So, can we get rid of Lieberman now?
PassingFair
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 09:58 PM
Original message |
So, can we get rid of Lieberman now? |
|
Doesn't he lose his mystical "60th" vote now.
Can he NOW PLEASE be stripped of his committee chairmanships?
PLEASE?
|
Lord Helmet
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 10:01 PM
Response to Original message |
gravity
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 10:02 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Lets pass health care reform first |
bigwillq
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 10:03 PM
Response to Original message |
mth44sc
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 10:03 PM
Response to Original message |
|
If the Dems want to tell us who they are - this would be teh first order of business...
|
treestar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 10:03 PM
Response to Original message |
5. We still need him. Plus one moderate republican. |
|
otherwise, all we can get are budget reconciliation bills.
|
PassingFair
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
6. It is my understanding that expanding Medicare can be done through |
|
reconciliation.
Lieberman must be flushed.
|
treestar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
7. Apparently for the budget reconciliation the bill has to do nothing but |
|
affect the budget - it can't have anything extraneous.
I haven't gotten far enough to figure out if Medicare could be expanded that way.
|
Betty Karlson
(902 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
8. And it will send a strong message to other |
|
"less loyal" senators: you mess with the bill, we mess with you. Let's whip some discpline into the remaining senators. Bush reigned the U.S. with 52 GOP senators!
|
mrbarber
(884 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 10:29 PM
Response to Original message |
9. No, that would be mean. |
|
We wouldn't want to piss anyone off or upset anyone, would we?
|
PassingFair
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
10. Of course, you're quite right. |
|
I don't want people to think we're mean.
What was I thinking?
|
davidpdx
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 11:16 PM
Response to Original message |
11. I say flush him and Bacus as well |
|
Take Nelson and put him in the toilet as well. Pelosi ought to do the same thing in the House. We are fucked after tonight and have nothing to lose. HC isn't going to get passed once Brown is seated. I'm pissed, this is so FUCKED UP! Fuck the Conservadems!
|
704wipes
(966 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 11:21 PM
Response to Original message |
12. ban him from the caucus; strip committee chairs - NOW |
|
did he endorse Brown; I bet he did. I bet he didn't campaign for Coakly.
|
Faryn Balyncd
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 11:49 PM
Response to Original message |
never cry wolf
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-20-10 11:08 PM
Response to Original message |
14. Joe no longer matters, he is now irrelivant |
|
His only power was as #60... now he does not matter, the silver lining...
|
TheKentuckian
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-21-10 06:06 AM
Response to Original message |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:46 AM
Response to Original message |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.