Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

***Mass Senate Special Election - Results Thread #2***

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 08:59 PM
Original message
***Mass Senate Special Election - Results Thread #2***
hour two....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. More than halfway counted. 52% in. Brown 52.5, Coakley 46.5.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. Boston update: 21% in. Coakley 58, Brown 40. Not enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Obamacare Donating Member (99 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Damn
Coakley needs to at least hit 50%, come on Boston, don't let us down!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CBR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. On Boston.gov it is 61.6% - 37.3% with 37% reporting. Still not
going to pull it out for her. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. Liberal Northamptoncame through for Coakley: she needed 76%, she got 79%, but not enough overall
http://twitter.com/Dave_Wasserman/status/7969394927
Liberal Northampton (in the Western MA Maddow Belt) came through for Coakley: she needed 76%, she got 79%, but not enough overall
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrToast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
4. Not looking good
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:02 PM
Response to Original message
7. Brown lead now near 78K votes...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. I just read TPM's review of her campaign. Ugh.
What a fucking mess. What an ignorant. . . . never mind. And what a complete failure by the White house, losing contact or interest in a critical seat, at the worst possible time.

We need new leadership in the D party. The current crowd was lucky, and now their true stripes are visible. They show just how incompetent they are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blitzburgh55 Donating Member (320 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #7
16. Hyper fix tweet says
"theory among Dems is that Coakley needs to carry Boston by 25+ points (and probably more)..."

Is this true? If so, right now she's up

MARTHA COAKLEY DEM 42138 64.00%
SCOTT P. BROWN REP 22965 34.88%
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChicagoSuz219 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
8. If this is a special election...
...how long would the person serve before having to run again?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. I believe 3 yrs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChicagoSuz219 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 11:18 PM
Response to Reply #12
51. On the plus side...
...this should make Lieberman pretty much irrelevant now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #51
53. Why Rahm and others made him relevant in the 1st place, I do not understand
We just had a huge house and a decent senate lead, with an incredibly popular president.

talk about squandering the lead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
9. 60% in. Brown 53, Coakley 46.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
11.  62-37 Coakley in Boston.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sanity Claws Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. I can't get Boston. com to load
Sounds like it's overwhelmed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FVZA_Colonel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. The TPM return list seems a bit out of date compared to what's being posted here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FVZA_Colonel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Unfortunately, I don't think that'll be enough at this point.
Here's hoping Democrats can get a health bill passed before MA is legally required to be sworn in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoccoR5955 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. The election has yet to be certified, and with reported voting irregularities...
this could take quite some time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:06 PM
Response to Original message
15. 63% in, Brown 53, Coakley 46.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:08 PM
Response to Original message
17. Nate: "At this point, forget the projections"
"At this point, forget the projections -- Coakley just has a fair # of raw votes she'd need to make up."

http://twitter.com/fivethirtyeight/status/7969628451

Unfortunately, I dont know what he means by that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
senseandsensibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. Norah on MSNBC just said
that Brown's camp is no longer expecting a "blowout" and that this could be close.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoccoR5955 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. What Nate means is that
Coakley has a fair amount of votes in places where she needed to make up votes to win, so forget any projections or polls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blitzburgh55 Donating Member (320 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #17
23. She's up 27% in Boston with 44% in n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #23
28. Now up 32% with 53% in. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krawhitham Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #17
29. she is down 90,000 votes
and can not over come it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krawhitham Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #17
43. WBZ-TV projects Brown the winner
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
20. 66% in. Brown 53, Coakley 46.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
24. Coakley up 27 pts in Boston with 47% in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. Howard Dean just said if the results so far do NOT include Boston, Coakley's in good shape!
I hope he's right!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoccoR5955 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #26
33. As of this minute... City of Boston Unofficial Results are
SENATOR IN CONGRESS
Total
Number of Precincts 254
Precincts Reporting 135 53.1 %
Total Votes 72446
Number of Uncast Votes 8
MARTHA COAKLEY DEM 47475 65.53%
SCOTT P. BROWN REP 24152 33.34%
JOSEPH L. KENNEDY LIB 728 1.00%
Write-in Votes 91 0.13%

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #26
35. It includes half of Boston. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #35
38. Oh. So half of Boston IS in? Oh, well. Maybe they're not Coakley districts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #26
39. Several major towns which are democratic strongholds are missing or incomplete.
I am not sure if this will be enough though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #39
42. Well, at least there's a sliver of hope then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #42
46. Turnout seem very low - 31 % in Springfield.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
25. Coakley manages to carry her own home town...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #25
31. Not really a surprise,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kdillard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
27. Sigh. Is there any way this can turn around?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #27
34. See my post #26 right above re: Howard Dean.
Edited on Tue Jan-19-10 09:16 PM by jenmito
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoccoR5955 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #27
36. As Yogi Berra said...
"It ain't over till it's over."
There's a long way to go yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
30. God Damnit...
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
32. 66% of the Commonwealth reporting 53% 46% BROWN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
37. 69% in. 53 Brown, 46 Coakley.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FVZA_Colonel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
40. Coakely Concedes (according to Brown aide)
Edited on Tue Jan-19-10 09:19 PM by FVZA_Colonel
9:13 p.m. -- Coakley has conceded in a call to Scott Brown, according to a Brown aide.

http://www.boston.com/news/local/breaking_news/2010/01/live_coverage_o.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sanity Claws Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #40
44. OMG
What's the hurry? The counting is not even done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FVZA_Colonel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #44
45. Boston.com has the lead at 102,000 some votes for Brown.
Unless Boston really comes in for Coakely...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
41. Cilizza is reporting that Coakley has conceeded
Edited on Tue Jan-19-10 09:19 PM by Clio the Leo
http://twitter.com/TheHyperFix/status/7969988570

and he knows what he's talking about .... other sources are as well
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kdillard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #41
47. Sucks. I guess she realizes she doesn't have the votes to make up the difference. I
am gutted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
48. The press is going to enjoy this for the next week
"Democrats are crashing and burning-- lose liberal Massachusetts vote!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
49. for crying out loud! Even her concession speech sucked! NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 10:41 PM
Response to Original message
50. well was that his first gaffe?
Telling the world that his daughters were available?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kdillard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 11:22 PM
Response to Reply #50
52. Sigh. Hopefully the people of MA will wake up and this clown
Will only serve one term.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC