All aboard the American express
Ruth Fowler travels coast to coast by rail and discovers that, if you really want to get under the skin of the States, Amtrak is the way to goRuth Fowler The Observer, Sunday June 29, 2008
I'd been seduced by the mythology of the American Road Trip. Hunter S Thompson's Fear & Loathing, Thelma & Louise ... even Ferris Bueller's Day Off had me drooling for the open highway. After living in New York for three years and seeing nothing of the rest of North America, it felt like a rite of passage. The only problem was I hadn't driven in 10 years, and the last time I did I'd managed to cruise into a petrol pump. Then there was the problem of petrol prices reaching $4 a gallon: a cross-country road trip would have cost me around $2,500 in fuel alone. Greyhound, of course, was an option, but I'd done that before. If you ever want to experience pure unmitigated terror, head for a US bus station at midnight. That's all I'll say on the matter.
I decided to go by rail. Every American I spoke to was astounded. 'You're taking the train across America? Isn't that, like, old-fashioned?' They besieged me with horror stories: 'Once I took the train to LA. This lady stalled her car on the tracks. She just sat right on in the car and kept trying to start the engine. Then we came along, ploughed right on over her and the car. She died. We were delayed a whole day.'
My plans may have met with bemusement, but it turns out I was not alone in turning to the train. Passenger numbers on Amtrak, the government-run intercity rail service, have increased by 17 per cent this year alone due to fuel costs pricing out Middle America from driving or flying across the country. Its increased popularity has even led to talk of reinstating routes that fell out of use last century.
I took the plunge and booked a trip from New York to LA, with stops in Chicago, Minneapolis, Whitefish Montana, Portland Oregon and San Francisco.
I rocked up to Penn Station one baking hot day a month back, ready to get on my first train for an 18-hour journey to Chicago. Initial impressions? This ain't British Rail. OK, you're not getting high-speed deluxe journeys à la Eurostar, but huge, spacious coach seats - and for the more discerning, wealthier passenger, cute little first-class private sleeper compartments with fold-out bunks - ensured that this was not like the cramped, uncomfortable journeys I remembered from my youth in England. ......(more)
The complete piece is at:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/travel/2008/jun/29/railtravel.usa