Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fucking great. Nader is just suggesting that there will be a primary challenger to Obama AND..

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 10:29 PM
Original message
Fucking great. Nader is just suggesting that there will be a primary challenger to Obama AND..
it sounds like it will be NADER.

Here we go again.

Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
provis99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. Nader isn't a Democrat, so how could he primary challenge him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
24. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 11:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
32. people can change their party registration
although I understand that the party can official reject a candidate even if that candidate files, at least at the state level.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
JTFrog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 11:57 PM
Response to Reply #32
36. The asshole doesn't stand a chance in hell of getting any support from the Democratic party.
Nor should he.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #32
60. Nader will NEVER register either D or R. That is one principle he will not break.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 11:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
37. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
notadmblnd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. Sounds like it will be Grayson.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
tblue37 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
20. I'd vote for Grayson! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Liberalynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #20
33. I'd vote for Grayson
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 12:24 AM
Response to Reply #2
49. Grayson just lost his seat. Why should we expect him to win a national election?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
notadmblnd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 07:55 AM
Response to Reply #49
52. Because he'll have more than just his state supporting him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Ikonoklast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #52
61. Like Dennis Kucinich!!! LESS THAN 2%!!!!!
You people are consistent in one thing.


Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
tblue37 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #61
64. No, Kucinich, though I like him and deplore the way he is mocked in
the national media, is the sort of person who got beat up by bullies on the playground. Grayson, on the other hand, does nto come across as a person who is easy totrivialize and mock.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
notadmblnd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #61
67. I like Dennis. Unfortunately, the right has portrayed him a borderline luny
Edited on Fri Dec-10-10 05:29 PM by notadmblnd
And he doesn't get enough facetime in the media. Also too,(my little palin immitation) he's short, has big ears and reminds people of an elf. I find it endearing, but I think some people think things like fairies and elves are a little scary. I figure it's just them watching too many "Leprechaun" movies.

Grayson, is much better looking (and people do vote based on attractiveness- I think it's subconscious), but they do.:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
tblue37 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #49
63. For the same reason why although Palin does well among her base, she
Edited on Fri Dec-10-10 01:18 PM by tblue37
would do badly in the national election. He was in a conservative state, and he was targeted by the RNC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ThePhilosopher04 Donating Member (435 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
3. I say good!!
The more the merrier...maybe somebody with some backbone will rise to the challenge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
dennis4868 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
16. Someone with backbone....
Still cannot defeat a republican fillubuster to allow tax increases on the wealthy....has nothing to do with backbone!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ThePhilosopher04 Donating Member (435 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 11:45 PM
Response to Reply #16
35. Has everything to do with backbone...
the problem with liberals is we cave every time we get threatened...if Pubes wanna filibuster, make them filibuster the old fashioned way...if they continue to dig in, let all the tax cuts expire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
dennis4868 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 12:21 AM
Response to Reply #35
47. the fillubuster is not a threat by the repubs....
it's REALITY! Obama is a realist and cut a deal that will at least create some jobs, keep middle class people from going into poverty and not giving the lowest tax bracket a 50% increase in their taxes....NO MATTER WHAT OBAMA OR ANY DEM PRESIDENT WOULD DO THEY WOULD BE FACING A FILLUBUSTER and that's why there was no fight to be had....you can only fight when there is something to fight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #35
62. The Republicans have been filibustering
Go to LOC or senate.gov assuming Operation Payback hasn't taken them down, and look for every "Motion to Proceed" or "Cloture Motion" that failed. That was a filibuster. There's nothing "fake" about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
4. Nader isn't a Democrat so how can he primary Obama?
:shrug: I can see him running against him in 2012, but not in the primary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
NoPasaran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
5. I would welcome the spectacle of Nader being crushed like a bug in a primary
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 10:32 PM
Response to Original message
6. Deleted message
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
JBoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 10:32 PM
Response to Original message
7. I didn't hear him say it would or should be him.
He did say that that there needed to be a primary challenge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
LonePirate Donating Member (898 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
8. I will vote for Nader or Grayson if they run in a Democratic primary against the current capitulator
Edited on Thu Dec-09-10 10:33 PM by LonePirate
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
9. Isn't he..what, 87?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
10. Nader is too old and not a Dem. But, it would be fucking great to
have a primary challenger from the left. If for no other reason to expose how far from the left Obama actually is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
EmeraldCityGrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #10
27. This was Nadar's rationale. Force Obama to be what we
voted for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 11:16 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. Unless there is a real tipping piont, I don't see a primary challenge
beating Obama. But, it can push him , and the Democratic Party to the left, where it should be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Liberalynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #30
34. I am hoping that something leaks from Wiki
Edited on Thu Dec-09-10 11:30 PM by Liberalynn
that would be the tipping point . That could just be my current anger talking but I can't see Obama ever coming back and leading this party back to its FDR roots. He has more or less admitted he doesn't share our values and isn't willing to fight for principles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
BrendaBrick Donating Member (859 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #27
68. Here Here! K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
pacalo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
11. Was that in response to the DLC's "they've got nowhere to go" slap-in-the-face meme?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Individualist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 10:35 PM
Response to Original message
12. rofl
Start a Nader bashing thread in an attempt to distract people from Obama's anti-progressive actions. That'll work. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
superduperfarleft Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Seriously, it would be nice if OP would provide a link or something.
I'm amazed at the people who think DU is their own private twitter account.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. From Lawrence O'Donnell program at 10pm est.
Sorry I left out the reference to what I was talking about.

Now I will twitter over to the twitter account that I do not have!

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Catherina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
14. What Nader said is " I'm telling people they need to find somebody."
...

He said Obama's decision to allow tax-cut extensions for the wealthy in the lame-duck deal betrays the progressives who supported his campaign in 2008 and called the president a "con man."

"There will be a primary," Nader said. "Just a question of how prominent a person . This deal is the last straw."

"Obama's position has been that the liberal, progressive wing has nowhere to go, therefore they can't turn their back on the administration. But a challenge will hold his feet to the fire and signal that we do have somewhere to go."

The tax deal, a blow to progressives, has prompted media speculation about such a challenge, although no names have been aired. Outgoing Sen. Russ Feingold (D-Wis.), one of the chamber's most reliably liberal voices, has said he's not interested.

"He keeps one step away from the liberal progressive grasp," Nader said, describing the mood among on the left. "He's always just one step ahead from them grabbing his neck."

Nader had harsh words for the president's approach to politics: "He has no fixed principles. He's opportunistic - he goes for expedience, like Clinton. Some call him temperamentally conflict-averse. If you want to be harsher, you say he has no prlnciples and he's opportunistic."

"He's a con man. I have no use for him," Nader said.

...

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/132835--nader-i-am-looking-for-someone-to-challenge-obama-in-2012
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
15. Nader was too old 10 years ago. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Monique1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. Thank goodness
no need to spend money that I don't actually can't afford and no need to vote anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
19. Hate to point this out but it will NOT be Nader
But this talk started in all seriousness four days ago... and not from Nader
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 10:54 PM
Response to Original message
21. I would not oppose a primary, but I can't imagine many Democrats embracing St. Ralphie
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. What I can't believe is that there are so many
DU'ers that are willing to support Mr. Nader.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Erose999 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. Rather be stabbed in the chest than in the back. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
JTFrog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 12:03 AM
Response to Reply #26
41. Oh the drama....
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 12:00 AM
Response to Reply #23
39. Well the whole passing OSHA and the Mine Safety Act was pretty cool.
A hell of a lot more than Obama ever did. Good things, I mean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 12:46 AM
Original message
I would have voted for Nader 40-45 years ago. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Puregonzo1188 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 12:46 AM
Response to Reply #39
50. Or the other over 100 pieces of legislation he was involved in between the what was it 1967-1976?
Including the Freedom of Information Act. The list is pretty astonishing. He was a very effective consumer advocate. I read a biography of him once, I was shocked by his early career. You would never know anything about it from the mainstream media. I think Chris Hedges wrote a piece on how the New York Times basically set out to make him ineffective in the late 70s and essentially did so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 12:00 AM
Response to Reply #23
40. Well the whole passing OSHA and the Mine Safety Act was pretty cool.
A hell of a lot more than Obama ever did. Good things, I mean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Fearless Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 10:59 PM
Response to Original message
22. Yes. Get back in line you treasonous Democrat. Fear fear fear... Don't rock the boat. Etc... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Lyric Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
25. If someone competent and sane challenges Obama from the left
...they'll certainly have my primary vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ibegurpard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 12:08 AM
Response to Reply #25
43. mine as well
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
inna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
28. glad this crap was unrec'd already.
Edited on Thu Dec-09-10 11:10 PM by inna
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Liberalynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 11:11 PM
Response to Original message
29. While I Don't Want Nader
Edited on Thu Dec-09-10 11:12 PM by Liberalynn
I do want a primary challenger. What I would like more is for Obama to withdraw his name from consideration as a nominee just like LBJ did.

Obama has no respect for a good portion of his party, he admits it. So why should he remain our representative? He burned too many bridges with this "STUNT" imho. He can run as the Republican nominee.

I know the convential wisdom is we can't win with a primary challenger, but IMHO we won't win with Obama anyway. Again JMHO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
JTFrog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 12:08 AM
Response to Reply #29
44. Yeah, the bullshit line that Obama can't win was tried and failed already in 2008.
But I guess we'll get to watch folks try to push it again next election. The result, however, will be the same.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Liberalynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 07:27 AM
Response to Reply #44
51. I was never one who said Obama couldn't win back then.
Edited on Fri Dec-10-10 07:52 AM by Liberalynn
I believed he could win and that he could change things. I did not vote for him in the primaries true, but once he was the nominee I got on board, donated, and cheered for him as hard as anyone else. I was proud of him and proud he was our nominee. I cried tears of relief that he was in charge and planning on ending 8 insufferable years of Bush policies. I hung my flag out on the porch and sang Happy Days Are Here Again and America the Beautiful the day after the election.

Now that he IMHO is the one who has changed to fit Washington instead of changing Washingtion as he promised, however, and sided more with the Repulicans than he has with Democrats, I don't think it will be so easy for him. He has a record to run on now and that record IMHO will be the difference this time. Its what I am basing my opinion on but it's just my opinion. I am not asking you or anyone else to agree.

If as you believe he can win no matter what then he and those who still support him have nothing to fear from a primary challenger either then right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
JTFrog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #51
57. You know what they say about opinions.
It doesn't matter whether you said he couldn't win back then or not. It was pushed here on a daily basis then and it's being tried again now. It's was laughable and transparent then and it's laughable now.

Your if then logic won't work on me. There is no fear here. Only disappointment in the fact that people would rather see the party go down in flames to spite their face.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Liberalynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #57
69. And that's your opinion
Edited on Fri Dec-10-10 05:47 PM by Liberalynn
Have a great day :) :hug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 11:20 PM
Response to Original message
31. Why didn't you post an actual Nader quote and link to that quote?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 11:59 PM
Response to Original message
38. And this information comes from...? Or just random Nader bashing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
apocalypsehow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 12:07 AM
Response to Original message
42. I don't take a man who basically gave us eight years of George W. Bush to salve his ego seriously,
period.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
snooper2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 12:12 AM
Response to Original message
45. Sweet...What do you think those 12,607 people
have to look forward to every four years :rofl:


I met Nader by the way in Crawford TX at an anti-war rally...What a fucking tool FYI
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 12:12 AM
Response to Original message
46. Good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Puregonzo1188 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 12:23 AM
Response to Original message
48. That's not quite how I read his comments. I took it as him saying that because
of the tax cuts deal Obama was now guaranteed a primary challenger. He doesn't seem to implying it would be him, particularly since he said "Just a question of how prominent a person . This deal is the last straw."

http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2010/12/09-6
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 07:59 AM
Response to Original message
53. I hope there will be a primary challenger.
:thumbsup: :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Unknown Liberal Donating Member (15 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
54. Kucinich
He's a Dem through and through, he speaks for the 98%ers, whether they realize it or not.

All I see thrown against him are baseless canards about his height, that he says he saw what he called a UFO, or that he's anti-abortion and gay rights when he is not.

Having a tall, good looking President sure hasn't turned out to be the answer for people so far.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Le Taz Hot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
55. So?
This Nader obsession is bizarre. If you don't like him, don't vote for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
56. Hey Ralph. Take this from a true liberal. Blow me
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
SidDithers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
58. Fuck Ralph Nader...nt
Sid
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Erose999 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
59. Obama is pretty much unsafe at any speed. Nader or whoever else has my vote.


Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ellie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
65. Fuck Ralph Nader
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
democracy1st Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #65
66. you would ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Liberalynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #66
70. that was funny
thanks for lightening the mood. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 01st 2025, 05:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC