Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

MA was not about Obama but about Red Sox Nation and hunkiness

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
Jersey Devil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 10:16 AM
Original message
MA was not about Obama but about Red Sox Nation and hunkiness
Martha Coakley thinks Curt Schilling was a Yankee fan. Forkin' bloody sock unbelievable! Plus Brown looks great naked!


So those are the two main reasons Coakley lost. It had nothing whatsoever to do with Democrats being pussyfooting cowards who achieved nothing in one year despite promises they were going to turn the political world upside down and on its ear in the 2008 elections.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
1. nonsence..go ahead stay in denial..how's it working for you? eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AspenRose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Time to get the irony meter checked
Edited on Wed Jan-20-10 10:23 AM by AspenRose
I don't think those are the two main reasons by far (Coakley was a weak candidate, she made AWFUL choices, the higher up democrats weren't paying attention to Mass, a sense of entitlement regarding "Teddy's seat"), but they ARE minor considerations. People are stupid and pick candidates based on stupid, superficial things. How else did Sarah Palin get to be the VP candidate? It sure wasn't her political acumen!

Unfortunately we are in the era of TMZ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jersey Devil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. You got better reasons?
Well maybe bloody socks don't matter to you but they sure do to Red Sox Nation!

Plus, the hunky vote is definitely a factor. Everyone knows that LBJ won by a landslide due to his sexy looks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TayTay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #5
27. Yes, talk with the voters not at them
Nobody in MA gave a damn about some naked picture from more than 20 years ago. It had no bearing on the outcome of the race. The stuff about the Red Sox confirmed a view of Martha Coakley that had already formed. It was not definitive, it was confirmative.

Brown won because he made the better pitch to voters that he was one of them and understood their concerns and fears. He recorded ads that used actual Boston voices complete with working class Boston accents. He was not ashamed of his voters or talk down to them. He celebrated them and their power to make change. He flattered them. It worked.

Ignore this or cover it with excuses at your peril.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulsby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #27
35. he also (supposedly) put 200,000 miles on
by driving around the state and pressing the flesh and talking to people.

he IS charismatic as hell, and probably impressed some people, especially those in the stix, that he was a good guy, etc.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #5
28. yes i indeed do have better reasons..see them here>>>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. I hear the same thing eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
44. Right..that wouldn't work into your
shit agenda if it's not blamed on Pres Obama.

Sorry you lose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
2. he's got that jfk thing about him nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
4. Shows once again what we all know about Red Sox fans
to say the least. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcadian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
6. You may be right, people are are absolutely this shallow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jersey Devil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Umm, sarcasm doesn't work here, does it?
LOL, I thought what I meant would be obvious
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AspenRose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. I knew what you meant
It's not the major factor, but it's a minor one
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcadian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. Well I didn't even read what you posted under that dreamy picture
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AspenRose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #12
17. OK, that was funny
Credit where it's due :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #8
15. How could this be taken as anything other than earnestness
"It had nothing whatsoever to do with Democrats being pussyfooting cowards who achieved nothing in one year despite promises they were going to turn the political world upside down and on its ear in the 2008 elections."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
9. Her staff spelled 'Massachusetts' incorrectly and they fear the Cadillac tax. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
10. ******COAKLEY LITERALLY WENT ON VACATION DURING A SPECIAL ELECTION WITHOUT DAILY TRACKING!!*****
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #10
18. ***WE GET IT! YOU ARE CONCERNED THAT OBAMA NOT BE BLAMED FOR ANYTHING WHATSOEVER!!***
Agreed. She ran a piss poor race.

That doesn't not, however, mean that everything is going swimmingly otherwise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jersey Devil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #10
23. Excuses for VA, excuses for NJ, now excuses for MA
Edited on Wed Jan-20-10 10:53 AM by Jersey Devil
They were all boring, lousy candidates who lost because of their own, personal faults and it had nothing whatsoever to do with the national political scene.

Now tap your heels together 3 times and you will be in Kansas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
13. that's mind numbingly simplistic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. It is sarcastic
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jersey Devil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #13
19. Well, IF I were a Sox fan (God forgive me for the thought)
I wouldn't vote for anyone stupid enough to think Schilling was a Yankee fan. Can you imagine if Hillary had said, before her first Senate election, that Babe Ruth was a Cleveland Indian? Even Baby Ricky would have beaten her.

But seriously, my OP was intended as sarcasm. Sure Coakley was an awful candidate. But it happened in VA, NJ and now, of all places, MA. When are we going to get it? It was about doing nothing for a year after promising the world to a lot of desperate voters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hileeopnyn8d Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #19
29. I agree with you about MA
but I think you are letting the right frame your opinion about VA & NJ. It isn't like Obama is the first president whose party lost the governorship of VA, it's been that way since 1977. And New Jersey seems to switch back and forth fairly routinely - 8 years Republican/8 years Democratic.

It wasn't the upset the media and the GOP make it out to be, and letting them frame it that way does just as much to undermine progress as anything else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulsby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #19
37. as a sox fan myself, that was a terrible gaff
she did do very well in boston proper, though.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
16. Obama's in big trouble. His swimsuit pics aren't nearly as lurid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jersey Devil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #16
20. Maybe if he gets one of those infomercial ab machines?
That's it. Sign up at Gold's Gym in DC and he is a shoe in for re-election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
21. It was a combo of Coakley's bad campaign, Brown's charisma, and the Dem party not being populist
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jersey Devil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. or populous
"populist"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #22
24. Yes, populist. Not doing enough about the big banks.
Obama started in with this recently with the "we want our money back" thing. Brown ran as a populist, not as a Rethug or teabagger. Of course, he really is a neo con type teabagger (just a bit more liberal on social issues). Dems did not do enough in the last year to address the public's anger about the economy, hence someone else can step in and tap into that. Indies and Dems who pay less attention then we do can easily be misled and just vote for someone of the same party that got us into this mess in the first place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jersey Devil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #24
25. Yes, true, but on the other hand
we let them do it. Obama has the bully pulpit. Why doesn't he use it? Is he afraid of being called a "partisan"? Hell, we elected a fighter and to those who are completely frustrated now (read MA voters) all they got was a thinker. They want action and they want it NOW. Just like Haiti, food and medical relief will do no good a week or a month from now. It is needed immediately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #25
26. He is too willing to compromise. His cool and collected approach worked
well for the campaign, not so sure it is working in whipping Congress into shape. I am one of Obama's biggest supporters here, but not afraid of constructive criticism that can only help him and the Dem party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
30. Sorry, once again it was the economy stupid.






This election was not about some stupid centerfold.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jakes Progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
31. Keep telling yourself that if it helps you.
The MA election wasn't about Obama the man, but about the Obama administration and the lackluster, pussy-footing Democrats.

In one year this administration has become the agent of compromise and sameness. People want different, and we haven't gotten that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jersey Devil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #31
32. We knew that
Pardon my use of the Royal Plural but I am feeling rather haughty today, somewhat like Martha did before the election, or so I'm told.

Did you read my comment under the hunky pic in the OP?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jakes Progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #32
39. I don't know you.
You don't know me.

You said: "It had nothing whatsoever to do with Democrats being pussyfooting cowards who achieved nothing in one year despite promises they were going to turn the political world upside down and on its ear in the 2008 elections."

You didn't put any disclaimer or even a sarcasm smilie. Sure it is a stupid statement, but do you not think that there are many here who say something like this with belief and conviction? Don't blame me for not knowing what was in your head when you typed. If I wrote a post titled "Iraq war vital to American family safety', those who lit into me would be justified in thinking I was being serious since there are many who really think this. No matter how outrageous a statement may be on an open forum, you need to try to be a little clearer. Notice that many didn't "get it". I know it seems cool to be sarcastic without letting people know you are being sarcastic, and it feels so good to think that only the cool kids will get it, but in reality, you just wrote a very silly OP without any way for the reader to know you didn't mean it. How could I possibly know that you weren't one of "those"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jersey Devil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #39
43. Jeez, lighten up, will ya?
It is healthier to laugh once in a while. We lost an election, not our first born children.

Now, if you were really "cool" you'd also know that Curt Schilling's bloody sock was full of ketchup and not real blood.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jakes Progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #43
47. Jeez, try to be cogent. will ya? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
icee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
33. Maybe Martha should have gotten naked. Couldn't have
hurt. Or could it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulsby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #33
38. jpegs please
how am i supposed to form an opinion w/o jpegs?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
icee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #38
40. I'm a Photoshop master but that would be against the rules
here. I do not understand why Massachusetts could not have come up with a better candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulsby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #40
41. true dat
but it wasn't so much what she had going for her (or didn't), it was what she DID with what she had going for her.

she didn't drive around MA, pressing flesh, she was mostly absentee, she said some unforgivable things (schilling), and she had an entitlement mindset.

if you look at her on paper, she's about equivalent to brown (lawyer, longtime ma resident, decent job history). it was the execution that sucked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
icee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #41
42. Yeah...unless she was a mole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
34. The Red Sox?
WTF? If this is true then Massachusetts voters are the stupidest people on the planet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jersey Devil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. That must be some pic I posted with the OP if no one read what's under it
Coffee anyone?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #36
46. But, that's a bunch of shit, too..
because they have achieved a lot if anyone would pay attention instead working on their cheap shots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freddie mertz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
45. ABP (Anything But the President). La La La.
There were many factors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:00 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC