Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama. Inc. Worth Waiting For

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
impik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-21-09 10:36 AM
Original message
Obama. Inc. Worth Waiting For
Backing the Biggest Venture Capitalist in the World: Obama, Inc.

By John F. Wasik,
Author of the Audacity of Help: Obama’s Economic Plan and the Remaking of America (Bloomberg Press).



Quick quiz. Name the biggest venture capitalist in the world. Silicon Valley moguls John Doerr or Vinod Khosla? Maybe Microsoft billionaires Bill Gates and Paul Allen? How about Apple’s Steve Jobs?

All wrong. The two biggest venture capitalists bar none are President Barack Obama and Energy Secretary Steven Chu. As the executives of Obama, Inc., they will be responsible for pouring more money into promising new ventures than probably all of Silicon Valley combined.

The money that Obama, Inc., will be investing to create private jobs – mostly through the economic stimulus plan passed in February – so dwarfs what any other firm is doing that it has the power to transform the U.S. and world economy. As most of the nation frets over growing unemployment, economic stagnation and fear of an even deeper recession, Obama, Inc. is making a profound investment for the future. In researching my book The Audacity of Help: Obama's Economic Plan and the Remaking of America ( www.audacityofhelp.net), I discovered that the jobs Obama, Inc. will create will take years to materialize and re-position the country as the world's leading energy and biomedical researcher.

I don’t want to sound too much like a cheerleader since a lot of venture capital doesn’t really produce jobs or profits, at least not in the short term. It is money allocated to fund the dreams and ideas of those employing it. Most firms fail to do what they set out to do. Even more burn up their capital without creating a profitable product.

The sheer mountain of money being devoted to energy research and conservation is staggering. The stimulus plan set aside nearly $37 billion for the Department of Energy alone. While that doesn’t sound like much in a $13 trillion economy, consider this: Khosla Ventures, the largest venture capital enterprise in Silicon Valley to date, said it has raised $1.1 billion in two funds. And that was the largest amount raised by a venture capital firm since 2007, according to The New York Times.

Where is the energy department’s money going? The largest chunk – about $17 billion – is being invested in energy efficiency and renewable energy. The National Renewable Energy Lab in Golden, Colorado, will see the lion’s share of these funds for everything from more efficient solar cells to energy from biomass (organic waste). Obama, Inc. is also serious about creating an entire industry around "plug-in’’ electric vehicles that could be recharged off the grid. It’s ponied up $27 billion for battery and vehicle research and development. Given Detroit’s sad state of affairs of late, that makes Obama, Inc. the largest single investor in the auto industry – and that’s in addition to their bailout of GM and Chrysler.

Even when you consider the entire private VC industry, the Obama, Inc. numbers still loom large. About $7 billion was invested by private firms during the first half of the year, reports the trade group National Venture Capital Association. It’s estimated that for the entire year, up to $14 billion will be invested. So the government is pledging more than twice the private funding – and that’s just on energy projects.
If you’re a biomedical company or researcher, the government spigot is once again gushing money. The stimulus act set aside some $49 billion for health technology, some of which will go into digitizing medical records and do efficacy research. About $10 billion was tabbed for medical research and facilities. As with the Department of Energy, the National Institutes of Health has no peer when it comes to medical research – it’s the world’s largest. And there’s more to come as the Obama Administration has made record digitization and medical research one of its budget priorities. The stimulus funds will be doled out over the next two years.

While the Obama Administration’s commitment to energy and medical research has no precedent, there’s always the bugaboo of getting government involved in anything. There’s a huge bureaucracy behind awarding grants and a not trifling amount of it may wind up with corrupt contractors or favor-seeking political bosses. The administration has pledged transparency and accountability on this account, although this will be hard to track because so much money is being given out so quickly – and the money needs to produce jobs to boot.

What’s certain is that if this massive spending produces a breakthrough in any area from advanced batteries to cancer research, the effects will be profound and long lasting. It will create new millionaires or billionaires, reshape the energy economy and possibly produce the kind of technology the country desperately needs to diminish climate change effects and job loss.

Yet nothing will be achieved if Washington changes course and decides long-term research isn’t yielding results or jobs fast enough. Only a sustained effort and continuous funding over several years will seed progress. Unlike private VC executives, Obama, Inc. (along with Congress and an anxious electorate for that matter) needs to think long-term – for the next generation. While patience is in short supply these days, we need to tap much more of it to ensure the survival of Obama's progressive agenda. That's an investment that will pay off.


www.audacityofhelp.net

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2009/11/21/806675/-Obama.-Inc.-Worth-Waiting-For


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tyne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-21-09 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
1. Exactly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-21-09 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
2. It's about time that we apply the same efforts to peaceful ends that R&D at the DOD has had.
:applause:

We got the Internet from DARPA and lots of goodies from NASA.

:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-21-09 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. LALALA
I can't hear you. I think my XM radio is up too loud.

:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-21-09 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. I spewed...
...my coffee...

curses, prodn2000!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-21-09 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. I do what I can
Good Morning!

:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coyote_Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-21-09 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
3. Still
nothing for Main Street Amerikkka small business creation and development.

This economy isn't going to be fixed and enough new jobs are not going to be created by encouraging one small sector of one emerging industry. That is the kind of policy that will have long-term results. But the people who are unempoyed need jobs NOW. Too bad the President isn't willing to pony up some substantial $$$ for small business creation and development across the country and across multiple industries. He was certainly willing to throw $$$$$ at the Wall Street boys.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-21-09 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Actually they did a 15 billion loan guarantee for small businesses
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coyote_Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-21-09 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. And
how many billions did they throw at the big corporations?

Most of those jobs that have been lost are not coming back. Those folks who need jobs are going to have to create their own. But we sure as hell aren't going to go out of our way to help them much - if at all. But we'll sure help the big Wall Street boys with their campaign finance contributions.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlancheSplanchnik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-21-09 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #3
12. wait a sec,
wasn't that bu$h who threw a no strings attached bailout to Wall Street?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boomerbust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-21-09 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
8. And one way for everybody to have capitalized
Long term would have been to bet on Ford when their stock price was beat down to $1.01 a share. Might still be a good buy at $8.60 a share long term.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-21-09 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Sounds to me like Grovelbot should have a word with you
I mean, philanthropy equals credibility. Starless and speaking of big gains? Tisk tisk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boomerbust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-21-09 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Big gains?
I wish I had 10 bucks to donate to get my star back. tsk tsk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlancheSplanchnik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-21-09 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
13. K n R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kdillard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-21-09 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
14. People have a problem with long term investments. The mainstream
media will not report this and people are too busy trying to undermine Obama which is unfortunate because if the Republicans get back into poewer you can bet they will make no such investments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-21-09 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
15. K&R~Audacity Of Help!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-21-09 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
16. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-21-09 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
17. Thanks, good read. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rollingrock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-21-09 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
18. Not so impressed
37B is a fraction compared to what China is spending on green technology
and is a pittance compared to the 700B Wall Street got in 2008-2009 alone.





The New Arms Race
Posted: November 19, 2009 03:11 PM

...Indeed, the Chinese are treating the energy technology competition if it were an arms race. China is spending as much or more on greentech as it does on its military, hundreds of billions of dollars annually on renewable energy and grid infrastructure improvements. Those investments, if not vigorously countered, will effectively erode America's greentech industry leadership and secure China's dominance. China's economic stimulus package, targeted 38% of spending on greentech, as compared to a miserly 12% of the U.S. stimulus program. By 2013, greentech will account for 15 percent of the Chinese GDP. While the United States is projected to roughly triple its wind generation by 2020, China will increase its capacity twelvefold to a wind generating capability more than twice that of America's. And, while the United States is projected to increase its installed solar generation a modest 33% by 2020, China's solar generation is projected to increase 20,000%.

www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-f-kennedy-jr/the-new-arms-race_b_364211.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-21-09 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. 1,330,044,544 Chinese vs. 307,988,794 Americans....now that's a fraction!
That's a Billion people difference!

Perhaps those who don't bother to compare what is realistic should move to China!

Another comparison:
What's the difference between what an American democratically ruled country is willing to spend, and what a communist Authoritarian government would spend on anything?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rollingrock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-21-09 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. China's huge population
is offset by the fact that 3/4 of their population are subsistence farmers, who contribute little to the greenhouse gas problem, for example. as opposed to the US, where 90% of the population are urban dwellers and heavy consumers of polluting modern technology. even the industial farming methods we use in the US are highly polluting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 07:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC