|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
madinmaryland
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-10 10:29 PM Original message |
Fucking great. Nader is just suggesting that there will be a primary challenger to Obama AND.. |
Refresh | 0 Recommendations | Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
provis99
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-10 10:31 PM Response to Original message |
1. Nader isn't a Democrat, so how could he primary challenge him? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-10 11:04 PM Response to Reply #1 |
24. Deleted message |
hfojvt
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-10 11:22 PM Response to Reply #1 |
32. people can change their party registration |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
JTFrog
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-10 11:57 PM Response to Reply #32 |
36. The asshole doesn't stand a chance in hell of getting any support from the Democratic party. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
WinkyDink
![]() |
Fri Dec-10-10 09:45 AM Response to Reply #32 |
60. Nader will NEVER register either D or R. That is one principle he will not break. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
readmoreoften
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-10 11:58 PM Response to Reply #1 |
37. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
notadmblnd
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-10 10:31 PM Response to Original message |
2. Sounds like it will be Grayson. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
tblue37
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-10 10:49 PM Response to Reply #2 |
20. I'd vote for Grayson! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Liberalynn
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-10 11:23 PM Response to Reply #20 |
33. I'd vote for Grayson |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
struggle4progress
![]() |
Fri Dec-10-10 12:24 AM Response to Reply #2 |
49. Grayson just lost his seat. Why should we expect him to win a national election? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
notadmblnd
![]() |
Fri Dec-10-10 07:55 AM Response to Reply #49 |
52. Because he'll have more than just his state supporting him? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Ikonoklast
![]() |
Fri Dec-10-10 09:47 AM Response to Reply #52 |
61. Like Dennis Kucinich!!! LESS THAN 2%!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
tblue37
![]() |
Fri Dec-10-10 01:00 PM Response to Reply #61 |
64. No, Kucinich, though I like him and deplore the way he is mocked in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
notadmblnd
![]() |
Fri Dec-10-10 04:43 PM Response to Reply #61 |
67. I like Dennis. Unfortunately, the right has portrayed him a borderline luny |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
tblue37
![]() |
Fri Dec-10-10 12:59 PM Response to Reply #49 |
63. For the same reason why although Palin does well among her base, she |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
ThePhilosopher04
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-10 10:31 PM Response to Original message |
3. I say good!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
dennis4868
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-10 10:40 PM Response to Reply #3 |
16. Someone with backbone.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
ThePhilosopher04
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-10 11:45 PM Response to Reply #16 |
35. Has everything to do with backbone... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
dennis4868
![]() |
Fri Dec-10-10 12:21 AM Response to Reply #35 |
47. the fillubuster is not a threat by the repubs.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Recursion
![]() |
Fri Dec-10-10 09:50 AM Response to Reply #35 |
62. The Republicans have been filibustering |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
myrna minx
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-10 10:31 PM Response to Original message |
4. Nader isn't a Democrat so how can he primary Obama? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
NoPasaran
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-10 10:31 PM Response to Original message |
5. I would welcome the spectacle of Nader being crushed like a bug in a primary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-10 10:32 PM Response to Original message |
6. Deleted message |
JBoy
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-10 10:32 PM Response to Original message |
7. I didn't hear him say it would or should be him. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
LonePirate
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-10 10:33 PM Response to Original message |
8. I will vote for Nader or Grayson if they run in a Democratic primary against the current capitulator |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
TwilightGardener
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-10 10:33 PM Response to Original message |
9. Isn't he..what, 87? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
tekisui
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-10 10:33 PM Response to Original message |
10. Nader is too old and not a Dem. But, it would be fucking great to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
EmeraldCityGrl
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-10 11:08 PM Response to Reply #10 |
27. This was Nadar's rationale. Force Obama to be what we |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
tekisui
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-10 11:16 PM Response to Reply #27 |
30. Unless there is a real tipping piont, I don't see a primary challenge |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Liberalynn
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-10 11:29 PM Response to Reply #30 |
34. I am hoping that something leaks from Wiki |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
BrendaBrick
![]() |
Fri Dec-10-10 04:49 PM Response to Reply #27 |
68. Here Here! K&R n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
pacalo
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-10 10:33 PM Response to Original message |
11. Was that in response to the DLC's "they've got nowhere to go" slap-in-the-face meme? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Individualist
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-10 10:35 PM Response to Original message |
12. rofl |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
superduperfarleft
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-10 10:36 PM Response to Reply #12 |
13. Seriously, it would be nice if OP would provide a link or something. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
madinmaryland
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-10 10:44 PM Response to Reply #13 |
17. From Lawrence O'Donnell program at 10pm est. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Catherina
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-10 10:37 PM Response to Original message |
14. What Nader said is " I'm telling people they need to find somebody." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
rucky
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-10 10:38 PM Response to Original message |
15. Nader was too old 10 years ago. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Monique1
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-10 10:45 PM Response to Reply #15 |
18. Thank goodness |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-10 10:47 PM Response to Original message |
19. Hate to point this out but it will NOT be Nader |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Stinky The Clown
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-10 10:54 PM Response to Original message |
21. I would not oppose a primary, but I can't imagine many Democrats embracing St. Ralphie |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
madinmaryland
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-10 11:00 PM Response to Reply #21 |
23. What I can't believe is that there are so many |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Erose999
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-10 11:08 PM Response to Reply #23 |
26. Rather be stabbed in the chest than in the back. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
JTFrog
![]() |
Fri Dec-10-10 12:03 AM Response to Reply #26 |
41. Oh the drama.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
readmoreoften
![]() |
Fri Dec-10-10 12:00 AM Response to Reply #23 |
39. Well the whole passing OSHA and the Mine Safety Act was pretty cool. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
madinmaryland
![]() |
Fri Dec-10-10 12:46 AM Original message |
I would have voted for Nader 40-45 years ago. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Puregonzo1188
![]() |
Fri Dec-10-10 12:46 AM Response to Reply #39 |
50. Or the other over 100 pieces of legislation he was involved in between the what was it 1967-1976? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
readmoreoften
![]() |
Fri Dec-10-10 12:00 AM Response to Reply #23 |
40. Well the whole passing OSHA and the Mine Safety Act was pretty cool. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Fearless
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-10 10:59 PM Response to Original message |
22. Yes. Get back in line you treasonous Democrat. Fear fear fear... Don't rock the boat. Etc... n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Lyric
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-10 11:07 PM Response to Original message |
25. If someone competent and sane challenges Obama from the left |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
ibegurpard
![]() |
Fri Dec-10-10 12:08 AM Response to Reply #25 |
43. mine as well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
inna
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-10 11:09 PM Response to Original message |
28. glad this crap was unrec'd already. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Liberalynn
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-10 11:11 PM Response to Original message |
29. While I Don't Want Nader |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
JTFrog
![]() |
Fri Dec-10-10 12:08 AM Response to Reply #29 |
44. Yeah, the bullshit line that Obama can't win was tried and failed already in 2008. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Liberalynn
![]() |
Fri Dec-10-10 07:27 AM Response to Reply #44 |
51. I was never one who said Obama couldn't win back then. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
JTFrog
![]() |
Fri Dec-10-10 09:21 AM Response to Reply #51 |
57. You know what they say about opinions. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Liberalynn
![]() |
Fri Dec-10-10 05:45 PM Response to Reply #57 |
69. And that's your opinion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Better Believe It
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-10 11:20 PM Response to Original message |
31. Why didn't you post an actual Nader quote and link to that quote? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
readmoreoften
![]() |
Thu Dec-09-10 11:59 PM Response to Original message |
38. And this information comes from...? Or just random Nader bashing? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
apocalypsehow
![]() |
Fri Dec-10-10 12:07 AM Response to Original message |
42. I don't take a man who basically gave us eight years of George W. Bush to salve his ego seriously, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
snooper2
![]() |
Fri Dec-10-10 12:12 AM Response to Original message |
45. Sweet...What do you think those 12,607 people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad
![]() |
Fri Dec-10-10 12:12 AM Response to Original message |
46. Good. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Puregonzo1188
![]() |
Fri Dec-10-10 12:23 AM Response to Original message |
48. That's not quite how I read his comments. I took it as him saying that because |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
LWolf
![]() |
Fri Dec-10-10 07:59 AM Response to Original message |
53. I hope there will be a primary challenger. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Unknown Liberal
![]() |
Fri Dec-10-10 08:46 AM Response to Original message |
54. Kucinich |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Le Taz Hot
![]() |
Fri Dec-10-10 08:56 AM Response to Original message |
55. So? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
NNN0LHI
![]() |
Fri Dec-10-10 09:11 AM Response to Original message |
56. Hey Ralph. Take this from a true liberal. Blow me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
SidDithers
![]() |
Fri Dec-10-10 09:31 AM Response to Original message |
58. Fuck Ralph Nader...nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Erose999
![]() |
Fri Dec-10-10 09:42 AM Response to Original message |
59. Obama is pretty much unsafe at any speed. Nader or whoever else has my vote. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
ellie
![]() |
Fri Dec-10-10 01:02 PM Response to Original message |
65. Fuck Ralph Nader |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
democracy1st
![]() |
Fri Dec-10-10 01:08 PM Response to Reply #65 |
66. you would ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Liberalynn
![]() |
Fri Dec-10-10 05:48 PM Response to Reply #66 |
70. that was funny |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thu May 01st 2025, 05:39 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC