Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Can someone name an Administration that has been more transparent than this one?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-09-10 10:38 PM
Original message
Can someone name an Administration that has been more transparent than this one?
Please do. I'm all ears.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-09-10 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. I think the word you were searching for was opaque, and not transparent
You are welcome.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-09-10 11:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
14. So, that would be a no, you cannot name one?
You think this administration is more opaque than *'s?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-10-10 05:23 AM
Response to Reply #14
25. Jimmy Carter was far more open than the liars that succeeded him
This Administration is only transparent in its broken promises and deceitfulness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 12:08 AM
Response to Reply #25
29. Carter didn't have internet sites, because they didn't exist at current scale.
..so it's not really fair to note that Obama's team has been blogging, building sites about projects, tweeeting, etc. other than to wonder if Carter *would* have done the same. Same with C-SPAN,

What did Carter do, that Obama hasn't done, that was more open?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-09-10 10:41 PM
Response to Original message
2. President Al Gore's
so transparent, that it was almost invisible.

after all, he did win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CakeGrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-09-10 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
3. Unrecs, but no answers. Interesting. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
last1standing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-09-10 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Yeah, because only one side does that, right?
Bias showing much?

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CakeGrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-09-10 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. You mean compared to your subsequent response to the OP?
:eyes: No bias there!

I do think it's interesting that at the time I posted, the thread was <0 when no one had offered an answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
last1standing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-09-10 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. I provided a real response with a more transparent administration.
You provided nothing but snark about unrecs. Nothing wrong with bias, just bias against people instead of policies. Learn the difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CakeGrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-09-10 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Whatevs.
Now you're just lapsing into lecturing and condescension. Oooh, "learn the difference". Big burn!

I get that a lot of you are pissed off, but insulting me and whomever else crosses your path around here isn't going to solve anything.

And if you think my initial comment was loaded with snark, you're quite ironic. Not to mention pretty darned sensitive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
last1standing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-09-10 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Awww! Did pointing out that you made a personal attack hurt your feelings?
I know you guys have such a "personal bond" with Obama that you think he's family but he really isn't. He's a public official and is therefore fair game for criticism. The posters at DU aren't. You attacked posters, I attacked a public official's record.

Once again, learn the difference.

Or just say "Whatevs" like a petulant teenager. Your choice.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CakeGrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-10-10 12:10 AM
Response to Reply #13
19. Sorry, I won't fall for your fight bait, as hard as you try
And am not going to respond to the tired goading about "you guys" and "personal bonds with Obama". Wouldn't that be an attack on posters by making fun of those who aren't as angry with Obama as you? Hypocrite much?

You need to learn the difference before you overextend yourself to go on the attack. I'm outtie, duuuuude! :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
last1standing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-10-10 12:25 AM
Response to Reply #19
21. I'm just throwing back your attack. Strange you didn't notice that.
But I'm guessing you're not very perceptive. :shrug:

By the way, I also notice that no one is able to refute my statement that Carter's administration was more transparent than Obama's. Too bad all you could contribute to this thread was snark and personal insults. That kind of makes you look silly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
last1standing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-09-10 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
4. Jimmy Carter's.
But then he had far less to hide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-10-10 12:48 AM
Response to Reply #4
22. It would not surprise me. Times were different back then, I guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-09-10 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
6. Why Bush's, clearly, doncha know n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Truth2Tell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-09-10 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
8. Well, I guess that's good enough then.
As long Obama is even a teeny bit better than than what we had before, that's good enough for me. Why raise the bar to some kind of real standard? "Better than X" is enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-09-10 11:41 PM
Response to Reply #8
17. Better than *everything* that came before?
You would dismiss that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-09-10 11:12 PM
Response to Original message
10. we can't tell until someone tries investigating something
maybe we'll get an idea of Obama's transparency if Congress decides to look into AIG, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-09-10 11:40 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. Here ya go:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-09-10 11:17 PM
Response to Original message
11. Is this Rahmbo? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-09-10 11:40 PM
Response to Original message
16. Any President Before Dim Son
What, specifically, has Rahmbama been unusually transparent about?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-09-10 11:43 PM
Response to Original message
18. The William Henry Harrison Administration was pretty transparent
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-10-10 12:11 AM
Response to Original message
20. Can you name an administration that made transparency a top priority?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-10-10 02:22 AM
Response to Original message
23. Can someone name an Administration that has been more mauve than this one?
An equally meaningful question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-10-10 02:56 AM
Response to Original message
24. I wish it was secret as The Colonel's recipe if it was less concerned about blowing "stakeholders",
Edited on Sun Jan-10-10 02:57 AM by TheKentuckian
being corporate friendly, fighting "The War on Terror" by going to random places and creating insurgencies (aka know as motherfuckers who weren't thinking shit about you till you popped in to occupy their country and know they want to give you the ole bum's rush) to kill our troops for no real reason, and didn't maintain an unconstitutional army of the Executive.

More secrets and less kinder, gentler, hipper Poppy would be fine with me.

Sorry to be snarky, it's a good thing and definitely part of what I was voting for but I'd assume be more disappointed here and happier about getting a leash on the corporate communist coming for our last nickles so they can gamble them and win big or make us pay the bookie if things don't work out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 12:11 AM
Response to Reply #24
30. I'm sorry, but I didn't understand this:
"Sorry to be snarky, it's a good thing and definitely part of what I was voting for but I'd assume be more disappointed here and happier about getting a leash on the corporate communist coming for our last nickles so they can gamble them and win big or make us pay the bookie if things don't work out."

What's a "corporate communist"?

Could you perhaps re-phrase that sentence?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
last1standing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-10-10 05:25 AM
Response to Original message
26. Talk about a hit and run thread...
If you're "all ears" why haven't you responded to a single comment? Easy answer, you never had any intention of doing so.

Flamebait from a flamebait artist.

FAIL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ima_sinnic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-10-10 05:40 AM
Response to Original message
27. another transparently idiotic OP bites the unrec bullet
Edited on Sun Jan-10-10 05:40 AM by ima_sinnic
are you a teaching asst in American Govt 101 testing one of your quiz questions or something?

or maybe some astroturfer testing talking points? FYI, this one isn't going over too well. better get with that ad agency to come up with some new meaningless slogans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SergeStorms Donating Member (248 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-10-10 06:26 AM
Response to Original message
28. It's a little hard to judge.......
seeing that President Obama has only served one year of his term. We don't have the luxury of comparing his entire first term to anyone yet.

So far? :shrug: I haven't been too impressed. I expected much more considering the campaign rhetoric that was bandied about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
golfguru Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 12:13 AM
Response to Original message
31. JFK n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC