|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
AllentownJake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 10:56 PM Original message |
On the 45% not turning out in 2010 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
closeupready (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 11:01 PM Response to Original message |
1. ok |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rwheeler31 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 11:02 PM Response to Original message |
2. This polling is so unreliable at this time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AllentownJake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 11:03 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. 55% voter turnout from registered democrats |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughMoran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 11:05 PM Response to Original message |
4. So those numbers are WRT voting age population? Registered turnout was closer to 60% in last off-yea |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AllentownJake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 11:08 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. 60% in the last off year? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughMoran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 11:11 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. I dunno - just did some division from your link |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AllentownJake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 11:12 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. MSNBC puts at 40% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughMoran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 11:14 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. Using WHICH group? total voting age or registered voters? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AllentownJake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 11:24 PM Response to Reply #10 |
16. These numbers are fucking squishy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beyurslf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 11:17 PM Response to Reply #6 |
13. You are talking about people of voting age. The 60% is of "eligible voters" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AllentownJake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 11:30 PM Response to Reply #13 |
20. MSNBC puts 40% of eligible voters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pirate Smile (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 11:07 PM Response to Original message |
5. '94 came as a surprise to Dems near the end of the campaign. This fight is not a surprise and Dems |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AllentownJake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 11:10 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. It's going to be a bad year for democrats |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pirate Smile (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 11:24 PM Response to Reply #7 |
15. Geez, right after I posted I looked at Huffington Post and see that Republicans are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zynx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 11:15 PM Response to Original message |
11. I would also say that these numbers this far out are very squishy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AllentownJake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 11:18 PM Response to Reply #11 |
14. They got some problems after Health Care reform |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zynx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 11:27 PM Response to Reply #14 |
17. Blue Dogs would have been better off if they had backed a much more aggressive bill. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluestateguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 11:15 PM Response to Original message |
12. By October, I predict the two parties numbers will be matched |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zynx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 11:28 PM Response to Reply #12 |
18. Sure, but our present majorities are huge. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AllentownJake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 11:28 PM Response to Reply #12 |
19. Blue Dogs will lose seats |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-05-10 12:29 AM Response to Reply #19 |
22. Since they had the smallest swings- they had the most to gain- or lose with populist reforms |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
napi21 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-04-10 11:37 PM Response to Original message |
21. I don't know %'s but I do know when some groups are MAD and others are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Dec 26th 2024, 01:16 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC