|
But I don't think Santos would jeopardize the U.S. "free trade for the rich" deal, now that it's a slamdunk in the Diebolded Puke Congress. What has all his democracy cosmetics been about, except to get that deal done?
And I don't think anything will jeopardize the war profiteers' backup boondoggle in Colombia and the region--except maybe U.S. bankruptcy. Clinton/Obama seem quite gung-ho to keep that particular bloody filth--the U.S. "war on drugs"--pouring into military 'contractors' pockets.
So I tend to think that you're right about the toss to the courts ploy. It's hard to believe that Makled will actually end up in Venezuela and get properly prosecuted for the murders and other crimes that he has been accused of. Despite Santos' need for trade with Venezuela, I can't believe that Santos would risk the U.S. trade deal--that all and sundry on the wrong side of things have worked so hard to achieve--nor the "war on drugs"/war-on-poor-Colombians gravy train, which Santos personally lobbied the U.S. Senate for. I don't think he's jeopardizing anything for the sake of good relations with Venezuela. It's more likely that he's sucking Venezuela in, with subtler tactics than Uribe was capable of, and "the boot" will come down later. Maybe Chavez's shutdown of the border was stopping some 'dirty tricks' operatives from entering Venezuela? With "free trade" between the countries, Venezuela is much easier to penetrate.
I just don't believe that Santos is an independent actor. I think he is Panetta-chosen. The question is: what is Panetta's game? Part of it is covering up Bush Jr's bloody trail through Colombia, I'm pretty sure of that. But another part may be a more experienced, subtler, more--um--'professional' CIA than the Bushwhacks were running (or that the CIA was capable of running, under the Bush Junta's thuggish rule). Panetta is a Daddy Bush pal--member of his Iraq Study Group and all. So I think we're seeing a resurgence of THAT CIA, whose activities will be harder to recognize and to trace. I don't think there has been any let-up whatsoever in trying to topple Chavez. It's just not quite as obvious as it was. It may be that Panetta has decided to slow the game down. The Bush Junta's brutal tactics were just getting more leftists elected in the region. "Divide and conquer" among the likes of Dilma Rousseff (Lula da Silva's protege), Evo Morales, Rafael Correa, Cristina Fernandez, Jose Mujica, Daniel Ortega, et al, have to be much cleverer. They are simply too savvy, and have too much hard experience behind them, to be easily bullied or fooled. And Honduras has put them all on the alert. What a stupid move! (I'm pretty convinced that it was a Bush Junta plot, sprung six months into the Obama administration, that Clinton couldn't or didn't want to get out of. Still not sure about Obama--maybe too much on his hands, with too little power?)
Anyway, to "turn" Latin America back into the U.S. "back yard" is going to take long, difficult, delicate, stealthy work. The momentum for L/A independence is quite overwhelming. And even some of the rightwing rulers have to be careful about it--and look like they are defending their peoples' sovereign interests. The defections on Cuba, and the defections and potential defections on the "war on drugs," involve political leaders across the spectrum, not just leftists. And the more people benefit from Latin America-only and multi-lateral trade, the stronger does the independence movement become.
This may have something to do with Santos toning things down. He has to appear to be more cooperative to get anywhere with leaders like those mentioned above--some of whom were tortured by U.S.-supported fascists, imprisoned, saw family and friends murdered, saw their countries ravaged by the likes of the fascist elite in Colombia. Also, it would play on their deepest desire--their desire for peace in the region--for Colombia to seem to be on a better path. Whether it is or not remains to be seen. I don't trust Santos one bit, and I don't imagine that they do either. But, as Emily Dickinson wrote,"Hope is a thing with feathers." You just can't help but hope that this big, U.S.-armed client state, right in their midst, can change, can start looking to Colombia's real interests and the region's interests. It is not realistic. It is a hope.
As for Makled, I'm sure there is a script written in Langley. We just can't see what it is, exactly. If he has any Bush Junta drug/death squad connections, he'll likely never go to Venezuela. Panetta wouldn't risk Venezuela's rather formidable intelligence agency, and new cooperation among leftist governments, "turning" him, especially since he's charged with murder and looking at life in prison. He also won't go there if he is a CIA ally/operative, apart from Bush Jr's liability. I think that is probably the most serious danger, from Panetta's point of view--not that he might have knowledge of Jr-authorized crimes, but that he's part of the CIA's own drug operations with the additional value of having been in place to dirty up some Chavez government people or to trump up evidence of it. And if he's under the control of Venezuela's justice system, and under threat of life sentence, he may tell what he really knows, and not what he was told to say if he was caught. All of this points to: The Colombia court will never extradite him to Venezuela (if the judges want to keep living) and Santos was lying through his teeth. There could be something subtler at work. I just don't know what it would be.
I expect next to hear that Makled has escaped from Colombian custody and turned up in Miami, and it'll be months, years, decades before he can be extradited back.
The U.S. government has no money with which to "close" Guantanamo Bay, did you hear? They'll never have the money to extradite Makled back to Colombia or even to arrest him. But maybe they'll put him "under house arrest" at the luxury condo in Miami and give him Secret Service protection. And he can freely spout off to the Miami Hairball trumpeting it all into Venezuela, via the "Voice of (Corporate) America," to prep things for 2012.
|