Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Barack Obama is only one part of the problem

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 09:30 AM
Original message
Barack Obama is only one part of the problem
Was the MA election a referendum on Barack Obama?

No... it was a referendum on THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY.

Coakley ran a bad campaign but if the Democratic Party was as popular as it was a year ago it would not have mattered whether she campaigned at all. So blaming her is literally true, but misses the point. A lot of Dems who won in 2006 and 2008 ran bad campaigns but won anyway. A lot of pugs won almost accidentally in 1994.

Obama is the top Dem so he gets disproportionate blame and credit for what the party does, and properly so. He is the Party's leader and the Party has dived into the toilet under his leadership.

But it's about the Democratic Party... the combination of WH, congress and even some state-level pols.

The people are not upset that we are spending so much money. They are upset that we are spending so much money without clearly and dramatically changing their environment and circumstances. They are not feeling the benefits.

One can say they *should* be feeling it... one can produce lists of programs and tables of big numbers to show they *should* be feeling it.

But if they are not feeling it then that's what it is. It's a problem to be solved.

There is nothing we can do to reduce the deficit in the near-term without destroying this country. Deficit spending is all that is propping up our economy. (Even raising taxes on the rich is little help. That can improve the justice of the situation but would actually hurt the economy right now. The deficit is not a by-product of stimulus. It IS the stimulus. Keynes, people... the deficit is not a side-effect, it... is... the... point.

So, since one option is foreclosed (reducing the deficit anytime soon would wreck us all) then the only choices are:

1) To play politics, flailing for middle-ground non-solutions calculated to appease two totally contradictory views, which is impossible unless one thinks we can fool all the people all of the time, or...

2) Accept that we must spend and focus on spending big on things that people feel... programs calculated to be felt.

As the song says...

"Accentuate the positive. Eliminate the negative. Don't mess with Mister In-Between."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
1. Obama's our leader - he sets the tone. It's time to be less risk adverse. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
2. Good one to quote the Johnny Mercer song! It's mostly the Dems' fault, but Obama picked Kaine, etc.
and it was the Kaine/Obama-led party that let Al Franken twist in the wind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Wow... Johnny Mercer. You're right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
3. Reality has to be acknowledged at some point
We can spend, but we can't spend fast enough or it can't work fast enough.

But the Indies who voted for Brown said the deficit concerned them. So they want to reign in the spending. Top that off with that state already has their health care plan, and so the interests of the rest of us in one doesn't factor in.

So it looks like we won't get a health care plan.

What a perfect storm of awful facts. If Teddy had lived or Coakley and the Dems not taken the seat for granted, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 07:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC