Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

It's not Harry Reid who should be apologizing

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 06:43 AM
Original message
It's not Harry Reid who should be apologizing
His remarks about Obama, however indelicate, carried an unfortunate truth. The real scandal is comparing him to Trent Lott, as Republican Michael Steele did.

Harry Reid doesn't owe me an apology.

Sure, it was a little odd to see the term "Negro" used outside of a history class or documentary. Sounds like Reid is stuck in the last century.

But the Senate majority leader didn't say anything many Americans -- especially us Negroes -- don't already know.

If you're black, it is easier in this country to be light-skinned.

That's borne out not just by anecdote and experience, but by research documenting favorable treatment for fair-skinned blacks in criminal cases, employment prospects, even social and romantic liaisons.

<snip>

I think the next apology ought to come from Michael Steele -- the light-skinned, dialectically flexible African American head of the Republican National Committee.

Steele has called for Reid to step down as majority leader, likening him to Trent Lott, the former Mississippi senator rebuked in 2002 for saying he was "proud" that his state had supported a segregationist candidate in the 1948 presidential election.

That candidate was Strom Thurmond, who famously declared during his White House campaign: "All the laws of Washington and all the bayonets of the Army cannot force the Negro into our homes, our schools, our churches."

Either Steele is playing politics with a combustible case, or he thinks Americans are so incapable of thinking intelligently about race that we can't tell the difference between Lott and Reid.

http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/newsletter/la-na-reid-banks11-2010jan11,0,3725336.column
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JohnnyLib2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 07:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. Thank you.

That last sentence is extremely thought provoking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
monmouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 08:12 AM
Response to Original message
2. There are times many of us find Harry very, very frustrating but to
think he would purposely say something to hurt or demean someone in a nasty way is laughable. As someone else said, a tin ear with a heart of gold. Harry may not think on his feet as fast as he should but I'll never believe he speaks with malice. I think the President also realizes this and closed the book on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
secondwind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 08:23 AM
Response to Original message
3. I told my husband this morning that Reid was talking TO racism (in Americans)...he wasn't


talking like a RACIST. His comments translated as follows: This guy is perfect. Skin color light, he will be accepted by Americans, and he doesn't have that black "dialect" (that would turn off some folks)....

Just my take on this... I happen to have a light-skinned half-brother, so no offensive replies please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
murray hill farm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 08:53 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Reid was making a comment about
electability in this country and about the racism in this country. It makes the racists in this country so uncomfortable..soooooo uncomfortable to hear this truth that they must scream for his resignation in order to keep their own racists heads from exploding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beartracks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 11:45 PM
Response to Reply #3
15. Agreed. It was a remark borne of observation. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hughee99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
4. Exactly, it's a term that no one even uses anymore...
When Reid was little, sad as it may be, this was the terminology that was acceptable. Can we really get mad at someone for using a term they were taught was acceptable when they were little? Remember how forgiving we all were with George Allen in the "macaca" incident even though most people had never even heard that word before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 08:58 AM
Response to Original message
6. Steele needs to apologize for aligning himself with a party....
.... who hasn't done anything for African Americans since the end of the 19th century. .... a party that STILL hasn't done anything under his leadership.

(And then he needs to apologize to the world for speaking to us as if it were 1991 and he was on the set of "Yo! MTV Raps!")
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brewman_Jax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
7. Hey, Mikey Steele
where's that outrage for your too-often-caught fellow racist repubs, eh? :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
8. Does Michael Steele think Strom Thurmond would want him head of the GOP?
That's the biggest joke of this whole thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
9. That's right..steele sticks his big ol nose
in and comes up looking a racist bigot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeattleGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
10. The right is reacting as if Reid said the "N" word, and not
Negro. The word does sound strange to me, but it's not a racist, hateful word like the other word definitely is.

But then, the right is nothing but hypocritical. Right, Mikey?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generic Brad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
11. Maybe Steele is incapable of thinking intelligently about race
He's incapable of thinking intelligently about anything else. Why should the subject of race be any different with him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
graywarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
12. Steele is so out of touch with reality.
He makes me feel embarrassed watching him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johan helge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
13. K & r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Number23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
14. Michael Steele is "light skinned?"
"I think the next apology ought to come from Michael Steele -- the light-skinned, dialectically flexible African American head of the Republican National Committee."

:wtf:

THIS man??

Aw hell, I'm all confused now...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 06:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC