Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Evading indigenous consultation in Bolivia

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Places » Latin America Donate to DU
 
Zorro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-11 09:53 PM
Original message
Evading indigenous consultation in Bolivia
Looks like Lula's and Morales' hagiographies could use some updating.

<snip>

Indigenous Bolivians are searching for social justice as the government plans to build a new highway.

Indigenous groups from the lowlands of Bolivia have been marching since August 15, 2011 to protest the construction of a highway through protected territories. Over 1,500 protesters have joined the 375-mile trek from the Amazon lowlands to La Paz, pregnant women and children included. President Evo Morales response was to label them "enemies of the nation." He discredited protesters, portraying them as being confused by NGOs, and even denounced the march as another strategy of US imperialism. Although negotiations are in sight, what seems like a mere controversy over a local issue may in fact be representative of Latin America’s broader tensions with its indigenous population.

Building a highway through the TIPNIS

This is the latest in series of indigenous protests against megaprojects developed on indigenous lands without consultation. The TIPNIS - the Isiboro Secure Indigenous Territory and National Park - is both a national park and an autonomous territory held in common by the Yuracare, Moxeno and Chiman peoples. The Bolivian government contends that a highway through the TIPNIS is critical to the economic development of the nation. Indigenous groups oppose its passing through the heart of a conservation area on ancestral lands, and want the highway to be redirected around it.

The 190-mile highway would link the agricultural region of Beni with the commercial crossroads of Cochabamba. In addition to cutting travel time in half, the route strategically short-circuits Santa Cruz, a region that has staunchly opposed Morales' presidency.

Political allegiances play a crucial role, with settlers coming from the highland areas defending the project (through coca grower federations - key political allies of Morales). As settlers outnumber natives three to one, their quest for land has led to a tense cohabitation.

<snip>

More at: http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2011/09/201197105514717750.html
Refresh | +1 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Bacchus39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-11 11:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. interesting stuff
A recent study estimates that 64 per cent of the TIPNIS will be deforested within 18 years. In addition to environmental stress, the road will facilitate land invasion by loggers and cocaleros, accelerating the disappearance of indigenous livelihoods in the area.

---------

Then there is oil. The Morales government has repeatedly suggested that the further expansion of extractive industries and megaprojects is on his political agenda. In July, Bolivia’s Minister of Hydrocarbons and Energy, Jose Luis Gutierrez, announced the possibility of oil exploration in the TIPNIS, where reserves appear to be significant. The controversy goes well beyond the highway: It is about the access the highway provides for exploiting natural resources.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-11 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. 64% deforested? Jesus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Bacchus39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-11 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. it is an opinion piece
however, it provides substantial factual info about this issue in Bolivia including the government's complete indifference to cultural and environmental concerns. environmental destruction is a given with a new highway even without resource extraction plans for the park. I posted a map of the alignment the other day somewhere. the road bisects the park north to south. the map showed the indigenous alternative that completely surrounds the park. it looks quite feasible as it appears to be just below the mountain range. the intersection with the road to the north would have to be further west of the existing proposal but appears completely reasonable.

the resource extraction claims that mining and extraction interests are planned for the park are compelling. selecting the shortest distance for the road certainly doesn't seem the only motive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Dec 22nd 2024, 02:35 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » Latin America Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC