|
This is another exemplifier of not only attempts to trash women,and women's reproductive rights (same thing in my mind) but ignore as usual, any maternal moral authority. (A new phrase for me)
If we lived in MY perfect world, (I'm not promoting this in our current political climate--it's a complete fantasy, based on an excellent philosophical essay I've read recently and ESPECIALLY not in this case) Women have the absolute and moral right over the life and death of their fetus. Birth is, indeed a gift. In my perfect world, a woman who had planned a child, was aware of and had chosen to carry this fetus to term, would be within her rights as a potential mother, by maternal moral authority to bring charges forth. She, as potential mother, not a father, not law, not the state. The laws protecting her choice would be in place.
On the other hand,as long as bullshit like this goes on, all in the name of some sort of nebulous definition of "life" women will not be allowed control of their own bodies, won't be able to claim physical autonomy much less moral authority.
The only one who can claim what a fetal status is, as a matter of perception, is the one the fetus lives off of. The state needs some sort of definition I suppose, but since we're evidently guided by emotionalist zealots who couldn't give a shit less about what "life" really means, but are, oh, so eager to shove their own limited and distorted definitions into even more limited and distorted law, we end up with ugly situations like this, that not only cause harm, but have the potential to violate human rights.
The essay by the way is Abortion, Killing and Maternal Moral Authority by Soran Reader in the January/March issue of Hypatia
|