Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sources: Health Care Reform Talks 'Approaching the End'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-15-10 09:22 AM
Original message
Sources: Health Care Reform Talks 'Approaching the End'
Edited on Fri Jan-15-10 09:23 AM by jefferson_dem
Sources: Talks 'Approaching the End'
Jonathan Cohn

Negotiations over health care reform continued into the wee hours of Friday morning, as President Obama presided over a White House meeting with his top advisers and congressional leaders.

The group met in the Cabinet room. Obama didn't leave until just before 1 a.m. The congressional delegation, which included House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, didn't depart until 1:25.

No agreement was reached and talks will continue today. But several sources from the administration and Capitol Hill suggested that a deal was getting close. "I think we are approaching the end," one Democratic source said.

Multiple, sometimes contradictory stories about the details of negotiations were circulating throughout Washington world all night long. But those with direct knowledge of the talks said there was an emerging, if still fluctuating, consensus that insurance exchanges in the new system would be some sort of state-national hybrid--possibly a blending of the proposals that gives states more autonomy than the House proposal envisioned but gives the federal government more regulatory oversight than the Senate proposal initially sketched out.

<SNIP>

Whatever the net addition of new money, a key issue will be how to spend it. The biggest weaknesses of the Senate bill, relative to its House counterpart, are in so-called actuarial value and overall limits on out-of-pocket spending. The low actuarial value, in particular, would mean higher cost-sharing for a large number of people with moderate- to heavy medical expenses. (High out-of-pocket limits also mean higher cost-sharing, but they tend to affect only the very sickest people, since only the very sickest people spend enough to reach those limits.)

But improving actuarial value costs a lot of money--precisely because it affects so many people. It also raises more political opposition among even some moderate Senate Democrats. As such, discussions were apparently moving towards improving, instead, the subsidies for purchasing insurance--although sources cautioned again that, at least as of very early this morning, discussions remained extremely fluid.

The goal, all week long, has been to wrap up negotiations today, so that language could go to the Congressional Budget Office.

http://www.tnr.com/blog/the-treatment/sources-talks-approaching-the-end
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-15-10 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
1. The speed at which they're going is the main thing that scares me...
.... about the Mass race. Eeeek!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imajika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-15-10 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. They are speeding this along precisely because of Mass...
Obama, Reid and Pelosi know we may lose this race.

They'd need to have a deal and get it through before Brown is seated.

Honestly though, if Scott Brown actually pulls an upset and wins, and the Democratic Party tries to force this through before he is seated, my guess is a few of the conservadems like Nelson or Lincoln will stop it. They'd see the message the Mass special election sent and delay their support for cloture until Brown is in.

Bottom line, if Brown wins on Tuesday, HCR is a corpse and a years worth of effort goes down the drain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-15-10 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. ahhh yes and if Brown wins ..reconciliation can take place and it would put the Public Option back
Edited on Fri Jan-15-10 11:07 AM by flyarm
in play!

Heaven forbid Obama doesn't protect Big Pharma and the Insurance Profit and Gouging of American's bill!


remember this..

Rahm Emanuel Tells Liberals To Kiss His Arse
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-15-10 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. The public option can not be done by reconciliation
Every Senate expert has said this - because of the Byrd amendment. So, you can stop cheering Brown on - even in Huge text with multiple colors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-15-10 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. The House can just pass the Senate bill.
That's really the worst case scenario at this point, even with a Brown win. The Senate won't have to re-vote if the House passes an identical bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-15-10 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Which I think is what Weiner is alluding to here....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-15-10 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
7. It's taking too long, IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC