|
Edited on Tue May-29-07 08:32 AM by welshTerrier2
the fact is that most people sit back in their comfy chair and catch a little news. they are spoon-fed. they eat what they are served.
i ask a family member what they thought about this last Iraq funding bill. the answer? "oh, i didn't hear anything about that." someone on DU just posted that something like 60% of Americans couldn't name the vice president. naming him isn't important. but understanding what he's done is. clearly, they know nothing about that.
you talk to people about the corruption of Big Oil and how it dominates our foreign policy and how it was the real reason we invaded Iraq and they tell me "I'm right there with you on that one." I'm surprised. Then they go on to explain how "I know they could lower those gas prices if they want to." The point is they don't see beyond the pocketbook issue and fail to understand the impact of big money on national policy.
When our institutions are corrupt, they see gas prices. When they finally turn against our involvement in Iraq, it's because bush has failed. The problem is, it's not because we had no right to invade in the first place. The problem is that they don't understand the policy was immoral, it was greedy, it was imperialism. What does that say about what they'll support when the next oil company puppet manufactures a case for war?
We have precious few outlets to let those who are not very interested hear our message. It should be JOB ONE of the Democratic Party to do all they can to educate the public. Do you hear a steady message from the Party about WHY bush invaded Iraq? All you hear is that "we were all duped by the "bad intelligence."" How many leading Democrats call it MANUFACTURED INTELLIGENCE? Again, most Americans are barely paying attention. The Democratic Party, presumably because they see political risks in trying to educate Americans on issues not widely accepted, is failing to do its job.
Look at the recent Goodling hearings. They are so focused on "getting Gonzales" that the only analysis I heard after she testified was about whether Gonzales tried to influence her recollections of events. A good thing to know to be sure. But, they've completely dropped the ball on the much more important point Goodling raised. She testified that Griffin, a key member of the bush/cheney campaign, was involved in vote caging. Vote caging is a technique to block selected people from voting. It's a felony. It is an assault on the very foundation on which this country was founded. It is treason. It is high crimes and misdemeanors. It was completely ignored by the Democratic Party after Goodling's testimony.
The point is, I totally agree with your assessment that far too many citizens lack curiosity and civic responsibility. We cannot function as a democracy with an ill-informed, non-participating citizenry. But, I think it's also important to note that given that state of affairs, it's all the more critical to smash the corporate, centralized control of our MSM and all the more critical for the Democratic Party to stop being so cowardly. If the voters refuse to come to the mountain, we have to do a better job bringing the mountain to them.
for a quiet person, Skidmore, you said a mouthful.
k&r ...
|