|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Swede
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-10 11:26 AM Original message |
CNN breaking news House Democrats defy Obama. |
Refresh | +81 Recommendations | Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Skink
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-10 11:27 AM Response to Original message |
1. democrats should make this Obamas waterloo. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
TwilightGardener
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-10 11:28 AM Response to Reply #1 |
6. Actually, they all could have just come up with a great tax deal a long time ago. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Sherman A1
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-10 11:40 AM Response to Reply #6 |
27. Agreed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
TwilightGardener
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-10 11:45 AM Response to Reply #27 |
32. Yep--all this wasted time and bad press for Democrats and the Prez...for nothing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Sherman A1
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-10 11:51 AM Response to Reply #32 |
34. Maybe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
FarCenter
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-10 11:54 AM Response to Reply #34 |
36. It's possible, but then the next congress will pass the compromise in January retroactively |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
bvar22
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-10 12:15 PM Response to Reply #36 |
45. Won't the Republicans need 60 votes too? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
FarCenter
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-10 12:38 PM Response to Reply #45 |
51. The compromise was reached with the Senate -- which is why the House Dems are miffed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Bandit
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-10 12:45 PM Response to Reply #45 |
56. Believe me the Republicans will have their sixty votes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
XanaDUer
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-10 12:24 PM Response to Reply #6 |
47. Yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
donheld
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-10 11:58 PM Response to Reply #6 |
65. Wouldn't it have just died in the Senate like everything else? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
ooglymoogly
![]() |
Fri Dec-10-10 11:56 AM Response to Reply #6 |
67. Yeah, with 0 holding the Dem party purse strings on their campaign financing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
JuniperLea
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-10 11:32 AM Response to Reply #1 |
15. Oh yeah... eating our own is so helpful... eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Proud Liberal Dem
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-10 11:58 AM Response to Reply #1 |
39. Sure, why not? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
dionysus
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-10 12:46 PM Response to Reply #1 |
57. when you're gleefully quoting repukes in your obsession to defeat obama, something's just wrong... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
TwilightGardener
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-10 11:27 AM Response to Original message |
2. Meh, they'll work it out. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-10 11:28 AM Response to Original message |
3. Deleted message |
okieinpain
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-10 11:29 AM Response to Reply #3 |
10. hey, this would make a great t-shirt. I said it first. n/t. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Dawgs
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-10 11:28 AM Response to Original message |
4. Woohoo!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Marr
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-10 11:28 AM Response to Original message |
5. Maybe this will convince Obama to reach accross the aisle, and talk to Democrats. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
lame54
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-10 11:29 AM Response to Reply #5 |
8. nice one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
jillan
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-10 11:30 AM Response to Reply #5 |
13. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
elocs
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-10 11:31 AM Response to Reply #5 |
14. If you need to reach across the aisle it indicates you are on the wrong side of the aisle. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Supersedeas
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-10 11:35 AM Response to Reply #5 |
18. James Clyborn seemed genuinely shocked that the Estate Tax bene was crammed into the compromise |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Individualist
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-10 11:36 AM Response to Reply #5 |
21. Hear, hear! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
City Lights
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-10 11:37 AM Response to Reply #5 |
23. ! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
mmonk
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-10 11:40 AM Response to Reply #5 |
28. Yep. Better than closed door deals with Republicans. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
L0oniX
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-10 11:41 AM Response to Reply #5 |
29. K & R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Catherina
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-10 11:57 AM Response to Reply #5 |
38. +1 n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Jester Messiah
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-10 11:59 AM Response to Reply #5 |
40. *chuckle* [nt] |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
myrna minx
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-10 12:05 PM Response to Reply #5 |
44. Uff Da. Too sad that it's true. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Edweird
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-10 12:19 PM Response to Reply #5 |
46. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Jamastiene
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-10 12:29 PM Response to Reply #5 |
49. One can hope. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Liberalynn
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-10 12:32 PM Response to Reply #5 |
50. He's too busy with his new pals too talk to Democrats |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Raksha
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-10 12:43 PM Response to Reply #5 |
54. Good one! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Spike from MN
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-10 12:51 PM Response to Reply #5 |
58. LOL! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Spike from MN
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-10 12:53 PM Response to Reply #5 |
61. LOL! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Smashcut
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-10 04:19 PM Response to Reply #5 |
62. Spot on! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Canuckistanian
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-10 09:55 PM Response to Reply #5 |
64. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Cant trust em
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-10 11:29 AM Response to Original message |
7. Good for them. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Autumn
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-10 11:29 AM Response to Original message |
9. Allright, now this is getting good |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
kentuck
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-10 11:29 AM Response to Original message |
11. No news here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
wtmusic
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-10 11:33 AM Response to Reply #11 |
17. I'd like to think this was engineered to give Obama an exit strategy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Cant trust em
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-10 11:36 AM Response to Reply #17 |
20. I think that more likely we've stumbled into an opportunity. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
wtmusic
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-10 11:43 AM Response to Reply #20 |
30. Let's hope Obama is bold enough to seize it. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Cant trust em
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-10 11:54 AM Response to Reply #30 |
35. I'm not sure how he can seize it without having it seem like he was in on it from the beginning. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Dawgs
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-10 11:36 AM Response to Reply #11 |
22. It's no news that Obama tax cuts for the rich will only get support from Republicans and Blue Dogs? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
quinnox
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-10 11:29 AM Response to Original message |
12. Wow, surprise to me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
arcane1
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-10 11:33 AM Response to Original message |
16. Good, it's about time! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
rucky
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-10 11:35 AM Response to Original message |
19. Props to Pelosi for this one! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
jtown1123
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-10 11:37 AM Response to Original message |
24. We need to Pressure the Senate NOW |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
somone
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-10 11:37 AM Response to Original message |
25. Go, Nancy! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
bigtree
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-10 11:39 AM Response to Original message |
26. his proposal is called a 'framework' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
frazzled
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-10 11:44 AM Response to Original message |
31. They wouldn't take it up in the fall, before elections, either |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
JoePhilly
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-10 12:40 PM Response to Reply #31 |
52. +1000 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Fruittree
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-10 12:44 PM Response to Reply #31 |
55. Exactly - why everyone but Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
FarCenter
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-10 11:48 AM Response to Original message |
33. Non-binding voice vote with not all of the caucus present won't mean a thing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
onenote
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-10 12:52 PM Response to Reply #33 |
59. Delete wrong place. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Tatiana
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-10 11:56 AM Response to Original message |
37. Barney Frank thought it was coming to the floor, but I guess Pelosi and Hoyer ixnayed it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
FarCenter
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-10 12:05 PM Response to Reply #37 |
43. NBC's Chuck Todd reports that House leaders still intend to bring the tax bill up for a vote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Robyn66
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-10 12:00 PM Response to Original message |
41. Where were the democrats |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
young but wise
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-10 12:04 PM Response to Reply #41 |
42. Bam. Agreed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
goforit
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-10 12:28 PM Response to Original message |
48. So long Obama!! Ya not going to be re-elected. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
shireen
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-10 12:41 PM Response to Original message |
53. THANK YOU, DEMS!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
onenote
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-10 12:53 PM Response to Original message |
60. Profiles in Courage. Not. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Swamp Rat
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-10 04:19 PM Response to Original message |
63. GOOD!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Lorien
![]() |
Fri Dec-10-10 04:56 AM Response to Original message |
66. Bravo!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Mon Apr 21st 2025, 05:58 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC