|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
saracat
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 01:34 PM Original message |
Just a simple request. Elizabeth Edwards requested that attacks on John be ceased |
Refresh | +72 Recommendations | Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
ZombieHorde
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 01:36 PM Response to Original message |
1. What made her so great? I don't know much about her. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
WilliamPitt
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 01:40 PM Response to Reply #1 |
5. Your loss. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
ZombieHorde
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 03:27 PM Response to Reply #5 |
33. I don't think her Wikipedia page is capturing the quality/aspect |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
tavalon
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 08:11 AM Response to Reply #33 |
89. She was a DUer back in the days when that automatically conferred honor |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
ZombieHorde
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 01:49 PM Response to Reply #89 |
94. I see. She was helpful to the community here. This makes perfect sense. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
tavalon
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 08:58 PM Response to Reply #94 |
95. We've lost many a really good DUer here and they are always accorded |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
mentalsolstice
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 11:51 PM Response to Reply #5 |
101. And so she was a DUer? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
pamela
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 01:55 PM Response to Reply #1 |
15. She was... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 03:04 PM Response to Reply #1 |
21. Deleted message |
ZombieHorde
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 03:11 PM Response to Reply #21 |
23. Asking for information is insensitive? Interesting. Your anger is your punishment. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
WinkyDink
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 08:21 PM Response to Reply #23 |
62. "What made her so great?" carries a negative, challenging tone, FYI. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
ZombieHorde
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 09:06 PM Response to Reply #62 |
67. I specifically stated I was not challenging people's admiration. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
MrMickeysMom
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 09:19 PM Response to Reply #67 |
70. Well. for one thing.... she would not be the kind of person... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
WinkyDink
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 09:32 PM Response to Reply #67 |
97. There is a difference in tone between "What made her so great?" and "What made her great?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Riley133
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 04:57 PM Response to Reply #1 |
52. Were you around in 2004? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
ZombieHorde
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 06:56 PM Response to Reply #52 |
56. No, I started lurking around 2006 or so. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
tavalon
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 08:13 AM Response to Reply #56 |
90. That would explain it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
BlueIris
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 10:39 PM Response to Reply #1 |
74. "I am not trying to insult someone who had recently passed away." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
ZombieHorde
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 10:50 PM Response to Reply #74 |
77. I am starting to suspect people are just fucking with me. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
DainBramaged
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 09:25 PM Response to Reply #1 |
96. You've been here a while and know not of Elizabeth Edwards? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
ZombieHorde
![]() |
Mon Dec-13-10 12:14 AM Response to Reply #96 |
102. I think that is the second most hated reply I have made on DU. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
nashville_brook
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 01:37 PM Response to Original message |
2. i'm with you. k and r. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Dinger
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 01:39 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. Yes, Same Here (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
John Q. Citizen
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 01:38 PM Response to Original message |
3. it's the fool who plays it cool by making the world a little colder |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Whoa_Nelly
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 01:42 PM Response to Reply #3 |
6. +1 n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
dkf
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 01:42 PM Response to Original message |
7. Yes I will. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
pinto
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 01:43 PM Response to Original message |
8. Kick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Brickbat
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 01:44 PM Response to Original message |
9. Gracious to the very end. We can all learn from her. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
The Backlash Cometh
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 01:46 PM Response to Original message |
10. No problem. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
cali
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 01:47 PM Response to Original message |
11. I don't think there have been any attacks on him here today. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
MonteLukast
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 01:48 PM Response to Original message |
12. Kicked. Definitely. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Ninga
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 01:51 PM Response to Original message |
13. Elizabeth, among all of her many achievements and qualities, is a shinning example of how |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Darth_Kitten
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 01:52 PM Response to Original message |
14. K & R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
OHdem10
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 01:57 PM Response to Original message |
16. Attacking John only hurts the children. Furthermore, I never |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
karynnj
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 03:17 PM Response to Reply #16 |
27. There was plenty of disgust when Gingrich's actions were reported |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
bushisanidiot
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 03:28 PM Response to Reply #27 |
34. Sorry, but Newt's actions were far worse. He went to the friggin' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
smokey nj
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 03:33 PM Response to Reply #34 |
35. And, contrary to what was written in the post to which you are responding, Newt's infidelity DID NOT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
karynnj
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 03:42 PM Response to Reply #35 |
40. There were many things that ended his Congressional career |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
karynnj
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 03:39 PM Response to Reply #34 |
38. Of course he is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
pacalo
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 07:38 PM Response to Reply #38 |
58. C'mon, guys -- let it go. Stay with the spirit of the OP. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Kalyke
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 10:48 PM Response to Reply #34 |
76. How so? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
tavalon
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 08:16 AM Response to Reply #34 |
92. You don't quite have your information correct, however, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
1badjedi
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 01:59 PM Response to Original message |
17. People will say what they will |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Demoiselle
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 02:03 PM Response to Original message |
18. I'm happy to honor her request. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
hlthe2b
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 02:44 PM Response to Original message |
19. I didn't realize they had traveled together to Japan... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
bobbolink
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 02:58 PM Response to Original message |
20. I can tell that Elizabeth is a model for you, saracat. You show the same grace and peace. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 03:06 PM Response to Original message |
22. Deleted message |
sabrina 1
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 03:14 PM Response to Reply #22 |
26. Edwards is no longer a Dem Politician, he is a private citizen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
karynnj
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 03:18 PM Response to Reply #22 |
28. Nice catch |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
apocalypsehow
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 04:59 PM Response to Reply #22 |
53. What?!? And practice what we preach?!?!? Where's the fun in that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
pacalo
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 07:53 PM Response to Reply #53 |
61. Subverting the topic at hand to satisfy petty grievances is tacky & rude. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Number23
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 07:12 PM Response to Reply #22 |
57. You win the thread, Scurry. Too bad it's not one worth winning! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Scurrilous
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 09:30 PM Response to Reply #57 |
72. ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
pacalo
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 07:42 PM Response to Reply #22 |
59. Oh my. Couldn't you have let that go, considering the topic? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
asdjrocky
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 08:33 PM Response to Reply #22 |
65. That's not what she asked for. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
karynnj
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 03:12 PM Response to Original message |
24. self deleted because I did not completely read the OP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
cali
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 03:14 PM Response to Reply #24 |
25. I think she's just asking that people refrain from it today. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
karynnj
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 03:21 PM Response to Reply #25 |
30. I don't get that from the OP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
cali
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 03:26 PM Response to Reply #30 |
32. "Can we just for today , in tribute to a very great lady, pay tribute by honoring those wishes?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
karynnj
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 03:33 PM Response to Reply #32 |
36. You're correct - I had missed that very obvious statement |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Bluerthanblue
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 03:20 PM Response to Original message |
29. Indeed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
uppityperson
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 03:24 PM Response to Original message |
31. k&r |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
bomberman
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 03:37 PM Response to Original message |
37. What, exactly, did John do to deserve everybody's scorn? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
cali
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 03:40 PM Response to Reply #37 |
39. let's not do this here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
WinkyDink
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 08:23 PM Response to Reply #37 |
63. AREYOU JOKING? A child with a mistress, both of whom he DENIED, is "big whoop" to you? It should be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Kalyke
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 10:51 PM Response to Reply #37 |
78. Big whoop? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
tavalon
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 08:20 AM Response to Reply #37 |
93. That wasn't why so many here were furious |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
GentryDixon
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 03:44 PM Response to Original message |
41. I agree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
JanMichael
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 04:08 PM Response to Original message |
42. You are just inviting more biting comments about the man with this post. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Bluebear
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 04:17 PM Response to Reply #42 |
44. Funny thing, yours is one of the few biting comments that seemed to be "invited". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
JanMichael
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 04:19 PM Response to Reply #44 |
45. ummm I didn't mention him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Bluebear
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 04:20 PM Response to Reply #45 |
47. You didnt mention who? Who is "the man", David Hasselhoff? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 04:53 PM Response to Reply #47 |
51. Deleted message |
bobbolink
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 04:19 PM Response to Reply #44 |
46. !!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
SammyWinstonJack
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 04:10 PM Response to Original message |
43. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Still a Democrat
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 04:26 PM Response to Original message |
48. The decent thing is not to attack now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
SmileyRose
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 04:44 PM Response to Original message |
49. kick and recommended |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
RB TexLa
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 04:51 PM Response to Original message |
50. Are you kidding? A Democrat DUers can look down their nose at and claim morality? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
tomg
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 05:05 PM Response to Original message |
54. A good request from |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
felix_numinous
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 05:11 PM Response to Original message |
55. I have a high respect |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
JVS
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 07:45 PM Response to Original message |
60. I've spoken both positively and negatively of the man. Today I offer only my condolences. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 08:24 PM Response to Original message |
64. I am sure some will never do that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Kalyke
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 10:54 PM Response to Reply #64 |
79. I, uh... don't think that was HER decision at all. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 12:52 AM Response to Reply #79 |
82. Yes and still no place for you or I to get our noses into |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
asdjrocky
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 08:38 PM Response to Original message |
66. It was always about the ideas and the words for me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
EmeraldCityGrl
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 09:16 PM Response to Original message |
68. With all due respect to Elizabeth, no one ever talks about |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Time for change
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 09:16 PM Response to Original message |
69. Amen to that, and good for her! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Haole Girl
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 09:21 PM Response to Original message |
71. I have no problem with that. However...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Duppers
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 10:19 PM Response to Original message |
73. Thank you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Kalyke
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 10:45 PM Response to Original message |
75. While I could only hope to respect her wishes (are they hers? There is no link.), |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
spooky3
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 11:07 PM Response to Original message |
80. k&r; thank you, saracat. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
JanMichael
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 11:19 PM Response to Original message |
81. Deleted message |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Bluebear
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 01:13 AM Response to Reply #81 |
84. Poor you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Liberty Belle
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 01:10 AM Response to Original message |
83. John did many good things, before he screwed up. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
andym
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 02:17 AM Response to Original message |
85. The best way to ensure no attacks, is for all to agree not to ever mention John Edwards again on DU |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Major Hogwash
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 02:24 AM Response to Original message |
86. Time's up. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
laughingliberal
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 02:43 AM Response to Original message |
87. K & R Very sad for the whole family and for us. She will be missed. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Maru Kitteh
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 04:23 AM Response to Original message |
88. I think he fooled her unto the end, only for his own purposes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
mwb970
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 08:13 AM Response to Original message |
91. I had completely forgotten about John. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
mentalsolstice
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 11:23 PM Response to Original message |
98. Oh puhleeze! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
DeadEyeDyck
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 11:24 PM Response to Original message |
99. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
tuckessee
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 11:36 PM Response to Original message |
100. People who want privacy should not choose to live very public lives. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Tue Apr 22nd 2025, 05:03 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC