Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

On the 45% not turning out in 2010

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 10:56 PM
Original message
On the 45% not turning out in 2010
As someone who actually works campaigns and has gotten a consulting fee or two for advice on ground game. Not a big deal.

http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0781453.html

If I can get 55% of my democrats to turn out in my democrat leaning districts or even districts in 2010. I'm fucking thrilled.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
closeupready Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. ok
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rwheeler31 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. This polling is so unreliable at this time.
Things will change they always do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. 55% voter turnout from registered democrats
fucking rocks in an off year. Let me know when this drops below 50%, and what the independent numbers look like.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 11:05 PM
Response to Original message
4. So those numbers are WRT voting age population? Registered turnout was closer to 60% in last off-yea
Edited on Mon Jan-04-10 11:06 PM by HughMoran
election. Edit - so 55% of registered - that would be OK I guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. 60% in the last off year?
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15621554/

Where the hell did you get that. Your lucky to break 60% in a Presidential year. Most people don't even know they are registered due to motor voter registration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. I dunno - just did some division from your link
2006 220,600,000 total voting age 135,889,600 registered 80,588,000 turnout 37.1%

80,588,000/135,889,600 = 59.3%
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. MSNBC puts at 40%
and 43% in Virginia and Ohio with competitive races.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 11:14 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Using WHICH group? total voting age or registered voters?
...and why supply a link that doesn't agree with the numbers you're quoting? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. These numbers are fucking squishy
Edited on Mon Jan-04-10 11:26 PM by AllentownJake
You get different numbers per source. The US Census office says 48%

In PA I can give you an exact number, in Oregon I can't. Because in PA you have to be registered 30 days before an election, in Oregon you can show up the day of an election.

The local elections here are high turnout if they crack 20% of eligible voters.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beyurslf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. You are talking about people of voting age. The 60% is of "eligible voters"
which means people registered to vote on election day. There is a good 25-30% of people who are never registered to vote at all. They are not eligible voters come voting time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #13
20. MSNBC puts 40% of eligible voters
The difference isn't that big. Also you have to keep in mind same day voter registration states vs states with deadlines.

We need national uniform election rules.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
5. '94 came as a surprise to Dems near the end of the campaign. This fight is not a surprise and Dems
have plenty of ammunition to use against Republicans.

I also remember how the furor over possible immigration reform had everybody freaked out in 2006. Remember the protests and then protests against the protests? 2006 didn't exactly go the way Dobbs or Buchanan would have thought.

I'm curious what all Obama and the Democrats in Congress have in store to engage the base. They know they need to and I have no doubt they will do it. I'm sure DADT will be coming up soon now that HCR is almost over. Financial Reform is going to be big. Are the Republicans going to end up crying for the poor corporations? I'm thinking they will.

We aren't going to just be sitting back and taking crap from teabaggers and the crazy Republicans.

The White House has already said they are going to be nationalizing the elections, not try to act like it is all about "local" issues.

This is going to be an interesting year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. It's going to be a bad year for democrats
Best bet is to do some moderate base pleasing things for unions and other groups to go back to their membership with.

Lots of bone throwing will be done in April and May particularly after the Health Care fiasco.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. Geez, right after I posted I looked at Huffington Post and see that Republicans are
against creating a Consumer Protection Agency. "Republican Senator Robert Bennett: 'A Single Agency Whose Sole Purpose Is Consumer Protection Would Be Really Bad News' "
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 11:15 PM
Response to Original message
11. I would also say that these numbers this far out are very squishy.
A lot can happen in 11 months. That's not to say we shouldn't start raising money like a son of a bitch and the party needs to better articulate exactly what they intend to do if their majorities are maintained.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 11:18 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. They got some problems after Health Care reform
I don't expect there to be problems in core democratic districts. You'll have a problem for democrats that weakened the legislation with lower democratic turnout and higher GOP turnout. Blue Dogs shoot themselves in the fucking foot every time. You are going to be stuck with whatever the party votes for, you better sell it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. Blue Dogs would have been better off if they had backed a much more aggressive bill.
It would have been easier to sell, not to mention it would have been a better bill. Now they are stuck with a nuanced bill that they only lukewarmly supported.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 11:15 PM
Response to Original message
12. By October, I predict the two parties numbers will be matched
as it pertains to the question about turnout.

We will still lose seats, however.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. Sure, but our present majorities are huge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #12
19. Blue Dogs will lose seats
lower turnout amongst the base, higher turn out amongst the opponent. We'll lose people who are being a pain in the ass right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-05-10 12:29 AM
Response to Reply #19
22. Since they had the smallest swings- they had the most to gain- or lose with populist reforms
Edited on Tue Jan-05-10 12:35 AM by depakid
By opposing them- they've not only hurt the party, their own districts and the nation- but they've as good as lost their own seats!

Hope they have some cozy revolving door jobs lined up- like Billy Tauzin got with PhARMA the last go round.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-04-10 11:37 PM
Response to Original message
21. I don't know %'s but I do know when some groups are MAD and others are
just complaicent. I see Dems & many Indipendents being complaicent right not.

I'm 66 yo now, and I've never missed voting in any election in my life, no matter how small or seemingly indignificant. The smallest I've ever voted in was one special election that involved 110 families!

I believe you have no right to bitch is you didn't vote your opinion in an election!

Too bad so many in off year elections don't feel that way. Way too many people simply aren't interested enough unless they're voting for a PREZ and can't get off their ass for 30 minutes to vote!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC