Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

***Mass Senate Special Election - Results Thread***

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 07:54 PM
Original message
***Mass Senate Special Election - Results Thread***
Edited on Tue Jan-19-10 07:55 PM by Clio the Leo
... five minutes and counting.....

Suggested list for Twitterers, I've been following it all day...

http://twitter.com/marcambinder/masen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hoping for the best, but expecting the worst. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. Google Spreadsheet of Towns and Vote Totals...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blueclown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
3. Website for results?

Which site will show county by county results?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. they do town by town....
.... and see the spreadsheet I linked to above
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
4. 8pm scream......
AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
6. here's a results link
Edited on Tue Jan-19-10 08:58 PM by karynnj
http://www.boston.com/news/special/politics/2010/senate/results.html

All at zero now.

Nice Daily Kos thread with lots of resources - http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2010/1/19/826645/-MA-Sen:-Reading-the-Results

Another thread front paged on the polls closing - http://www.dailykos.com/story/2010/1/19/826984/-MA-Sen:-Polls-Closing
(This is a great link where people are getting results in quickly and comparing them to 2008 (Obama) and 2002(Romney Gov) race)


(edited to fix top lingk - thanks to comment from DrunkenIrishman Thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. That's some article about another Dem loser.
Edited on Tue Jan-19-10 08:04 PM by Drunken Irishman
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
8. I am watching the MSNBC coverage
with Keith and Rachel.

It is going to be a long night.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Long night might be the best we can hope for.
She could eek out a very tight win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. Zogby predicted a one point victory by Coakley
but he said that was his gut instinct. Zogby expects Democratic GOTV to be critical.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
totodeinhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
10. Rachael just said on MSNBC that the vote was lighter in heavily Dem districts such as AA
neighborhoods. But I'm still keeping my finders crossed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Coakley did not do well in Southie
according to Norah O'Donnell
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. Who couldn't have guessed that: Democrats are demoralized.
The White House and the Democrats in the Senate put Wall Street, War, Bankers and Insurance Companies over real people, creating "new" jobs, stopping home foreclosures.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #15
80. not demoralized. Just lazy.
People come out to vote when they're mad, not when they're happy.

Democrats got their president in. The vast majority of registered democrats see their work as done.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #80
82. Poll after poll show otherwise.
Democrats did vote. High voter turnout, Teaser. Not lazy. Not this time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #82
83. high voter turnout doesn't mean much
it depends which voters turn out.

I am curious as to how many inner city Bostonians (underclass) voted. My hunch is not many. Yet poll the same subset as to how much they like the Obama administration, I guarantee the numbers are astronomical.

The poor and poorly educated often do not even know when non-presidential elections are happening. Much less an off year election. Presidential elections are the end all and be all of elections for some people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
11. Rasmussen Poll part one...
Rasmussen Reports has conducted an Election Night survey of 1,000 voters in the Massachusetts special election for U.S. Senate. Data will be released on this page throughout the evening.
Polls closed in Massachusetts at 8:00 p.m. Eastern in the race between Democrat Martha Coakley and Republican Scott Brown.
Preliminary results include:
Among those who decided how they would vote in the past few days, Coakley has a slight edge, 47% to 41%.
Coakley also has a big advantage among those who made up their mind more than a month ago.
Seventy-six percent (76%) of voters for Brown said they were voting for him rather than against Coakley.
Sixty-six percent (66%) of Coakley voters said they were voting for her rather than against Brown.
22% of Democrats voted for Brown. That is generally consistent with pre-election polling.

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections2/election_2010/election_2010_senate_elections/massachusetts/first_look_at_massachusetts_election_night_poll_data
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vicar In A Tutu Donating Member (298 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. "22% of Democrats voted for Brown"
That seals it, if true. But the word 'Democrat' must be used in a past-tense - even if they never vote GOP again, said people are far more Republican than anything else. You simply don't vote for a character like Brown if you are anything like a Democrat at heart.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #14
22. How do you know 22% voted for Brown.. no exit polls for this election
just saying
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vicar In A Tutu Donating Member (298 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. I was quoting the post above mine...
...which has results from a Rasmussen survey which suggests as much. If true - and it's a big if, of course - it means that Coakley doesn't have a chance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
12. 1% in.....Brown 54, Coakley 45.
1% of precincts in. Brown 54, Coakley 45. And, yes, it means nothing.

http://twitter.com/TheHyperFix/status/7967704962
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 08:18 PM
Response to Original message
17. P: 7 of 2,168 precincts counted: Brown 55%, Coakley 45%
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
18. Lowell 94 % of votes Coakley 69 % - it is going to be a long night where Boston is
going to matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. So she's performing about as well as expected in Lowell?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #21
35. Apparently it was a misprint. it is 9 %, not 94 .
Edited on Tue Jan-19-10 08:31 PM by Mass
I was wondering how they counted 94 % that fast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
19. TPM has a scoreboard...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
20. Bolton, a relatively populous town that gave Obama 55%, has finished reporting:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. Ouch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. Ish Kabittle
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #20
29. How reliable is that?
Any other source?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
One of Many Donating Member (85 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
26. Another link
NYTimes has the score on the front page, servers seem to be running well for now

http://www.nytimes.com/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
One of Many Donating Member (85 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. 51 / 48 / 1 @ 7% reporting
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
27. Brown needed 61% in Andover, he got 64%
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. Of course. Looks like all the luck is breaking his way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FVZA_Colonel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #30
33. At least it's narrowed from 55/45
51/48/1 according to the TPM link.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kdillard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #27
31. Damn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #27
32. Except he is confusing Andover and North Andover.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
34. Brown won Milford by 2000 votes....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kdillard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. It's early but things don't seem to be breaking Coakley's way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #36
39. In fact, I am pleasantly surprised. Big cities are not in. If the comparison is with Obama or
Kennedy, she will do poorly. But this is not what it is about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #34
40. We also got to remembe Pres. Obama carried the state 62-36.
Brown could still do better in some of those areas and lose. I don't expect Coakley to win 62-36.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 08:33 PM
Response to Original message
37. 10k vote lead for Brown with 8-9% precincts
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 08:33 PM
Response to Original message
38. 11% vote in: Brown 53, Coakley 46
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
41.  Early returns out of Boston have Coakley Brown at even
http://twitter.com/RedMassGroup/status/7968411009

(NOT good, she needed to do WELL in Boston)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
42. Brown 53% - 46% with 13% reporting
53% - 46% with 13% reporting
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FVZA_Colonel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #42
43. I'm not feeling too good right now.
Edited on Tue Jan-19-10 08:39 PM by FVZA_Colonel
Hopefully, the Democrats will figure out something to get the bill passed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
44. Brown needed 59% in Danvers, he got 63%.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #44
45. IT's over.
lol oh well. Hopefully things get better in November.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #45
48. Because some twitter guy said so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #48
49. Well yeah.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #48
51. My town went to Coakley with 59 %. Not a big town, but a good result as it went to Romney.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
46. Coakley lead shrinking in Boston, now 51-48.
http://twitter.com/universalhub/status/7968575801

(if she LOSES Boston I'm jumping out the window! lol)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
47. 17% in: Brown (R) 52%, Coakley (D) 47%.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #47
50. ugh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kdillard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #47
53. This sucks. I am hoping things turn around but sigh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
52.  21% reporting: Brown 53%; Coakley 46%
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
54. 25% in. Brown 52, Coakley 47.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 08:45 PM
Response to Original message
55. 55% for coakley with 9% reporting in Boston
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sanity Claws Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #55
58. That's good news
I needed to hear something promising
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Obamacare Donating Member (99 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #55
59. Did they get the Minority
vote out for Coakley? One would think Boston of all places would easily go to Coakley!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
56. Whoever wins, I hope they look at the map.
Rich towns and big cities go to Coakley.

Blue Collar towns and rural central Mass go to Brown.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
57. 30% in. Brown 52, Coakley 47
"if you are a D, start to get worried."
http://twitter.com/TheHyperFix/status/7968888471
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kdillard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #57
65. Damn. I am so upset this seat is going to go to that teabagger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
60. 36% in. Brown 52, Coakley 47.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
61. Coakley starting to pull away in Boston 60-40% with 16% reportin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #61
63. Thank you Clio... for keeping us informed.. I am watching this like a hawk
Edited on Tue Jan-19-10 08:53 PM by Peacetrain
AND PRAYING


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
senseandsensibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #61
64. Woo hoo
Thanks for some good news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #64
68. ehh....
Stat from a pollster friend. In 08 Obama won Boston 79-20. Coakley ahead 56-43 with 10% in Boston reporting.

http://twitter.com/TheHyperFix/status/7969182928
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FVZA_Colonel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #61
67. Let's hope it stays that way, and that it closes the gap.
TPM puts it at 42,000 votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
62. 40% in. Brown 53, Coakley 46.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
66. Cape is going solidly Brown, 2-to-1 in Bourne; Western Mass. is trending Coakley.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phoonzang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
69. Time to open my bottle of defeat whiskey.
This is pitiful. I don't know who I despise more, the Coakley campaign, the spineless, do-nothing dems in congress, or the people of Massachusetts who voted to put a teabagger in Ted Kennedy's seat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #69
74. I hear you
Any democrat who voted for Brown just spit on Ted kennedy's grave.I don't like the sellout to
Conservatives on the health care reform myself but what Is Brown going to do?Vote against everything
Ted Kennedy stood for and anything Obama purposes.Inless Coakley starts picking up In votes this Is
over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FVZA_Colonel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #69
75. Vote gap is some 67,000 thousand now.
I'll join you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phoonzang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:01 PM
Original message
Cheers! Down the hatch.
Well I didn't have anything important to do at work tomorrow anyway. ;(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
70. 45% in. Brown 52, Coakley 47
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 08:56 PM
Response to Reply #70
71. Perspective....
Brown overperforming targets in red areas he was supposed to win. Coakley holding own in blueish areas.

http://twitter.com/universalhub/status/7969196233
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
senseandsensibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #71
72. Give Brown all the red areas
Can he win with just those? I never thought there were enough of those areas in Mass to win an election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
senseandsensibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #71
73. Give Brown all the red areas
Can he win with just those? I never thought there were enough of those areas in Mass to win an election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
76. thread two here...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brooklynite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
77. Rachel Maddow: 50% in -- 52.5% for Brown / 46.5% for Coakley
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #77
81. Not much of a change @ 63% reporting.
52.6% Brown
46.4% Coakley
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
totodeinhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
78. I'm getting a very sick feeling in my stomach.
But if these results hold up, the campaign to oust Brown in 2012 starts tomorrow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #78
79. no sick feeling necessary
just a new enemy to probe for weaknesses is all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
totodeinhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #78
84. Breaking - the AP has called it for Brown according to CNN. No link yet.
Edited on Tue Jan-19-10 09:26 PM by totodeinhere
Edit - MSNBC says Coakley has called Brown to concede.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #84
85. Yeah.
Damn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC