Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Give me a moment here - why Sarah Palin is a threat, not a joke.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
Capn Sunshine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 05:27 PM
Original message
Give me a moment here - why Sarah Palin is a threat, not a joke.
All through the late sixties and early 70's a governor assumed the mantle of spokesperson for the wingnut faction of the republicans. To everyone else he was a fucking joke. He was noted for his vacuous comments and significant ignorance of facts, particularly in the areas of science and international diplomacy.

That man was Ronald Reagan.

I remember Chevy Chase whenever he needed a cheap laugh on his Update Segment of SNL would refer to the future and "President Ronald Reagan". The idea was so ridiculous that it always evoked gales of laughter.

The notion was absolutely ridiculous. I mean, he once said trees cause pollution fer chrissakes? How stupid did they think the American People were?

The American people demonstrated their capacity for stupidity in 1980 AND 1984. We're still paying for those hugely destructive years. Some parts of our society have changed forever and not for the good. The fucking joke got elected because we didn't take him seriously until it was too late.

Sarah Palin is following a well blazed outsider trail created by the same forces of evil that got Reagan in. Now she's going to be on TV. Your face on the TV screen is all you need to be credible.
PLEASE DO NOT UNDERESTIMATE THE DANGER OF THIS WOMAN.



I would suggest your efforts fighting our president would be better served fighting this evil and looming threat to our country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. It's always a good idea to assume the worse with people like her
best thing we can do is talk up her mental instability.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. I don't think the Reagan/Palin or the GW Bush 2000/Palin comparisons are valid.
Maybe when Palin was first introduced, sure. But Americans have gotten to know Palin at a level that they didn't know Reagan in 1980 or Bush in 2000.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Capn Sunshine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Then you missed my point
for the times, we knew Ronald Reagan VERY WELL. It was just that his viewpoints were considered too wacky to be successful in "mainstream politics"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. I don't think the american voter did know him that well.
I think they may have known his positions on policies, but not how completely fucked in the head he was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. The hoopleheads/bobble heads, what ever, will vote for in droves just because
she is the republican candidate. Socialism is so scary, don't chaknow. Don't write her off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Yeah, they did last time too.
And I think she got a lot more "moderates" last time then she ever will again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CBR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. My fear is that they could become valid if we keep getting the
"There is no difference between Bush, Gore" type lines (i.e. Obama=Bush, Obama=GOP). 2000 was my first presidential election. I was in college and this is all I heard -- Gore is no better etc... and look where it got us. I fear the discourse is going in that direction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #2
25. Ronald Reagan had been a candidate for the Presidency
ever since 1968. I'll admit, he was a "dark horse" then, but he was a very active campaigner in 1976.

The OP is dead right, she's very dangerous. And now she has a platform that will keep her squirting Kool-Aid into the mouths of the reich wing. It all comes down to the economy, if we're out of the toilet by 2012, Obama wins, if not, then whoever the Rethugs nominate wins.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YOY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
4. No...she's pretty much a joke.
Edited on Mon Jan-11-10 05:33 PM by YOY
The real threat comes from Boner and Romney and anyone else who can give a halfway decent speech without splintering their party further.

She's just an easy target and most of the population knows she's a fucking moron. She was the lead weight that sunk the McCain ship and her followers are the lead weight that is sinking the Republican party. If anything she is a diversion...a really hilariously stupid and obviously pathetic one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
5. Her threat doesn't equate to a pass for Obama or anyone else though.
Which your last line seems to imply we should be doing.

And, can you define what you mean by "fighting" the President? I'm "fighting" for equal rights, for example, not "fighting" Obama. If he comes down on the wrong side of that (as he is currently on the GLBT issue) should I not say anything because it'll lead to a Palin presidency?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
10. She is, however, a quitter
and that's a huge problem for any future election she'd like to enter. If being a governor was too much work for her, how could she possibly be a president or vice-president? The kind of people who forgave Reagan his bumbling admired him for being steadfast, not giving up public office halfway through their term to market a book instead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phx_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. LOL. Good point.
Plus, if Levi is correct, and I believe he is on this point. Sarah is very greedy and very lazy. She doesn't like to work -- either at home or work. Being President is non-stop, extremely hard work. Both pysically and mentally demanding for relatively little pay. Now that she has money and national attention, she might not be so hot on the idea of actually working.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phx_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
11. It's not Palin who should be feared or underestimated, it is
the stupidity of the American people, as you stated so well in your post.

And I'm scared of stupid people.

:scared: :scared: :scared: :scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
13. Chevy Chase's quips aside, this analysis is deeply flawed. Reagan had a long involvement in politics
Edited on Mon Jan-11-10 06:06 PM by slackmaster
Before he ran for President. He was well-known to a majority of US voters as far back as the early 1950s. He had name recognition among Californians as far back as 1941 as present of the Screen Actors Guild, not to mention a number of movies he appeared in before that.

Nobody outside of Alaska ever heard of Sarah Palin before late 2007.

His endorsements of Eisenhower and Nixon seemed to fly in the face of his membership in the Democratic party. Reagan's switch to the GOP in 1962 was widely publicized. He was very vocal in his support of Goldwater in 1964 - Even youngsters like me are old enough to remember that.

Before he started getting Alzheimer's, Reagan was quick-witted and well-spoken. Sarah Palin is a ninny, a joke, a nobody.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kdillard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #13
22. I agree with this assessment. I don't see any Reagan in Sarah Palin.
Reagan was likeable and had a certain charm which Sarah Palin lacks. She energies the Democratic base and turns off Independents. Unless that drastically changes I don't see her winning The Republican nomination or Presidency.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #13
26. The comparison isn't exact, I agree.
But Reagan was an actor. Sarah Palin is an actress. That might be the point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CK_John Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
14. Both of these people could size up a crowd in the blink of an eye and adapt to the situation in
another blink. They knew that people don't care if you lie or feed them bs as long as you let them know you know and they are in on the hoax.

You know... wink, wink. Facts are for wimps, science is for nerds and non regular people, and god doesn't like non regular people.

They are a very driven bunch and will take over given an opportunity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johan helge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
15. Anyone is a serious threat

if the Naderites on DU get their way, and liberals vote only for 100 % perfect liberals.


http://demopedia.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x7354478
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marsala Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
16. She is a joke. Why? Because even RedState doesn't see her as a contender anymore
Erickson, Jeff Emanuel and the rest of them have given up on her as a serious presidential candidate. And they ARE the fringe. Beyond them lies only the most looney of lunatics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gordianot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
17. If a skinny kid with hot underpants can be a threat so can Sarah Palin.
Edited on Mon Jan-11-10 06:23 PM by gordianot
She is largely responsible for stirring up the stupid and ignorant in this country, Fox News is perfect for her brand hate. Combine her with Beck and you will definitely get a really unstable combination for the really stupid and ignorant. The bulging idiocy and threat of the RW and Miltia types should never be discounted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Who is this skinny kid from Nigeria with hot underpants that you are referring to?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
18. It is true, the Repubs have been looking for a second-coming of Reagan.
This vacuous twit is just the ticket for them.

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cartoonist Donating Member (188 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
20. Will Nader still be alive?
I would suggest your efforts fighting our president would be better served fighting this evil and looming threat to our country.
-
Unrepentant Naderites will back some third party candidate who will appeal to their conscience, thereby allowing Sarah to waltz into the White House. Republicans aren't the only ones who forget history.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
21. The rube-licons will never run a female for president. They like their women to walk behind.
In fact I think Palin got a little too uppity for John McStrange.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
23. Trying to give the American public some respect I am going to say they, on the ave, are not stupid.
Edited on Mon Jan-11-10 06:58 PM by rhett o rick
However, having said that, I will agree that they are very susceptible to propaganda. This is why, IMO, we need to get our propaganda machine running. We must find some way other than the CorpMedia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
24. You'll be happy to know, Capn Sunshine,
that I never thought of her as a joke bc I when I got into politics in 2000 I saw what the corporatemedia did to prop up bushjr..and kept propping him and excoriating the man who actually won that election.

palin took away the glow of our Dem Convention thanks to the "media" making it all about her after her speech ragging on Senator Obama bc he was a "community organizer":scared:

The Beautiful Fourth of July Fireworks at the White House with the Memorials to the Fallen were nothing compared to palin's quitting the Gov's seat and freeing herself up to hit the trail and lie more.

I know that lying sociopaths are the favorite with the mediawhores..them being in that club..Sociopathic motormouths are even better..

I was discussing politics with someone at work today and ..after we were talking about the country and how much Pres Obama has done with what he got handed from bushcheney.. I said.."I'm just so grateful mccain and palin didn't get in". He said, "she might be interesting/she's really smart"..

After almost losing it..I set him straight in a hurry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Capn Sunshine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #24
28. That's what is out there "she's really smart"
its very scary, what they're doing. You can see it coming down the highway.
:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liquid diamond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
27. After 8 years of Bush, some people here
claim Palin is too stupid to become president. Since when does stupidity prevent one from becoming president?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC