Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. Army wargaming "large-scale economic breakdown" inside the USA

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Truth2Tell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 06:59 PM
Original message
U.S. Army wargaming "large-scale economic breakdown" inside the USA
Refresh | +42 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Edweird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. Posse Comitatus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
tkmorris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Exactly my thought
This would be like me practicing robbing a bank. Why would I practice doing something against the law?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Spider Jerusalem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
35. Not applicable if Congress declares martial law in the face of widespread civil disorder...
and the breakdown of civil authority.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 07:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. Hold it... I have been accused of NOT getting it
and that we would never see this...

Is DOD readying my posts?

Oh and they are also talking of Imperial Collapse...

My lord... TRENDS, and apparently the people at DOD live in the same fantasy I live in.

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
RKP5637 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Trends!!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Their plan includes less money in the budget
and retrenchment. They see it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Ikonoklast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #4
53. Science!!
Sorry. This thread is full of silliness, I had to do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
RKP5637 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #53
55. Yep, in the big picture I would be concerned if they were not doing contingency planning. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #2
41. Maybe they are finally reading Chalmers Johnson's books? Or Kunstler?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 01:03 AM
Response to Reply #41
59. Paul Kennedy for that matter!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Mojorabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 07:05 PM
Response to Original message
3. That is not encouraging news. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Nope, no military practices for shit
unless they see it in the horizon.

Ok, let me correct this... no military wargames internal conflict in a serious manner unless they see it coming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #6
51. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
5. Ominous as it sounds, I bet this isn't a new thing.
They war game everything they can think of.

Having said that....sleep tight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
OneGrassRoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. I recall discussions about this during the Katrina disaster...

That the DOD was running "wargame" scenarios in the event of societal breakdown. It was the first time I had heard the term Posse Comitatus, so I remember those discussions.



Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Bluerthanblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. I bet you're right-
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #5
16. NORCOM is relatively new
a creature of the Bush Administration.

So is weakening posse

As they say, there are no coincidences out there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. Well, I won't argue that at all.
But wargaming these types of scenarios is anything but new.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. Yep but NOT making them public
Where this was made public is also not a coincidence. After all this is NOT GMA, but THE PREMIERE business channel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #23
29. Some were public, just not a lot of interest at the time, and no internet to spread them
Edited on Sat Dec-11-10 08:05 PM by Forkboy
I remember reading many such plans/ideas in the 80's under the nuclear exchange scenario (I still can't believe how much of that stuff I read...how to make yourself cynical in one easy step lol).

These days, in the political climate we find ourselves in, these kind of things take on a new meaning. If I come across as trying to downplay this it's not my intention. I'm glad people are taking this in the context of our times. It was scary back in the 80's, let alone in this day and age.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Sherman A1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #5
27. Precisely
This is hardly a new thing or new idea. They plan, wargame on all sorts of scenarios. There are plans somewhere to invade Canada, the UK and every other country in the world. Planning & gaming out those scenarios & plans is part of what they do.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
undergroundpanther Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 05:26 AM
Response to Reply #5
60. They wargamed 9/11 too
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ReadTomPaine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
9. This story is intended to intimidate and chill future protest.
Edited on Sat Dec-11-10 07:19 PM by ReadTomPaine
The govt. is letting us know they have guns and, unlike the Brits, they aren't afraid to use them on the population if the citizenry starts to push back.

I wonder who will blink first.



Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Except where this ran
Edited on Sat Dec-11-10 07:23 PM by nadinbrzezinski
CNBC, this is for the benefit of business.

See we are making sure you will be protected in case the rabble revolts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
thatgemguy Donating Member (337 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #9
36. The side that fires
The side that fires the first shot, loses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
dgibby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #36
64. Yep! Fort Sumpter comes to mind. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
11. Good God... If that is not the most frightening headline I've seen...
I don't mean to be overly dramatic in pointing this out, but at the point all hell breaks loose, much of the public will have little to lose in putting their lives on the line through violent revolt. If there is no economic safety net, no health care access, no future for millions, risking death becomes a much more viable option. This frightens the hell out of me. I'm glad my parents and grandparents never lived to see this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
FarCenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
14. They need to plan for the possibility of a sudden cutoff of oil imports, for example
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Sherman A1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #14
28. They have done so and will continue to do so
It's all part of the process of planning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
15. DOOOOOOooOOOOMED!
See! I Told You!

DooooooooOOOOOOOoooooooooooooooooooooOOOOMED!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Truth2Tell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #15
22. What? No illistration?
Why doesn't my thread merit a pic with your meme? :shrug:

I have to say, I feel a bit slighted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #22
37. Here you go.


Sorry for the oversight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Truth2Tell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #37
40. Thank you.
Though the lovin' is never as special if you have to beg for it. :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #40
43. ***
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
cwydro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 07:31 PM
Response to Original message
17. Gosh
and we all thought the Chimp was the one who would do that...surely that would not happen under a Democratic president????

How things have changed.

That being said...the military wargames just about everything - I was declared "dead" in a nuclear attack at a base in upstate NY back in the 70's. Still have my "dead" sticker.

But there have been no nuclear attacks in upstate NY. That base was trashed by a rock concert in the 90's...but there was no radioactive fallout that I know of.

So just because they train for it does not mean it will happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 07:41 PM
Response to Original message
18. If there is a nonzero probability of civil unrest would you have state militias augmented by federal
troops be totally unprepared?

How do you interpret the Constitution's direction to Congress in Article I?
Section. 8.

The Congress shall have Power

* * * * * * * *

To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;

To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;

Given specific definitions in 10 USC 311 you could be part of that militia:
§ 311. Militia: composition and classes
(a) The militia of the United States consists of all able-bodied males at least 17 years of age and, except as provided in section 313 of title 32, under 45 years of age who are, or who have made a declaration of intention to become, citizens of the United States and of female citizens of the United States who are members of the National Guard.

(b) The classes of the militia are—

(1) the organized militia, which consists of the National Guard and the Naval Militia; and

(2) the unorganized militia, which consists of the members of the militia who are not members of the National Guard or the Naval Militia.


Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
greytdemocrat Donating Member (614 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 07:41 PM
Response to Original message
19. ***Sigh***
A small part of the story you linked to.

You do realize the military games for countless things like Aruba invading the US.

Right???
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
20. Oh and on NORCOM
http://www.northcom.mil/about/history_education/history.html

Notice when it was created, 2002, under the signature of Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Desertrose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #20
38. speaking of NORTHCOM...
Came across this one today.....

A new report prepared for Prime Minister Putin by the foreign military intelligence directorate (GRU) on the thousands of secret documents belonging to the United States leaked by the European whistleblower site WikiLeaks says that President Obama and US Secretary of Defense Robert Gates were put into what the Americans call their “2012 ALICE Bunker” last December (2009) after the mysterious appearance of what has become known as the “Norway Spiral”.

Now according to this report, the US Embassy in Oslo, Norway, sent a “Top Secret” cable to “USNORTHCOM” stating the following:

Ҧ1. (S) RNoAF response to HAARP/CERN spiral anomaly was limited to 175 km. with testing parameters met within 3degrees of arc access.

¶2. (S) Post recommends activation of 2012 Project ALICE Bunker for POTUS/SECDEF”



FWIW...interesting.....read the article at the link to find out more abut the 2012 Alice Bunker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. I am shocked the GRU does not know this
but...

The US has always had a bunker for the leadership near DC. The one over the cold war had it's cover blown a few years back. It was under a fancy hotel, and they even have had the damn thing on the History Channel.

This new bunker... same shit different day.

But if this was the case, that anomaly was far more serious than we all have been led to believe... and wasn't Clinton there when it happened?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
dgibby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #39
66. It was a massive underground bomb shelter for members of Congress
and their families and staff, located under the West Va. wing of the Greenbrier Hotel and Resort, a 5 star facility in White Sulphur Springs, WV.

The relationship between the Greenbrier and the Govt go way back to WWII, and has been used to house German prisoners,relocated Japanese-Americans, and as a govt. hospital.

It was a favorite destination of Ike's, and I can remember him traveling by train from DC. They'd attach the Presidential Car to the George Washington, the Chesapeake and Ohio's premier passenger train, and he'd wave as the train passed through my hometown. He even stopped there once-probably the most exciting thing that ever happened! (Did I mention it was a very small town?LOL!).

Here's a long, but interesting article about the history of the bunker for anyone who's interested.

http://www.avhub.net/congressionalhideawaygreenbriar.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Mojorabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #38
52. Now that is some interesting reading
I'd love to see a discussion of this!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Desertrose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #52
63. More interesting stuff here...
Edited on Sun Dec-12-10 12:44 PM by Desertrose
at this link.

Lots of articles...take your pick.
The latest blogs/articles are on the right on the Homepage.

Norway Spiral was clearly more than what the MSM told us.

For the folks who thought this was all :tinfoilhat: ...hey, maybe not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
sasha031 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
24. this is so depressing and scary
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
25. To put it simply..
When we bailed out the banks, we took a private debt crisis and turned it into a sovereign debt crisis by transferring toxic junk onto the public balance sheet, thereby ratcheting up the deficit, but meanwhile our productive economy has been gutted. The end game which we are now approaching involves currency debasement and a sudden collapse in the value of all illiquid assets. The bond crash is already here, with equities and commodities possibly to follow.

The Army isn't alone preparing for this outcome. Here's the book friends with money are clamoring for right now:

http://cgi.ebay.com/Penniless-Billionaires-Shapiro-Inflation-History-/190477102335?pt=US_Nonfiction_Book&hash=item2c5951ecff
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
sasha031 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #25
30. may be a stupid question, not as versed as you
why would WH want to put more debt on us then:wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #30
57. Not a stupid question.
My guess is short-termism. All of the moves they make seem designed to kick the can a little further down the road. Letting the tax cuts expire would pull a lot of money out of the economy in the immediate term, which could create some amount of deflation and that is what the Fed has been firing off its bazooka to prevent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #25
33. in that vein, here's a scary article:
Deflationists Take Note: Bernanke Succeeds In Offsetting Shadow Banking Collapse
Submitted by Tyler Durden on 12/11/2010 16:29 -0500

Ben BernankeCitadelConvexityFederal ReserveM2M3Monetary AggregatesMonetary PolicyNegative ConvexityShadow Banking


The biggest piece of news in Thursday's Z1 statement was not that consumers continue to deleverage, that corporate cash levels are at $1.9 trillion (of which $1 trillion is financial and half of the rest is held offshore: maybe instead of copying Zero Hedge charts, the WSJ could have actually focused on the story behind the headlines) or that the stock market continues to be the only manipulated delta in household net worth (even as wealth in real terms is dropping). A far more relevant and important data highlight has to do with the only thing that actually matters for the reflation of the monetary bubble: namely the fact that the contraction in the shadow banking system is continuing. Or so was the conventional wisdom. As of September 30, Bernanke has successfully stopped the net decline of monetary aggregates even when including the massive shadow banking system.

As we have long claimed, every action by the Fed, every attempt at reflation, every bond purchase directly, and ES purchase indirectly courtesy of Citadel, have had the sole goal of counteracting the impact of the the collapsing shadow banking liabilities. Compared to shadow liabilities, which topped out at $21 trillion in March of 2008, all other monetary aggregates are irrelevant: this includes both their representation in bank balance sheets, such as traditional banking liabilities and the broadest representation of money stock tracked by the Fed, M2 (since as of 2006 M3 is no longer tracked due to the egregious costs of keeping track of this data). And the biggest, and so far most credible, argument that deflationists have had, is that the shadow banking system, and its reconstructed M3 proxy is plunging far faster than Bernanke is reflating other parallel aggregates. Well, that is now over. As of Q3 2009, the sequential change in shadow and traditional bank liabilities was net positive by $3.8 billion: this is the first time this number has posted an increase since December 2008! This fact should send a wedge of terror into the hearts of all those, both deflationists and inflationsts, who realize the significance of this inflection point: it appears that Bernanke has finally succeeded at offsetting the drop in the shadow banking system.

Up until now the one and only defense that those who anticipate continued asset price declines was that on a net basis, the monetary system was still contracting. That is now no longer the case. And now, ironically, all that remains is for a very much cornered Ben Bernanke to convince people that the economy is getting better, resulting in a surge in net borrowings, and a spike in monetary velocity, and... hello Weimar.


http://www.zerohedge.com/article/deflationists-take-note-bernanke-succeeds-offsetting-shadow-banking-collapse?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
26. How do you have a new cold war with a country
that you owe gazillions?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #26
31. My friend read between the lines
no you don't.

They are preparing for Imperial Collapse... and every one of them comes with a lot of internal pain.

Good news, they know it's coming, bad news, they know it's coming.

But telling the business world we are 'bout to retrench the Empire is not good. So tehy are dressing this in what they will have to do anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #31
61. We know it's coming too
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
sasha031 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #26
32. I know...
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 08:18 PM
Response to Original message
34. Perhaps they'll realize this is a game with no winners.
And report to their civilian commanders accordingly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
tblue37 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
42. If the government, acting as house guard for the super-rich,
would quit ripping off the middle class, they wouldn't have to plan for a full scale economic breakdown leading to violent civil unrest!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
sarcasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 09:02 PM
Response to Original message
44. For when the unemploymen benefits of millions run out, kick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
upi402 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
45. inside defense DOT com - US Army "unified quest 20100"
I wonder if this is another scare tactic, "new cold war with China" - or is this for real?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
bear425 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
46. Unified Quest 2011?!!!!
Sounds as if it's named with the goal being military control by the PTB.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
47. They better be wargaming one more scenario
And that's the "Second Amendment Remedy" scenario: the one where the teabaggers find out the people they worked so hard to elect don't fix the country at all--much less in the way they want it fixed--and start shooting people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Truth2Tell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #47
49. Or who knows...
maybe the TeaBaggers were invented to be a trigger. :tinfoilhat:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
48. The Army would derelict of duty if it didn't do such gaming.
They should game an invasion from Mars, too. And Yosemite exploding. And an asteroid collision.

No, I'm not being sarcastic. If we can dream it, they need to game it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #48
62. True enough
We in the "healthcare" realm need to be doing more of those sorts of drills. We have had far too few of them in my 20 years in the game.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Sen. Walter Sobchak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 10:35 PM
Response to Original message
50. except, in a total economic breakdown the military will be the first institution to fail
$$$!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #50
56. Contractors and robots are expensive!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
54. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Taitertots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 12:48 AM
Response to Original message
58. The Military is planning a war against us
"Large-Scale economic breakdown" = Revolution made inevitable by systemic injustice
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
L0oniX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
65. Do ya still support the troops?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
shanti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
67. to all the naysayers:
when some of us have posted about Rex 84...toldja :( it's not a conspiracy theory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Dec 22nd 2024, 03:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC