|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
nashville_brook
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 11:40 AM Original message |
Holy Crap: Obama's losing support; Romney would beat him now |
Refresh | +22 Recommendations | Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Skink
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 11:43 AM Response to Original message |
1. We got Romney care anyway why not make it official. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
TheKentuckian
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 11:44 AM Response to Original message |
2. Uh oh, you're hitting a favored meme |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
nashville_brook
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 11:55 AM Response to Reply #2 |
12. How so? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
TheKentuckian
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 08:36 PM Response to Reply #12 |
72. That a primary would destroy the party and hurt our chances of repelling the TeaPubliKlans |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
polichick
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 11:44 AM Response to Original message |
3. Well duh - wonder if he's happy now. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
DrDan
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 11:44 AM Response to Original message |
4. I can't imagine what he has done to cause that . . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Scurrilous
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 11:46 AM Response to Original message |
5. K & R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Karmadillo
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 11:48 AM Response to Original message |
6. La la la la la la la la la la la la la la la la la la la la la la la la la la la GOBAMA! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Aramchek
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 12:35 PM Response to Reply #6 |
31. put your money where your mouth is and particpate in my fund DU Fund Drive |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
LAGC
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 07:26 PM Response to Reply #31 |
71. Your thread was locked. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 11:50 AM Response to Original message |
7. Romney 2012! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
nashville_brook
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 11:54 AM Response to Reply #7 |
10. This is exactly what we've been saying since the HCR debate - rightward drift hurts the party |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
John Q. Citizen
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 12:23 PM Response to Reply #10 |
20. i know I've said it, repeatedly. We tried to warn people but they seemed oblivious or even hostile |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
nashville_brook
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 12:26 PM Response to Reply #20 |
21. Yes, I know. Those warnings have been called "ponies" in the past, but maybe we're beyond that now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Laelth
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 01:01 PM Response to Reply #10 |
40. Spot on. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 11:58 AM Response to Reply #7 |
14. Deleted message |
nashville_brook
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 12:02 PM Response to Reply #14 |
15. In terms of party viability, the best we can hope for is a tea party indie challenge.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 12:21 PM Response to Reply #14 |
19. This poll is nonsense. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
nashville_brook
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 12:27 PM Response to Reply #19 |
22. Can you elaborate on the instrument's shortcomings? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
emulatorloo
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 12:31 PM Response to Reply #22 |
26. Historical Precedent. Clinton and Reagan had similar poll results midway in first term |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
nashville_brook
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 12:43 PM Response to Reply #26 |
34. So, it's not the instrument...it's the certainty that history is written. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
emulatorloo
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 01:04 PM Response to Reply #34 |
41. ProSense also points out MOE, and questions about Romney's nomination |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
nashville_brook
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 02:06 PM Response to Reply #41 |
51. he'll need to push back against that "Republican Control 101" in order to benefit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 12:46 PM Response to Reply #22 |
37. Here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
leeroysphitz
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 01:07 PM Response to Reply #37 |
43. Way to miss the point... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
nashville_brook
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 02:09 PM Response to Reply #37 |
52. of the three, you are most likely correct on only one...that Romney isn't the likely nominee |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Edweird
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 03:46 PM Response to Reply #19 |
61. I guess we'll see in two years, won't we? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Smashcut
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 03:05 PM Response to Reply #7 |
53. Maybe Obama could be his running mate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
bullwinkle428
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 11:50 AM Response to Original message |
8. ZOMG...HE MUST MOVE FURTHER TO THE RIGHT!!1!1! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
BeyondGeography
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 11:53 AM Response to Original message |
9. The R's would really have to hold their nose to nominate Romney |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 11:54 AM Response to Original message |
11. Great strategy. Pander to the right, alienate the left. Except it doesn't work. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
nashville_brook
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 04:24 PM Response to Reply #11 |
65. this is what happens when a leader is surrounded by "yes men" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
stillwaiting
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 11:56 AM Response to Original message |
13. It's because of his leftist, liberal positions. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
krabigirl
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 12:12 PM Response to Original message |
16. Romney and Obama have nearly identical positions on most things. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Tesha
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 12:33 PM Response to Reply #16 |
28. But Romney is an actual Republican and will garner Republican votes. (NT) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
emulatorloo
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 01:06 PM Response to Reply #28 |
42. I don't think he is insane enough for today's Republican Voter. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Edweird
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 03:32 PM Response to Reply #16 |
57. So you're saying Romney is a "liberal" and a "progressive" just like Obama? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Lorien
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 08:42 PM Response to Reply #57 |
73. How is Obama a liberal or Progressive? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Edweird
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 09:44 PM Response to Reply #73 |
76. Here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Bluerthanblue
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 12:19 PM Response to Original message |
17. yeah, with support like this, who needs enemies- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
nashville_brook
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 04:59 PM Response to Reply #17 |
66. it's just data -- do with it what you will. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Cleita
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 12:19 PM Response to Original message |
18. I'd rather have a real Republican to blame for policy than a |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
nashville_brook
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 12:31 PM Response to Reply #18 |
25. Yes indeed, because we're seeing the demise of the entire Democratic brand. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 12:36 PM Response to Reply #18 |
32. Deleted message |
GoCubsGo
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 12:29 PM Response to Original message |
23. So? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Tesha
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 12:44 PM Response to Reply #23 |
35. Were all the warnings ahead of 2010 meaningless as well? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
RZM
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 01:08 PM Response to Reply #35 |
44. 4 years ago |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
GoCubsGo
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 01:23 PM Response to Reply #44 |
48. Exactly right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Tesha
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 03:18 PM Response to Reply #44 |
54. The point, though, is that there are Republicans who defeat our incumbent. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
RZM
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 03:32 PM Response to Reply #54 |
56. I'm not saying Obama will waltz back into the White House in 2012 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
GoCubsGo
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 01:21 PM Response to Reply #35 |
47. People said Harry Reid was toast, too. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
emulatorloo
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 12:30 PM Response to Original message |
24. Clinton and Reagan were supposed to lose bigtime too, per pundits and polls |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Nay
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 12:33 PM Response to Original message |
27. Just once, I'd like a president's "strategy" to be to help the American people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Bluerthanblue
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 12:50 PM Response to Reply #27 |
38. until they can count on the support of the Dem's in the house and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 12:34 PM Response to Original message |
29. Deleted message |
nashville_brook
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 12:46 PM Response to Reply #29 |
36. Ignore the approval ratings if you like, and enjoy the Palin presidency -- :) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
RUMMYisFROSTED
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 12:35 PM Response to Original message |
30. Right up until Romney opens his yapper. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
nashville_brook
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 02:04 PM Response to Reply #30 |
50. Romney = generic establishment Republican |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Lucian
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 12:38 PM Response to Original message |
33. And this is surprising...how? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Edweird
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 03:24 PM Response to Reply #33 |
55. "Given the choice between a Republican and someone who acts like a Republican, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
elocs
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 12:54 PM Response to Original message |
39. Except, the election is not "now". I don't believe Romney will even get the Republican nomination. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
suston96
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 01:13 PM Response to Original message |
45. Holy crap: Obama's approval rating among independents increasing..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
nashville_brook
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 01:18 PM Response to Reply #45 |
46. read the whole article...Romney beats Obama among indies... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
MrMickeysMom
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 01:27 PM Response to Original message |
49. My future bumper sticker... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
lefthandedlefty
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 03:35 PM Response to Original message |
58. Wouldn`t surprise me if Obama doesn`t even run in 2012 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Lorien
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 08:48 PM Response to Reply #58 |
74. As a candidate he dropped hints that he wouldn't run for a second term |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Initech
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 03:39 PM Response to Original message |
59. Gag, I do not want to live in a country where the American Taliban has control. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
moondust
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 03:39 PM Response to Original message |
60. And the "close race" corporate media narrative begins. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
andym
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 03:46 PM Response to Original message |
62. He's finally losing mainstream liberal support |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
mmonk
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 04:00 PM Response to Original message |
63. Even after he passed his healthcare bill, he would lose to him? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Scurrilous
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 04:19 PM Response to Original message |
64. Holy Crap Kick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
GeorgeGist
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 06:14 PM Response to Original message |
67. Not Holy ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
nashville_brook
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 07:10 PM Response to Reply #67 |
68. Country crap? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Orsino
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 07:19 PM Response to Original message |
69. Sure. All it would take is moving Election Day... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
nashville_brook
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 08:48 PM Response to Reply #69 |
75. these sorts of polls are useful for determining trends, they're not literal. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
democrat2thecore
![]() |
Sun Dec-12-10 07:19 PM Response to Original message |
70. And this poll was before the press conference debacle - he looked weak & pathetic - and then walked |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Mon May 05th 2025, 02:51 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC