|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Truth2Tell
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 06:59 PM Original message |
U.S. Army wargaming "large-scale economic breakdown" inside the USA |
Refresh | +42 Recommendations | Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Edweird
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 07:01 PM Response to Original message |
1. Posse Comitatus. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
tkmorris
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 07:10 PM Response to Reply #1 |
8. Exactly my thought |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Spider Jerusalem
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 08:22 PM Response to Reply #1 |
35. Not applicable if Congress declares martial law in the face of widespread civil disorder... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 07:05 PM Response to Original message |
2. Hold it... I have been accused of NOT getting it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
RKP5637
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 07:06 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. Trends!!! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 07:08 PM Response to Reply #4 |
7. Their plan includes less money in the budget |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Ikonoklast
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 10:42 PM Response to Reply #4 |
53. Science!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
RKP5637
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 10:53 PM Response to Reply #53 |
55. Yep, in the big picture I would be concerned if they were not doing contingency planning. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
jwirr
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 08:45 PM Response to Reply #2 |
41. Maybe they are finally reading Chalmers Johnson's books? Or Kunstler? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 01:03 AM Response to Reply #41 |
59. Paul Kennedy for that matter! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Mojorabbit
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 07:05 PM Response to Original message |
3. That is not encouraging news. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 07:07 PM Response to Reply #3 |
6. Nope, no military practices for shit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 10:41 PM Response to Reply #6 |
51. Deleted message |
Forkboy
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 07:06 PM Response to Original message |
5. Ominous as it sounds, I bet this isn't a new thing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
OneGrassRoot
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 07:27 PM Response to Reply #5 |
12. I recall discussions about this during the Katrina disaster... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Bluerthanblue
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 07:27 PM Response to Reply #5 |
13. I bet you're right- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 07:29 PM Response to Reply #5 |
16. NORCOM is relatively new |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Forkboy
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 07:48 PM Response to Reply #16 |
21. Well, I won't argue that at all. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 07:54 PM Response to Reply #21 |
23. Yep but NOT making them public |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Forkboy
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 08:05 PM Response to Reply #23 |
29. Some were public, just not a lot of interest at the time, and no internet to spread them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Sherman A1
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 08:04 PM Response to Reply #5 |
27. Precisely |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
undergroundpanther
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 05:26 AM Response to Reply #5 |
60. They wargamed 9/11 too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
ReadTomPaine
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 07:18 PM Response to Original message |
9. This story is intended to intimidate and chill future protest. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 07:23 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. Except where this ran |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
thatgemguy
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 08:25 PM Response to Reply #9 |
36. The side that fires |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
dgibby
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 01:20 PM Response to Reply #36 |
64. Yep! Fort Sumpter comes to mind. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
hlthe2b
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 07:26 PM Response to Original message |
11. Good God... If that is not the most frightening headline I've seen... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
FarCenter
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 07:27 PM Response to Original message |
14. They need to plan for the possibility of a sudden cutoff of oil imports, for example |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Sherman A1
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 08:05 PM Response to Reply #14 |
28. They have done so and will continue to do so |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Warren DeMontague
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 07:29 PM Response to Original message |
15. DOOOOOOooOOOOMED! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Truth2Tell
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 07:49 PM Response to Reply #15 |
22. What? No illistration? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Warren DeMontague
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 08:27 PM Response to Reply #22 |
37. Here you go. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Truth2Tell
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 08:40 PM Response to Reply #37 |
40. Thank you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Warren DeMontague
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 08:55 PM Response to Reply #40 |
43. *** |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
cwydro
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 07:31 PM Response to Original message |
17. Gosh |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
jody
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 07:41 PM Response to Original message |
18. If there is a nonzero probability of civil unrest would you have state militias augmented by federal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
greytdemocrat
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 07:41 PM Response to Original message |
19. ***Sigh*** |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 07:44 PM Response to Original message |
20. Oh and on NORCOM |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Desertrose
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 08:27 PM Response to Reply #20 |
38. speaking of NORTHCOM... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 08:35 PM Response to Reply #38 |
39. I am shocked the GRU does not know this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
dgibby
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 02:00 PM Response to Reply #39 |
66. It was a massive underground bomb shelter for members of Congress |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Mojorabbit
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 10:41 PM Response to Reply #38 |
52. Now that is some interesting reading |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Desertrose
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 12:43 PM Response to Reply #52 |
63. More interesting stuff here... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
sasha031
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 07:55 PM Response to Original message |
24. this is so depressing and scary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
girl gone mad
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 08:01 PM Response to Original message |
25. To put it simply.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
sasha031
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 08:05 PM Response to Reply #25 |
30. may be a stupid question, not as versed as you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
girl gone mad
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 11:24 PM Response to Reply #30 |
57. Not a stupid question. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
amborin
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 08:17 PM Response to Reply #25 |
33. in that vein, here's a scary article: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
malaise
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 08:03 PM Response to Original message |
26. How do you have a new cold war with a country |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 08:05 PM Response to Reply #26 |
31. My friend read between the lines |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
tavalon
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 09:05 AM Response to Reply #31 |
61. We know it's coming too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
sasha031
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 08:05 PM Response to Reply #26 |
32. I know... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
glitch
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 08:18 PM Response to Original message |
34. Perhaps they'll realize this is a game with no winners. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
tblue37
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 08:50 PM Response to Original message |
42. If the government, acting as house guard for the super-rich, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
sarcasmo
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 09:02 PM Response to Original message |
44. For when the unemploymen benefits of millions run out, kick. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
upi402
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 09:12 PM Response to Original message |
45. inside defense DOT com - US Army "unified quest 20100" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
bear425
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 09:34 PM Response to Original message |
46. Unified Quest 2011?!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
jmowreader
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 09:37 PM Response to Original message |
47. They better be wargaming one more scenario |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Truth2Tell
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 09:59 PM Response to Reply #47 |
49. Or who knows... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Stinky The Clown
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 09:54 PM Response to Original message |
48. The Army would derelict of duty if it didn't do such gaming. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
tavalon
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 09:07 AM Response to Reply #48 |
62. True enough |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Sen. Walter Sobchak
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 10:35 PM Response to Original message |
50. except, in a total economic breakdown the military will be the first institution to fail |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 10:55 PM Response to Reply #50 |
56. Contractors and robots are expensive! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sat Dec-11-10 10:45 PM Response to Original message |
54. Deleted message |
Taitertots
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 12:48 AM Response to Original message |
58. The Military is planning a war against us |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
L0oniX
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 01:20 PM Response to Original message |
65. Do ya still support the troops? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
shanti
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 02:02 PM Response to Original message |
67. to all the naysayers: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Mon May 05th 2025, 03:33 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC