Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

MUST READ: 'Ike’s Speech' - TheNewYorker

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 02:20 PM
Original message
MUST READ: 'Ike’s Speech' - TheNewYorker
Ike’s Speech
by Jim Newton - TheNewYorker
DECEMBER 20, 2010

<snip>

A few months ago, Grant Moos was closing his boathouse, near Hackensack, Minnesota, as he does every summer, tying up loose ends, sweeping up debris. This year, though, his sister Kathy insisted that it was finally time to do something about six cardboard boxes that for decades had been stacked in a corner next to a 7.5-horsepower Evinrude engine.

The boxes belonged to their father, Malcolm Moos, a journalist and academic who was a speechwriter for President Dwight Eisenhower. When Moos left the White House, in 1961, he donated some of his papers to the Eisenhower Presidential Library, in Abilene, Kansas, but he kept some, too.

The boxes were full of pine needles, acorns, and mouse droppings, and smelled of campfires. As Moos looked through the contents, he came across a batch of folders marked “Farewell Address.” He looked up the Eisenhower Library, and sent the boxes off to Abilene.

At first, the library did not know what it had. As archivists began to go through the papers, however, they discovered a trove of drafts, memos, and research materials that had long been missing from the record of one of the twentieth century’s most important speeches. For fifty years, Americans have regarded Eisenhower’s Farewell Address with a mixture of awe and bewilderment. Speaking three nights before the end of his Presidency, in 1961, Eisenhower warned of a “scientific-technological élite” that would dominate public policy, and of a “military-industrial complex” that would claim “our toil, resources, and livelihood.”

<snip>

More: http://www.newyorker.com/talk/2010/12/20/101220ta_talk_newton

:patriot:

:kick:





Refresh | +37 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. kr
i think some of what's going on now is the military-industrial complex duking it out with the finance complex....
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
John1956PA Donating Member (282 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. Also memorable is the following line in his April 16 1953, speech:
“Every gun that’s made, every warship launched, every rocket fired, represents, in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. My very favorite! nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
amerikat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. I use that as my sig line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
John1956PA Donating Member (282 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #7
20. Come to think of it, I probably learned of it from your signature line.
Thanks for using it as your signature line. I may have never learned of it had it not been for you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
amerikat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. Welcome
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. It was not an afterthought, but I believe the tragedy is that he didn't make it earlier
while he had power.

If he had, I believe Nixon would have separated from Ike and the Republican Party may have went in to a sane direction; for a little while longer anyway.




Some historians have regarded the Farewell Address as an afterthought, hastily composed at the end of 1960 as an adjunct to the 1961 State of the Union. Others have regarded it as the soulful expression of an aging President who was determined to warn the American people of dangers ahead. But the Moos papers make clear that the address, far from being an afterthought, was among the most deliberate speeches of Eisenhower’s Presidency. Regarded in his day as inarticulate and detached, Eisenhower in these papers is fully engaged, grappling with the language of the text and the radical questions that it raised.



Thanks for the thread, WillyT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Anytime Uncle Joe, Anytime...
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Poboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
4. recommend.
I LIKE IKE! :patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
FredStembottom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
8. it must have been 30 years ago.....
...that I first read that speech (dredged up by Harper's, I think....). I couldn't believe it!

Eisenhower said that?

I fully expected the speech to sink away forever. It was so obvious back in the 80's that we were launching out full-tilt to become the very America he warned of in that speech. And for awhile, as Morning in America exploded into full meth-like exuberance, the speech did sink.

But somehow it has clung to life. And the combination of scathing truth coming from the mouth of the (supposed) spokes-person for milque-toast, Dwight Eisenhower, still amazes and astounds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
9. I like Ike, too
always did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Goldstein1984 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
10. Link to Ike's speech
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Poboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. video-Eisenhower Farewell Address
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Goldstein1984 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Thanks!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Turbineguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
11. I was discussing this issue with a British friend.
Edited on Sat Dec-11-10 03:11 PM by Turbineguy
During the time of Nelson, there was some relationship between the amount spent on the Navy and the amount of trade that was carried on British ships.

At this time such an economic relationship does not exist. Warmaking is an industry, pure and simple. It's not even driven by policy as the policy seems to be altered to suit the needs of the Military, the Lobbyists and Defense companies (or in some cases egotistical Presidents).

What we spend on a single aircraft carrier could buy a fleet of 80 container-ships. For comparison, we now have 57 US Flag container-ships in foreign trade. And the ships would pay for themselves instead of being a complete hole in the water in which to pour money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
13. Operation PAPERCLIP
Got your "scientific-technological élite" right here.

Thank you for a great OP and thread, WillyT. KBR.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. You Are Quite Welcome, Octafish !!!
:bounce:

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. hey Octafish...there was a thread the other day about how the US
protected Gestapo agents...and I was wondering if you knew of other projects other than Paperclip that involved the assimilation of nazi elite into US organizations. or, did Paperclip encompass all areas of "elite" -- i've always thought of it as being aimed at engineers and scientists.

i'll prolly find the answer in your link...looking now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. PAPERCLIP was, ostensibly, science types.
Edited on Sat Dec-11-10 05:15 PM by Octafish
Other NAZI war criminals got out via the RATLINES, the ODESSA and the CIA (which used the "Eastern Spy Network" in the Cold War).

Here's a bit (jangled and confused, per my normal style, but filled with links, names and dates for easy GOOGLE}:

Know your BFEE: Spawn of Wall Street and the Third Reich

Know your BFEE: American Children Used in Radiation Experiments

Know your BFEE: Reinhard Gehlen

Know your BFEE: Eugenics and the NAZIs - The California Connection

Know your BFEE: Nazis couldn’t win WWII, so they backed Bushes.

A fact curiously missing from American history and any mention of the Warren Commission

Of course, we also forgave the Japanese war criminal scientists in exchange for their data and their military bosses for their gold.

The Pentagon and the Japanese Mengele: The Abominable Dr. Ishii

Proud to report there's a certain redundancy to the above, stretching from our slaveholding south to the present day.

Edit: Replaced this link.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. wow -- thanks! i'm going thru these now.
looks like there was plenty of non-science importation of nazis, but the effort just wasn't given a name.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
panzerfaust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
17. I Like Ike (he is the first president that I remember)



Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
18. Ike on youtube -- THEFT
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-slzNi2fWzo

So good to hear his voice and words..... I was a child then, but it means a lot now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
felix_numinous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
19. Want to know where most of the money goes?
Edited on Sat Dec-11-10 04:17 PM by felix_numinous
To the MIC, who get unlimited funds. Most of the UFOs and mind blowing high tech devices belong to them.

Check out these videos:
part one: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7edgqHbWCUU&feature=related
part two: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-dQNHFEliUI&feature=related

An interesting simulation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
24. Evening Kick !!!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
25. Thanks for this
Rec
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. For You malaise... Anything !!!
:D

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. Back at you
:fistbump:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
26. Anyone notice that modern day GOPers NEVER mention Ike?
My guess is the speech.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Lucinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
28. This is the third time (at least) in the past week that Eisenhower has come up at DU
Thanks for the post. Interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Hawkowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 03:49 AM
Response to Original message
30. Ike was a bigger liberal than Clinton
And he makes Obama look like Herbert Hoover.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Sherman A1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 04:05 AM
Response to Original message
31. Thanks for Posting
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Jan 03rd 2025, 12:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC