|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-03-10 12:12 PM Original message |
President Obama Tells Governors He Won't Reconsider Yucca Mt. Shutdown |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeybee12 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-03-10 12:17 PM Response to Original message |
1. That's good....knr |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
City Lights (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-03-10 12:22 PM Response to Original message |
2. K&R. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Major Hogwash (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-03-10 12:32 PM Response to Original message |
3. Where are we supposed to put the waste? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
closeupready (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-03-10 12:37 PM Response to Reply #3 |
7. Ship it to one of our colonies, maybe? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluestateguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-03-10 12:53 PM Response to Reply #3 |
10. I dunno. Find some red state and dump it there |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Major Hogwash (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-03-10 12:57 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. That's too far. Trains that carry nuclear waste are targets of opportunity for terrorists. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MineralMan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-03-10 01:25 PM Response to Reply #3 |
17. I don't know....Idaho, maybe? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Angry Dragon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-03-10 12:34 PM Response to Original message |
4. I wonder where they plan to store the nuclear waste?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
closeupready (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-03-10 12:35 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-03-10 12:36 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. still on-site |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MineralMan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-03-10 01:27 PM Response to Reply #4 |
19. The Boundary Waters Canoe Area? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Little Star (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-03-10 01:28 PM Response to Reply #4 |
20. Best suggestion ever! lol |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MilesColtrane (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-03-10 12:37 PM Response to Original message |
8. What IS the alternative? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-03-10 12:43 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. It isn't as if states have no say in whether to build and operate plants |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Radical Activist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-03-10 01:00 PM Response to Original message |
12. Awesome. Bad news for the nuke industry. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MineralMan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-03-10 01:30 PM Response to Reply #12 |
23. It's interesting that some of the very people who are objecting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Radical Activist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-03-10 01:45 PM Response to Reply #23 |
24. That makes more sense than |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MineralMan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-03-10 01:47 PM Response to Reply #24 |
25. That's what I'd think, too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Radical Activist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-03-10 01:56 PM Response to Reply #25 |
29. Sometimes NIMBY is good. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MineralMan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-03-10 02:05 PM Response to Reply #29 |
30. True. I was an active protester of the Diablo Canyon plant |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FLPanhandle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-03-10 01:00 PM Response to Original message |
13. "not an option because of safety concerns"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-03-10 01:06 PM Response to Reply #13 |
14. It's far safer than transporting it across the country and storing it at the flawed Yucca site |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FLPanhandle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-03-10 01:10 PM Response to Reply #14 |
15. It's more dangerous leaving it where it is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-03-10 01:21 PM Response to Reply #15 |
16. so you have a difference of opinion. Good for you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FLPanhandle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-03-10 01:52 PM Response to Reply #16 |
26. The debate on which is safer hasn't been lost |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-03-10 01:53 PM Response to Reply #26 |
28. You incorrectly single him out in this debate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MineralMan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-03-10 01:28 PM Response to Reply #13 |
21. I'm thinking it should be stored in Florida somewhere. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FLPanhandle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-03-10 01:53 PM Response to Reply #21 |
27. Yes, it's not going to be politically attractive anywhere |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MineralMan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-03-10 02:07 PM Response to Reply #27 |
31. Nobody's ignoring the problem, you see. It's just been decided |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
asdjrocky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-03-10 01:25 PM Response to Original message |
18. Wow, that's brave. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadHound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-03-10 01:28 PM Response to Original message |
22. Good for him, hopefully this spells the beginning of the end for the nuclear power industry |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon Sep 16th 2024, 01:49 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC