|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
bluestateguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-09-10 10:38 PM Original message |
Can someone name an Administration that has been more transparent than this one? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-09-10 10:39 PM Response to Original message |
1. I think the word you were searching for was opaque, and not transparent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boppers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-09-10 11:38 PM Response to Reply #1 |
14. So, that would be a no, you cannot name one? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-10-10 05:23 AM Response to Reply #14 |
25. Jimmy Carter was far more open than the liars that succeeded him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boppers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-11-10 12:08 AM Response to Reply #25 |
29. Carter didn't have internet sites, because they didn't exist at current scale. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChairmanAgnostic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-09-10 10:41 PM Response to Original message |
2. President Al Gore's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CakeGrrl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-09-10 10:45 PM Response to Original message |
3. Unrecs, but no answers. Interesting. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
last1standing (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-09-10 10:48 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. Yeah, because only one side does that, right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CakeGrrl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-09-10 11:01 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. You mean compared to your subsequent response to the OP? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
last1standing (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-09-10 11:08 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. I provided a real response with a more transparent administration. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CakeGrrl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-09-10 11:20 PM Response to Reply #9 |
12. Whatevs. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
last1standing (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-09-10 11:31 PM Response to Reply #12 |
13. Awww! Did pointing out that you made a personal attack hurt your feelings? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CakeGrrl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-10-10 12:10 AM Response to Reply #13 |
19. Sorry, I won't fall for your fight bait, as hard as you try |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
last1standing (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-10-10 12:25 AM Response to Reply #19 |
21. I'm just throwing back your attack. Strange you didn't notice that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
last1standing (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-09-10 10:47 PM Response to Original message |
4. Jimmy Carter's. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenPartyVoter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-10-10 12:48 AM Response to Reply #4 |
22. It would not surprise me. Times were different back then, I guess. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-09-10 11:01 PM Response to Original message |
6. Why Bush's, clearly, doncha know n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Truth2Tell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-09-10 11:07 PM Response to Original message |
8. Well, I guess that's good enough then. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boppers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-09-10 11:41 PM Response to Reply #8 |
17. Better than *everything* that came before? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enrique (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-09-10 11:12 PM Response to Original message |
10. we can't tell until someone tries investigating something |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boppers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-09-10 11:40 PM Response to Reply #10 |
15. Here ya go: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rhett o rick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-09-10 11:17 PM Response to Original message |
11. Is this Rahmbo? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MannyGoldstein (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-09-10 11:40 PM Response to Original message |
16. Any President Before Dim Son |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hippo_Tron (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-09-10 11:43 PM Response to Original message |
18. The William Henry Harrison Administration was pretty transparent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dkf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-10-10 12:11 AM Response to Original message |
20. Can you name an administration that made transparency a top priority? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-10-10 02:22 AM Response to Original message |
23. Can someone name an Administration that has been more mauve than this one? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheKentuckian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-10-10 02:56 AM Response to Original message |
24. I wish it was secret as The Colonel's recipe if it was less concerned about blowing "stakeholders", |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boppers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-11-10 12:11 AM Response to Reply #24 |
30. I'm sorry, but I didn't understand this: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
last1standing (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-10-10 05:25 AM Response to Original message |
26. Talk about a hit and run thread... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ima_sinnic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-10-10 05:40 AM Response to Original message |
27. another transparently idiotic OP bites the unrec bullet |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SergeStorms (248 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-10-10 06:26 AM Response to Original message |
28. It's a little hard to judge....... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
golfguru (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-11-10 12:13 AM Response to Original message |
31. JFK n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:12 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC