Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Winner May Not Be Sworn in Until February (Roll Call)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 07:05 AM
Original message
Winner May Not Be Sworn in Until February (Roll Call)
Winner May Not Be Sworn in Until February
By Kathleen Hunter and Emily Cadei, CQ-Roll Call

The office of Majority Leader Harry Reid says there will be no attempt to swear in a new senator until Massachusetts gets all the right paperwork to Washington. Appointed Sen. Paul G. Kirk Jr. , a Democrat, in the meantime will keep the job and cast the votes. “When there is a certified winner in Massachusetts, the Senate has received appropriate papers, and the Vice President is available, the successor to Sens. Kennedy and Kirk will be sworn in,” said Regan Lachapelle, a Reid, D-Nev., spokeswoman.

Actually, Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. isn’t essential to the process, even though he is president of the Senate; there’s plenty of precedent for a swearing-in to be handled by substitutes.

But there’s no substitution for the proper paperwork.

Federal law requires cities and towns to wait 10 days to receive military and overseas absentee ballots that were mailed by Election Day. From there, the municipalities forward their returns to the Massachusetts Secretary of the Commonwealth, who sends the result to the governor’s office for certification. The governor, secretary of the governor’s council and secretary of the Commonwealth each must sign the certification.

William Galvin, a spokesman for the Secretary of the Commonwealth, there has “never been an instance of the governor not signing the certification given to him.”

“It will be done as expediently as it has been done in the past,” he added.

<SNIP>

http://www.cqpolitics.com/wmspage.cfm?docID=news-000003279944&utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=top-stories
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ccharles000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 07:15 AM
Response to Original message
1. k/r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turbineguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 07:17 AM
Response to Original message
2. If Coakley wins
repubs will sue. Elections should be abolished. Democracy, sounds a bit like "Democrat".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 07:22 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. I heard that Glenn Beck was saying yesterday that the election is over...
If Brown doesn't win, it's because Acorn stole it. No joke. These fuckers hate democracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 08:50 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. There's already a notion going around...
.... as you may well know .... that there are hundreds of thousands of deceased registered voters on the rolls and the Dems will "no doubt have a lot of those dead folks out voting."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lamp_shade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 07:21 AM
Response to Original message
3. Harry has a plan. Count on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guruoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
6. Make it six months. And a day....
Edited on Tue Jan-19-10 02:00 PM by guruoo


"The judges issued their final ruling late Monday, stating "Franken received the highest
number of lawfully cast ballots in the Nov. 4, 2008 general election." They also have
determined that Franken is entitled to receive the certificate of election."

"Coleman’s concession, given from the front of his St. Paul home, came just a few hours after
the Minnesota Supreme Court on Tuesday unanimously ruled Franken the winner of last November’s
Senate race. In a 5-0 decision, the court upheld a three-judge panel’s April 14 ruling that
Franken defeated Coleman in the race by 312 votes out of 2.9 million cast. The 32-page opinion
was remarkably decisive, picking apart and rejecting one Coleman legal claim after another."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC