Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

ACLU Issues Report On Obama Administration's Civil Liberties Record (updated)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 11:49 PM
Original message
ACLU Issues Report On Obama Administration's Civil Liberties Record (updated)
Edited on Tue Jan-19-10 11:57 PM by ProSense

ACLU Issues Report On Obama Administration's Civil Liberties Record

January 19, 2010

First Year Saw Civil Rights Advances And End Of Torture But Continuation Of Overbroad Domestic Surveillance Practices

NEW YORK – The Obama administration's record on restoring civil liberties during its first year in office is mixed, according to a new report analyzing the administration's performance released today by the American Civil Liberties Union. Of a set of 145 detailed recommendations the ACLU made to the new president upon his election, the administration has acted on just over one-third of them.

"Starting with bold executive orders to end torture and close the prison at Guantánamo, and continuing with positive actions in areas like open government and civil rights, the Obama administration has made some significant strides toward restoring civil liberties and the rule of law," said Anthony D. Romero, Executive Director of the ACLU. "But in other areas, the administration has fallen short by allowing some of the Bush administration's most troublesome practices to continue and by failing to take steps that would restore some very fundamental rights and values to American life."

The administration's record on the ACLU's highest priority recommendations – those it asked President Obama to take on his first day in office – is uneven. Despite the president's executive order to close the notorious prison at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, it remains open, detainees remain there without charge or trial and the flawed military commission system is still being used. And while the president ordered an end to torture and the Justice Department has initiated a very limited inquiry into detainee abuse, the president has shown little appetite for encouraging a comprehensive torture investigation that would include high level officials from the Bush administration. The Obama administration has also retained its authority to engage in extraordinary renditions.

On the ACLU's other top priorities – those it asked President Obama to act on within his first 100 days – the administration's record is weak. On issues like spying on Americans, monitoring of activists, terrorism watchlists, the Real ID Act and DNA databases, the administration has carried out none of the ACLU's recommendations.

"Our hope a year ago was that the Obama administration would restore our nation's long tradition of respect for privacy and the rule of law by rolling back the privacy-invading domestic security policies enacted by the Bush administration," Romero said. "Unfortunately, many of those policies have not been reversed, and we now run the risk of seeing them become a permanent part of American life."

On the issues of civil rights, open government, freedom of speech and reproductive freedom, the administration has fared much better, as it has acted on about half of the ACLU's recommendations.

"In the face of enormous domestic and international challenges that naturally occupied much of President Obama's attention, the administration has managed to initiate a lot of positive actions that deserve commendation and which can help put America on a path toward regaining its standing as a global leader in freedom and equality," said Romero. "But it is clear after one year that the administration has a lot more work to do, and the ACLU will continue to vigorously fight for and support such action."

A copy of the ACLU's analysis of the Obama administration's record on restoring civil liberties, including a chart showing which of the ACLU's recommendations the administration acted upon, is available online at: www.aclu.org/america-unrestored


Updated to add:

An Assessment Of The Obama Administration’s Fulfillment Of ACLU Recommended “Actions For Restoring America”

In October 2008, two weeks before the presidential election, the ACLU released “Actions for Restoring America,” a set of detailed recommendations to the new president for concrete steps he should take to restore civil liberties in America. These recommendations were designed to correct assaults upon American freedoms that were implemented during the previous eight years. That document – which was furnished to the Obama and McCain campaigns and, after the election, to President‐elect Obama’s transition team – included recommendations for action on the president’s first day in office, during his first 100 days, and during his first year.

With the anniversary of President Obama’s inauguration upon us, it is now possible to assess the administration’s civil liberties performance during its first year through the prism of its record in fulfilling the ACLU’s specific recommendations. Because our recommendations focused on steps that the new president could take on his own, without a vote by Congress, they provide a unique measure of the administration’s determination to reverse the Bush legacy. For each recommendation, we simply asked the question, “did the administration do this or not?”

This report does not purport to be a complete analysis of the Obama administration’s first‐year record on civil liberties. The ACLU recognizes that the issues at the top of the nation’s agenda are constantly changing, and that different issues inevitably carry different weight. Also, the administration has taken actions – good and bad – that are not reflected in the ACLU’s list. For example, while a significant part of how the administration must be judged is in regard to its actions with Congress, our recommendations were limited to executive actions and did not include steps that only Congress could take. In addition, the administration may be preparing actions in some areas that they have not yet had time to carry out because of delays in the Senate confirmation of staff or other factors. And finally, in some instances, the assessment of how the administration has performed with regard to some of our recommendations is inevitably somewhat subjective, as some recommendations are inherently complicated and can involve multiple levels of fulfillment.

Nevertheless, this report is a valuable snapshot of the administration’s performance on the very broad range of issues that the ACLU concerns itself with, many of which reach deep into the government. These issues have a broad impact on the lives of many Americans, even if some are not the kind that make headlines.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
katandmoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 11:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. That's a failing grade.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 11:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. LOL!
No.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
inna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 12:30 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. looks more like a C to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katandmoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 01:09 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Just over one-third (i.e. under 40%) is a C? Not where I come from.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveOurDemocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 12:01 AM
Response to Original message
3. You think this report is a positive?


The administration's record on the ACLU's highest priority recommendations – those it asked President Obama to take on his first day in office – is uneven. Despite the president's executive order to close the notorious prison at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, it remains open, detainees remain there without charge or trial and the flawed military commission system is still being used. And while the president ordered an end to torture and the Justice Department has initiated a very limited inquiry into detainee abuse, the president has shown little appetite for encouraging a comprehensive torture investigation that would include high level officials from the Bush administration. The Obama administration has also retained its authority to engage in extraordinary renditions.

~snip~

"Our hope a year ago was that the Obama administration would restore our nation's long tradition of respect for privacy and the rule of law by rolling back the privacy-invading domestic security policies enacted by the Bush administration," Romero said. "Unfortunately, many of those policies have not been reversed, and we now run the risk of seeing them become a permanent part of American life."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 12:13 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Yes, considering the hell we're coming out of, absolutely.
"In the face of enormous domestic and international challenges that naturally occupied much of President Obama's attention, the administration has managed to initiate a lot of positive actions that deserve commendation and which can help put America on a path toward regaining its standing as a global leader in freedom and equality," said Romero. "But it is clear after one year that the administration has a lot more work to do, and the ACLU will continue to vigorously fight for and support such action."


And if you bothered to go to the report:

The administration, on a positive note, did fairly well on issues of open government, civil rights, freedom of speech, and reproductive freedom, areas in which they acted on about half of our recommendations.


So there is a lot more to be done, but there has been excellent progress in some areas.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blasphemer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 12:04 AM
Response to Original message
4. Seems to be a fair assessment... nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 12:05 AM
Response to Original message
5. Ouch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frog92969 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 12:22 AM
Response to Original message
7. "bold executive orders to end torture"
I think indictments would've been the appropriate thing.

"flawed military commission system is still being used"
"shown little appetite for encouraging a comprehensive torture investigation"
"retained its authority to engage in extraordinary renditions"

"Our hope a year ago was that the Obama administration would restore our nation's long tradition of respect for privacy and the rule of law by rolling back the privacy-invading domestic security policies enacted by the Bush administration," Romero said. "Unfortunately, many of those policies have not been reversed, and we now run the risk of seeing them become a permanent part of American life."

Completely unacceptable.
How can you claim that this guy represents the Democratic party?
There's no resemblance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frog92969 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 12:24 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Oh, K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 05:24 AM
Response to Original message
11. Sorry
Supporting Domestic Surveillance is an F.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC