|
SNIP:
** More disgusting brinksmanship playing with people's lives and in this case family ties *** However this could just be a last gasp by rightie wishful thinkers, so they don't look too pathetic
Diaz-Balart’s wording on Cuba was approved by a voice vote — indicating there was no strong opposition — in the House Appropriations Committee as an amendment to a bill funding the Treasury Department and other agencies for the coming fiscal year.
The bill is all but certain to be approved unchanged by the Republican-controlled House. The Democratic-controlled Senate usually does not draft its own version of the Treasury budget bill, leaving it to a House-Senate conference committee, with members appointed by congressional leaders, to craft a compromise.
House and Senate Democrats in the conference committee will try to strip the Diaz-Balart language out of the bill, said the Capitol Hill staffer, “but in a conference committee the leadership gives the orders, and on this one I don’t know if the Democratic leadership is willing to die for travel to Cuba.”
That leadership would include Sen. Bob Menendez, a powerful Cuban-American democrat from New Jersey who has steadily and harshly criticized Obama’s efforts to ease the Cuba travel restrictions. What’s more, Claver-Carone said he has noticed a drop in Capitol Hill enthusiasm for easing regulations on travel to Cuba, amid reports that some Cuban-Americans are travelling to the island repeatedly. “When the same people are going to Cuba two and three times and even more times a year, that starts to take the edge off the humanitarian intent” of easing the travel restrictions, the lobbyist said.
Obama’s veto threat also rings hollow, the Capitol Hill staffer said, because he needs both the funding bill and Menendez’s support in Congress as well as for raising money and campaigning in Florida and New Jersey for the 2012 presidential election.
He also noted the Cuba language was the last of the three sections of the Treasury bill that Obama threatened to veto in the five-page declaration the White House issued last week. The other sections he opposes cover issues with far more resonance across the nation — Wall Street reforms and consumer protection measures. “Would Obama really veto the bill and risk de-funding Treasury?” the staffer added. “This all seems like too much brinksmanship.”
|