Personhood: Is a fetus a Human Being...?

[bliss_eternal]

Personhood: Is a Fetus a Human Being?

by Joyce Arthur (copyright © August 2001)

The main argument of the anti-choice movement boils down to this: a human zygote, blastocyst, embryo, or fetus is a human being with a right to life, and abortion is therefore murder and should be illegal. This assumption is deeply flawed.

At the outset, let me say that from a pro-choice point of view, the status of the fetus is a peripheral issue. Regardless of whether a fetus is a human being or has rights, women will have abortions anyway, even if it means breaking the law or risking their lives. Even women who believe that abortion is murder have chosen to get abortions, and will continue to do so<1>. That's why we should leave the decision up to women’s moral conscience, and make sure that they are provided with safe, legal, accessible abortions. Because ultimately, the status of a fetus is a matter of subjective opinion, and the only opinion that counts is that of the pregnant woman. For example, a happily pregnant woman may feel love for her fetus as a special and unique human being, a welcome and highly anticipated member of her family. She names her fetus, refers to it as a baby, talks to it, and so on. But an unhappily pregnant woman may view her fetus with utter dismay, bordering on revulsion. She cannot bring herself to refer to it as anything other than "it," much less a human being. She is desperate to get rid of this unwelcome invader, and when she does, she feels tremendous relief. Both of these reactions to a fetus, and all reactions in between, are perfectly valid and natural. Both may even occur in the same woman, years apart.

However, anti-choicers insist not only that a fetus is a human being, but that this status is an objective scientific fact. Unfortunately, they are assuming the very thing that requires proving, thereby committing the logical fallacy of "begging the question." Biology, medicine, law, philosophy, and theology have no consensus on the issue, and neither does society as a whole. There will never be a consensus because of the subjective and unscientific nature of the claim, so we must give the benefit of the doubt to women, who are indisputable human beings with rights.

Anti-choicers must claim that fetuses are human beings, of course, or they really have no case against abortion. Since this claim is the cornerstone of their position, it should be critiqued in detail, from philosophical, legal, social, and biological perspectives<2>. Even though it has little relevance for the actual practice of abortion, the assertion that fetuses are human beings has a potentially great impact on the rights of women.

------------------------------------snip---------------------------------------------

taken from:
http://www.prochoiceactionnetwork-canada.org/articles/fetusperson.shtml

******
sincere apologies again that this article is so dated. Despite the date it was written, I find the information no less relevant. These arguments continue to rage between the anti and pro choice contingents. As such, thought this article would be good to have here. :hi:

[smokey nj]

1. Thanks for posting this, bliss!!

This article contains really great information.

[bliss_eternal]

2. I went on an information binge.

This was one of the articles I found while obsessing over medical professionals that choose to deny women services, (based on the pros personal beliefs). I just don't understand that at all.

Clearly a medical professional is aware of the science of fetal development. So, I wondered if their decision was based on the science or on their religious/spiritual beliefs, or a combination of some sort. More frequently than not, I've seen/heard people sharing that they base their belief that abortion is wrong on what religion has taught them.

I just wanted a better sense of why someone that has knowledge of the science, would be anti-choice. Not sure that my search helped fill in that blank for me. But this article at least confirms what I'd learned previously.

[smokey nj]

3. What motivates a person with anti-choice views to choose gynecology as a specialization in the first

place? I wonder if there's a concerted effort in the forced-birth movement to saturate the field with their minions. Also, I wonder what the gender break down is of anti-choice medical professionals.

[ThomCat]

4. That's very well written.

It's definitely a piece written to bolster arguments and moral on our side. No anti-choice person would read it without having a religious fit of some kind. :)

[ismnotwasm]

5. A great one

That is an excellent, excellent piece. It puts things in great perspective, and I've got it bookmarked. Thank you!:hi: