Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Axelrod Looks Ahead

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 05:06 PM
Original message
Axelrod Looks Ahead
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2010_01/021870.php

AXELROD LOOKS AHEAD.... White House aides have a lot on their plate, but the significance of November's midterm election is not lost on them. Ron Brownstein talked to David Axelrod about his plans and expectations for the next 10 or so months.

Axelrod's checklist includes improvement in the economy, some (but not vastly more) legislative action and, most pointedly, an effort to draw sharper contrasts with Republican positions. His comments may foreshadow a much more pugnacious Democratic message as the election approaches.

"It's almost impossible to win a referendum on yourself," Axelrod insisted. "And the Republicans would like this to be a referendum. It's not going to be a referendum."

Asked what has to happen in the next 10 months to produce the best possible result for Democrats in November, Axelrod didn't hesitate in identifying his top priority: an economy that is adding, rather than losing, jobs each month. "I think job growth is certainly number one," he said. "I think that's how most people measure a recovering economy."

To nudge that process along, he says, he expects Congress to quickly conclude legislation to promote job growth: "We have to take that up right away," he said.


The same checklist features signing a health care reform bill, to which Axelrod added, "Then we have to go out and sell it." He also emphasized Wall Street reform as an area where Dems can get a bill done and score points with voters.

As for throwing a few elbows, Axelrod envisions an electoral landscape that pits Democrats vs. Republicans, as compared to the right vs. Obama.

While Republicans are hoping that voters will view the election as a referendum on Democratic performance, he said Democrats will work to frame the election more as a choice between the parties -- and present an aggressive case against the GOP alternative.

"They want to stand with the insurance industry on health care and protect the status quo, then let them defend that in an election," Axelrod said. "If they want to stand with the banks and the financial industries, and protect the status quo, then let them explain that in an election. If the party that over eight years turned a... surplus into the most significant growth in national debt by far in the history of the country and left this president with a $1.3 trillion deficit when he walked in the door and an economic crisis, let them campaign on fiscal integrity. You know... we're certainly willing to have that discussion. The difference is that we'll have that discussion in the context of a campaign, and we haven't, in the midst of a crisis, tried to campaign every day in the halls of Congress." <...>


Axelrod suggested that another pillar of the Democratic message this year will be that Republicans are offering a return to policies that produced the sharp economic downturn. "I think that the notion of going backward is a compelling message," he said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cant trust em Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. Good point. If 2010 is the year of "look how awful the democrats are"...
then we'll lose big time. Saying that the GOP is the worse alternative, is the option.

Sounds like a bright future. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. Let pukes defend their stagantion party..that's
as dirty as old gutter water.

The Dems have been working to get the bush cheney disaster turned around..whatthefuck have the repubs done?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
3. Do I smell red meat?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seeinfweggos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
4. hell, yes
take the fight right to them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
5. Gonna be a hard sell
Since the Democrats have quite emphatically and publicly stood up for the health insurers (they're not "bad people") PhARMA, and the banksters.

The old saw about "... but we're not Republicans" hasn't sold in the past- and won't likely sell very well this time around either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ibegurpard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
6. I am flabbergasted
Edited on Mon Jan-11-10 10:11 PM by ibegurpard
What kind of doublespeech is this?: "They want to stand with the insurance industry on health care and protect the status quo, then let them defend that in an election"
'cause that's exactly what the Democrats are poised to enact...they're not going to just PROTECT the status quo, they're going to CODIFY it and give the insurance industry more money and customers to boot.
You don't have to SELL real HCR...but you're going to have your work cut out for you with this steaming pile of garbage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 12:20 AM
Response to Original message
7. I'd love to see the democrats put up BIG legislation to help the jobless. We can then see
how the GOP react. That would be boxing them in for once.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadesofgray Donating Member (350 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
8. Yeah, cause the WH isn't standing with the insurance companies and financial industries now.
:sarcasm:

I can't wait to see "that discussion." The dems and the repugs will have to wear labels so I can tell who's who.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC