Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Mexico's top Cabinet secretary dies in crash

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Places » Latin America Donate to DU
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-11-11 11:14 PM
Original message
Mexico's top Cabinet secretary dies in crash
Source: AP

Mexico's top Cabinet secretary dies in crash


MEXICO CITY (AP) — The country's top Cabinet secretary, Francisco Blake Mora, a key figure in Mexico's battle with drug cartels, died Friday in a helicopter crash that President Felipe Calderon said was probably an accident.

Blake Mora, 45, was the second interior minister Calderon has lost in an air crash during his administration.

Despite some tendencies to suspect a hit on the top officials leading Calderon's offensive against organized crime, the crash that killed Blake Mora and seven others may have had to do with bad weather. A Learjet that slammed into a Mexico City street in 2008, killing former interior secretary Juan Camilo Mourino and 15 others, was blamed on pilot error.

One of Blake Mora's last postings on his Twitter account commemorated the loss of Mourino. "Today we remember Juan Camilo Mourino three years after his death, a person who was working to build a better Mexico," he tweeted on Nov. 4.



Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/mexicos-top-cabinet-secretary-dies-crash-194211677.html



Face of Mexico's drug war dies in chopper crash


We, too, can be Mexico unless we stop this fake and corrupt Drug War -- !!


Refresh | +5 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-12-11 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. "...leading Calderon's offensive against organized crime." ??
My theory on Colombia is that the Bush Cartel used the U.S. "war on drugs" to consolidate the trillion+ dollar cocaine trade into fewer hands and to control this huge revenue stream through the favored big drug networks. Alvaro Uribe was the 'mafia' don whom the Bushwhacks put in place as president of Colombia to get this done. Note: The militarists have been "fighting the drug trade" for decades, in recent years with massive funds and military assistance from U.S. taxpayers, and the cocaine just keeps on flowing out of Colombia.

There are some other purposes of the U.S. "war on drugs" in Colombia, one of them being to prep the country for U.S. "free trade for the rich." Uribe's military and his paramilitary death squads targeted trade union leaders and other leaders and advocates of the poor. Uribe used the country's spy agency, DAS, directly aided and abetted by the U.S. embassy, to spy on threats to "free trade for the rich" and draw up hit lists for the death squads. The U.S. military was active in this carnage, with drone bombings, "training" and "advising" the Colombian military, on the ground presence at many military bases and very possibly direct participation in some of the massacres. FIVE MILLION peasant farmers were driven from their lands by state terror and thousands of poor people, especially labor and community leaders, have been murdered.

Something similar may be going on in Mexico. This was a Bush Junta pet project--to infuse billions of our tax dollars into creating murder and mayhem in Mexico via the U.S. "war on drugs." It was one of their final and most awful acts with regard to Latin America (but do notice how the Democratic Party leadership bends over for this kind of corruption). Part of the reason they targeted Mexico is that their operative, Calderon, has not been able to achieve his main mission--to privatize Mexico's oil. There is too much of a leftist majority in Mexico which adamantly opposes privatization. Thus, the Bush Junta strategy was to create conditions that favor militarists and rightwingers, to foster a climate of repression and fear and to prevent a leftist government from being elected and making oil privatization and other lootings of the Mexican people all the more difficult.

The "war on drugs" is also a means of taking away Mexicans' civil rights, as they have done with the Patriot Act and the militarization of our police forces here. When "the feds" can spy on you, can kick in your door and arrest you and seize your property and even shoot you, on suspicion of drug trafficking, they can do anything, really. The Corporate Rulers now have many tools with which to shut us up--the "war on drugs," the "war on terror," the militarization of the police, the denial of the right to assemble, the denial of the right to petition our government, denial of the right to even speak to our government leaders--with layers and layers of buffer between us and them--and so on. (--not to mention corporate control of the 'TRADE SECRET' voting systems all over the U.S., with evidence that Calderon was installed by electronic election fraudulence at the top of their system--i.e., Mexicans vote on paper but the tallies are now done in secret by corporate powers; Calderon 'won' by only 0.05% against an FDR-style leftist).

A third reason for this giveaway of billions of our tax dollars to U.S. and Mexican military contractors was/is sheer war profiteering.

As for the drug trade, I believe they are trying to eliminate the small or uncooperative drug networks, in favor of a consolidation of the drug traffic and its huge revenues, as in Colombia. This fosters two kinds of mayhem--favored vs disfavored drug gangs at war with each other, and the "state" at war with the smaller, or independent, or non-cooperating drug networks.

Some of the above may be why most Mexicans believe that this Interior Secretary and the last one were assassinated. (Both died in air crashes.) The Interior Secretary runs the "war on drugs." One possibility is that they were assassinated by either disfavored drug lords (the ones who wouldn't "play ball") or by the Bush Cartel/CIA for some violation of the secret pacts that are involved. Another possibility: one or both were trying to set up their own 'mafia' (such as Uribe had in Colombia)--as opposed to the Bush Cartel/CIA operation. It is also possible that one or both were good guys, who were, say, going after favored and disfavored drug bosses even-handedly, or, say, were trying to protect Mexico's sovereignty or Mexicans' civil rights (weren't doing 'their job' re the billions of U.S. tax dollars shoved in their direction).

I think that the U.S. "war on drugs" is totally, totally, TOTALLY corrupt. It's "Alice in Wonderland"--everything is upside down, inside out and backwards. There is nothing good about it. NOTHING!

After having followed the news out of Colombia over the last decade (and having "read between the lines" quite a lot), it seems very clear to me that the U.S. has been engaged in yet another evil, dishonest, unjust, horrendous war and the most amazing thing about it is that NOBODY HERE KNOWS THAT WE HAVE BEEN AT WAR IN COLOMBIA.

My conclusion about Mexico is that now we are engaged in a similar evil, dishonest, unjust, horrendous war in Mexico as well. The U.S. "war on drugs" is not a war for anything good. It is the opposite. It is a war for evil purposes, conducted by evil men, with the war profiteers and the corporate resource thieves are the main beneficiaries.

One final thought about this Interior Secretary "...leading Calderon's offensive against organized crime." Our capitalistic system has become "organized crime." That is the bigger picture. The illegal drug trade is just one aspect of this overall criminal organization that is running everything. And one of the purposes of gaining control of the trillion+ dollar illicit drug revenues is to PROP UP this system--for instance, by running this massive revenue stream through the banksters' pockets. We shouldn't wonder why this INSANE policy--the "war on drugs"--is continuing. Common sense and good government policy are NOT relevant to the discussion because of WHO is profiting.

I don't know the solution to this horrendous corruption--although I do believe that I know where the solution begins: by throwing the corporate-run electronic voting machines into 'Boston Harbor' where they belong. That is the beginning of all solutions.

OF COURSE drugs should be legalized--and the justice system completely removed from the drug "problem." But this is NEVER going to happen--common sense is NEVER going to be employed--until we get back control of our democracy. And the first step to doing that is to get our vote counting back into the PUBLIC venue, so that we can start electing non-corrupt leaders who actually represent the interests of the people of this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
roody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-12-11 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. kick for your commentary
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
arikara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-12-11 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. The war on drugs
= the war on terror.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 02:26 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Yup, the Bushwhacks welded them together, with the collusion of
our entire political establishment. Thus, some 70% of the people in our vastly overstuffed prison system are there, for long periods of time--in wretched conditions and often in slave-like servitude--for non-violent offenses, most of it drug possession and trafficking. It is, for one thing, a way to remove black male voters from the voting rolls and from their communities. (They are counted as warm bodies in white rural districts, where prisons are located, to get extra federal funding out of proportion to the population numbers--though these "warm bodies" can't vote and don't belong to those communities.)

In short, it is a means of oppressing the poor--and also of recruiting cannon fodder for corporate resource wars.

Oh, the "war on drugs" comes in handy for many corporate/war profiteer purposes--as does the "war on terror." And it is SO-O-O-O convenient just to smoosh them together, as the Bushwhacks did in Colombia, and, as their parting shot, in Mexico. We should never forget that it was Bill Clinton who started "Plan Colombia" but it took very special perversity to turn that into a mafia operation of benefit to the banksters, among others! The FARC guerrillas--who have been waging armed conflict against Colombia's fascist rulers for more than fifty years-- thus became equivalent to Al Qaeda, and every trade union leader and community activist in Colombia thus ALSO got categorized as a "terrorist"--and was so characterized, openly, by Colombia's gangster 'president,' Alvaro Uribe.

Just smoosh it all together: Anyone who dares to threaten Corporate/War Profiteer Rule--whether with their vote, or their speech, or their organizing, or their alternative economy, or--if they are pushed beyond endurance--with armed resistance--becomes a perpetrator of 9/11 and worthy of execution without trial, draconian imprisonment, confiscation of their property, ruination of their lives. Al Qaeda jihadist or a teacher in a rural school in Colombia, or a desperate, unemployed kid in a ghetto with drugs in his pocket, or a medical marijuana provider, or a coal miners' union organizer, or, really, anybody--ANYBODY can be made into a criminal, if they pose a threat of any kind to the rich and the powerful.

That's what the Bushwhacks did, when they wrote "the war on terror" into "Plan Colombia."
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Dec 22nd 2024, 01:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » Latin America Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC