Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Legalizing Internet poker gets push from Harry Reid in lame-duck session

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 08:48 AM
Original message
Legalizing Internet poker gets push from Harry Reid in lame-duck session
way to go harry.....



As it scrambles to consider landmark legislation on taxes, immigration and gays in the military, the lame-duck Congress is suddenly engaged in a debate it didn't anticipate: whether to legalize online poker.

Senate Majority Leader Harry M. Reid (D-Nev.) is pushing a bill that would give official government approval to Texas hold-'em, five-card stud and other Internet poker games, which currently exist in a legal twilight zone dominated by companies operating from the Isle of Man and other exotic foreign locales.

The idea is to lure some of that multibillion-dollar business into the United States - and give the federal government up to $3 billion in annual revenues in the process.

The measure would be a boon for Las Vegas-based casinos, which supported Reid in his hard-fought reelection campaign and are eager to enter the lucrative world of online gaming. Many states and localities, including the District, have started thinking about legalizing Internet gaming on their own, giving federal lawmakers even more incentive to act.

"Under the status quo, Internet poker is played by millions of Americans every day in an essentially unregulated environment," Reid said in a statement this week. "The legislation I am working on would get our collective heads out of the sand and create a strict regulatory environment to protect U.S. consumers, prevent underage gambling and respect the decisions of states that don't allow gambling."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/12/10/AR2010121005756_pf.html
Refresh | +1 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
1. It should be legal. And, I guess, reulated by the feds. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
2. Can't get DADT done. But he can do this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
cowcommander Donating Member (679 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
3. It was illegal to begin with?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 01st 2025, 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC