a C-130 as a COD.
It has been done before, no need to alter the aircraft.

http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=c-130+carrier+landing&aq=f

Oneshooter
Armed and Livin in Texas
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bosso 63 Donating Member (759 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Amazing video, but it didn't look very simple to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oneshooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. There were some 16 landings and takeoffs
on the USS Forrestal (CV 59) with a 1063ft deck. The newer carriers have a 1,092ft long flight deck that is 30ft wider.

Oneshooter
Armed and Livin in Texas
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FarCenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
3. Hey Navy -- send it by ship.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
4. Time to requisition another new plane to support the F-35
the endless merry go round that is the defense budget......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hayu_lol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-10 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Back when we had B-36s...the C-124 was built to handle...
the 36 engines, winching them up into the aircraft via the open clam-shell doors. Each engine weighed about 10,000 lbs.

Looks like replacement engines will have to go by 'slow boat' won't it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC