in Venezuela, or the 8 to 1 increase in primary care centers, or the 30% to 40% reduction in food prices for the poor, or the school lunch programs for 1.8 million children by 2006 (compared to 250,000 in 1999), or the 45% increases in secondary and higher education enrollment (from 1999 to 2006), or the near quadrupling of growth in the number of public schools (1999 vs 2005), or the 314% increase in social spending overall (since 1998; now 20% of GDP), or the poverty rate cut in half (as to cash income--plus new access to education, health care, etc.), or about unemployment cut by 1/3 to 1/2, or the increase of 1.8 million jobs in the private sector (since 1999), or that Venezuela's GDP grew nearly 90% between 2003-2007 (vs 30% in the 1970s expansion), nor any of the other in some cases astonishing achievements of the Chavez government,
yet,
we DO hear news about Venezuela, in the corpo-fascist media and from anti-Chavez posters, but virtually only when Venezuela, say, suffers a drought and a drop in hydroelectric power, or any negative story they can come up with from the vigilant monitors of the Chavez government, and when they can't find anything, they just make shit up--like the awesome bullshit about Chavez being "anti-semitic"--or they consult the CIA newswire and reprint shit like Chavez giving $700,000 to a guy named "Guido" in Miami, to carry in a suitcase through airport customs in Argentina (ahem, he got caught), then returning to Miami and somehow hooking up with a Bushwhack U.S. attorney as a "witness" in a case against other businessmen, alleged to have pressured "Guido" in Miami to keep the Chavez connection quiet, and, in doing so, failed to "register as agents of a foreign government" with U.S. Attorney General Alberto 'torture memo' Gonzales.
45% increases in secondary and higher education enrollment (from 1999 to 2006)
increase of 1.8 million jobs in the private sector (since 1999)
GDP grew nearly 90% between 2003-2007 (vs 30% in the 1970s expansion).
But, hey, "Guido" says Chavez is corrupt. And corp-fascist 'news' monopoly editors say Chavez has hurt corpo-fascist "free speech." And DU posters say Chavez is a fool, a clown, an egotistical despot, a fascist (?!), a dictator, and his repeated endorsement by Venezuelan voters in transparent elections is just "buying votes." (Um, if he is a "dictator," why does he have to 'buy' votes and why couldn't he "dictate" more electricity production in Venezuela?)
These are the kind of things we are bombarded with, in the corpo-fascist media and by the corpo-fascist media trumpeters at DU. It just strikes me as curious, after having just reviewed an exhaustive report on Venezuela's economy and Chavez government actions, that people in this country don't know that the Chavez government has overseen a 45% increase in school enrollment in Venezuela. Think of how many young lives are thus being re-directed out of poverty and desperation, and saved by that policy--to become creative, useful, responsible adults, and to help create a better future for Venezuela!
The Chavez government gets no credit for this, no praise, no acknowledgement of what the odds against it were, how the rightwing fought it--and when they were in charge, utterly neglected education for the poor--how the U.S. government fought it and tried to topple Venezuelan democracy. They did this and much more, despite being under siege. The Chavez government gets no breaks at all.
And this is why I am constantly posting the other side--the pro-Chavez side--because our corpo-fascist media and some DU commenters never do. Their view is completely unbalanced. Maybe Chavez
is an egotist and needs to be watched. That's a kind of odd charge to make against a politician. I'm sure that FDR was an egotist. And of course all politicians need to be watched. I watch Chavez, from a distance, through the hostile media and alternative sources. I look for signs that the charges against him are true. I look into it. I read a lot. I review as much factual information as I can find. I check out what other leaders in the region say. I watch vids of Chavez and of Chavez with other leaders and various people. I can't understand the Spanish very well, but I can read faces and body language. This has added to my understanding. And I have not found any substance in most of the charges against Chavez, and where some criticism has a grain of truth, it's usually something that is a quite normal political flaw--typical of any political party in power for ten years--or a typical government failure (given all that government does). Compared to what OUR government has done, and what OUR leaders have done, it is just nothing. Compared to the accomplishments of the Chavez government, the flaws and the mistakes and the inefficiencies fade into insignificance.
45% increases in secondary and higher education enrollment (from 1999 to 2006).
Think about it.
----------------------------
http://www.rethinkvenezuela.com/downloads/cepr%20report.htm