Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Now They're Trying To Rehabilitate The Bush Presidency

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ChoppinBroccoli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-10 11:28 AM
Original message
Now They're Trying To Rehabilitate The Bush Presidency
Edited on Mon Dec-13-10 11:29 AM by ChoppinBroccoli
It would seem that the right-wing is now emboldened by the fact that they won a few seats in the Congress recently, their hero Fredo Bush has released a book, and the fact that he is able to brag in a national TV interview about committing war crimes and not be prosecuted for it. And now it looks like they're trying to take back Bush's legacy as President too, with........you guessed it............more lies. I found this steaming pile of horse excrement in the "Letters to the Editor" section of one of my local newspapers. Since I'm certain that most right-wingers are incapable of having an original thought, I was hoping that some other posters may have encountered similar letters in their own newspapers (as I'm sure this is just another set of "marching orders" handed down from on high). Last week, this local newspaper printed a review of the movie "Fair Game," and this particular reader got offended. Why? Because of all the lies in the movie. Big lies. You know, well-documented lies like the ones about how there weren't any WMDs in Iraq. I know, right? Just get a load of this nonsense (reprinted verbatim for your reading pleasure):


"Progressives need to check their facts about WMDs:

Chad Dull's review of the movie 'Fair Game' needs some fact-checking.

Dull states that, 'Wilson's assertion that there was no evidence to support the charge that Niger sold yellow-cake uranium to Iraq, thus weakening the Bush administration's case for the invasion of Iraq.'

The Bush administration charged that Iraq sought yellow cake from Niger.

The Akashat (Iraq) mine produced uranium ore. Al Qaim (Iraq) produced refined yellow cake uranium ore. Iraq had an extensive nuclear program in all aspects. (emphasis mine)

In addition to the extensive nuclear program, Iraq had all kinds of weapons of mass destruction. To educate yourself, read Iraq General (retired) George Sada's book 'Saddam's Secrets' in which he and Iraqi scientists attest to Saddam's building, buying and seeking WMDs. They spell out how Iraq hid his weapons from the UN and how they secretly removed weapons from Iraq through Syria.

Progressives need to check their 'facts.'

Lou Hirsch
Columbus"
Refresh | +2 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
GSLevel9 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-10 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
1. Fact or fiction it may be... I have 3 words.
Two endless wars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Arctic Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-10 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
2. And the moron who wrote this needs to understand
also, having yellowcake and calling it a nuclear weapons program is like saying you have saltpeter and you have a ballistic missile program.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-10 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
3. Maybe somebody needs to get to work rehabilitating the Obama Presidency. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-10 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
4. 2011 is the anniversary of that old felon Raygun's birth.
It promises to be a good year for President Fredo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ChoppinBroccoli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-10 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
5. Want A Good Laugh?
Check out reviews of the book he cites as his "authority" for all this nonsense. It's written by a guy that the Bush administration doesn't even take seriously. And it was written in 2006. Not to mention the fact that none of the things he claims pass the "smell test." Yeah, they were able to hide an "extensive" nuclear program and "all kinds" of WMDs from teams upon teams upon teams of investigators, and they were able to send everything to Syria without anyone knowing about it. No satellite photos of the transport, no witnesses blabbing, nothing. I also love the twisted logic that just as he was about to be attacked by a country that thoroughly kicked his ass just a few years ago, Saddam sent his extensive arsenal of WMDs AWAY. Just how stupid and gullible do you have to be in order to be a Republican these days, anyway?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Dec 21st 2024, 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC