Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

teachers got sold down the river in the tax deal

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 11:46 AM
Original message
teachers got sold down the river in the tax deal
In most northern and western states teachers do not pay into Social Security but have a seperate retirement plan. In most southern states teachers do pay into Social Security and have a seperate retirement plan as well. I am a southern teacher but my northern peers are important too. Those teachers will lose making work pay, for which many of them qualified, and not have it replaced by the Social Security tax cut. On top of that, they lose the $250 deduction for classroom expenses. That will translate to either a $650 or $1050 tax increase for a single, or married teacher. I actually gain a bit since I lose $650 but gain just about $1000. Many teachers are already pissed off over education policy, now a tax bill in which virtually everyone but them gets a tax cut. Might be nice to get the educator expense added back in with the ethonal tax credits.
Refresh | +14 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
1. Yes, That Would Be Nice
Thank You.:hug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
2. PA. teachers pay into S.S. BTW: DU's BH, DT. There are only 14 states applicable to the OP:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Kalyke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. So, since there are only 14 states included, we're supposed to
look the other way and not give a flying fuck about the teachers in those 14 states?

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
enlightenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Apparently.
The excuses for this mess grow more absurd every hour.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #4
16.  I'm suggesting the OP be less imprecise. DO YOU MIND?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Kalyke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. Then say that instead of implying that it doesn't matter because
Edited on Sun Dec-12-10 01:02 PM by Kalyke
it only effects 14 states.

And I do mind when people are acting like dillweeds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. I will admit it is fewer than I thought
but still given that say Ohio might be important in the Presidential election it might behoove us to solve this problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #6
23. it looks to me that those 14 states contain
at least 40% of the U.S. population. I just added up their populations from a 2003 road atlas and may have forgotten Connecticut and then divided by 300 million and got 39.59 or so. Any list that includes California, Texas, Ohio, and Masschusetts covers a lot of people.

However, I am surprised that those teachers were covered by the Making Work Pay credit because that was supposed to be based on FICA taxes. Or is that just because teachers make enough money that they were paying taxes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. So it's not as large a problem as suspected. That's good.
It needs to be corrected in these 14 states. It's a dumb policy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
3. Explicit campaign promise broken. No one who makes under $200,000 a year will see their taxes...
Edited on Sun Dec-12-10 12:01 PM by laughingliberal
go up one dime. Not one dime. Promise broken.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Donna Zen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
7. Because I worked
I worked hard to get through college, and I worked hard after college; however, I wasn't teaching. I qualify to get SS, but because I will retire from teaching in a state that doesn't allow me to collect SS, I'm screwed.

The amount of my retirement will force me into the cat food line; therefore, I can't retire.

Yes, I am among those who will see my taxes go up, but I'm fighting against this tax bill because it weakens SS. Something in me believes in the greater good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
oldhippie Donating Member (355 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Please tell me how a state can prevent you from collecting SS ....
.... when you say you are qualified to get it? How does that work?

My SS payment is reduced substantially since I receive another govt pension, but since I qualify for SS I can still get a little (about 40%) of what I qualified for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Donna Zen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. My SS...
I'm qualified because of having worked other jobs. With teachers' retirement in my state being so meager and the SS outset being greater than what I might receive, I will not collect SS. Nada. Also, in my state, Maine, retired teachers only received 35% of paid health care.

I checked out everything this past summer. Believe me when I tell you that I am screwed.

Oh, and Wall Street took about 40% of our savings when they went on their gambling spree. We did without plenty to build up that nest egg, but I may as well gone out and bought diamonds and ball gowns. Now I learn that I will be losing the little deduction for all of the money that I spend on my classroom...books, paper, pens and pencils...the works.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. What do you mean by 'SS outset'?
Do they deduct your SS from your retirement check?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Donna Zen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. Sorry
I meant "offset".

Yes, the state deducts the amt. and I never get SS only the retirement.

Look, I talked to both the fed office and my state office.

I'm not sure why Maine hates its teachers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Donna Zen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. Sorry
I meant "offset".

Yes, the state deducts the amt. and I never get SS only the retirement.

Look, I talked to both the fed office and my state office.

I'm not sure why Maine hates its teachers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
YvonneCa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #15
21. Could the poster mean the WEP/GPO Offset...
...enacted in the 80's ? GPO Government Pension Offset. WEP Windfall Elimination Provision. CTA and other unions have wanted to overturn these for years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
oldhippie Donating Member (355 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. I fall under the WEP, and that's why my SS is reduced ...
I would qualify for about $950/mo in SS based on what I paid in for the years I worked in jobs covered by SS. But since I have a govt pension also, I only get about $380/mo max of SS. Even though I paid into SS for many years, they figure I don't "need" the full benefit I thought I had earned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
YvonneCa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. Same here. A person who worked and paid in to SS...
Edited on Sun Dec-12-10 02:36 PM by YvonneCa
...for the same number of years as I can collect that full amount...even if they chose to stay home during all the years I returned to school, earned a teaching credential, and worked hard on the behalf of my students (and my own personal children, BTW) and the state educational system. My SS benefit is cut by 60%, although it does qualify me for Medicare :7 (assuming it's still around).

That's fairness for you. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. You can't collect SS even though you contributed on your previous job?
How can you be prevented from collecting if you already have an account??
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
10. We lost our $250 deduction?
I was told it was in the compromise. My congressman told me. Are you sure they took it out?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. I hope you are right
I haven't seen it listed anywhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. I was told it was still there.
It's all pretty confusing however.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. If it is in there that is very helpful
frankly I come out better even without it but I still oppose the SS cut both because it leaves out both those teachers and harms poor people but also because it is a potential huge problem for SS in the future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Dec 22nd 2024, 03:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC