Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"We're in no rush" - Nancy Pelosi (posted under GDP:Frustration sub-forum)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
Jersey Devil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 12:41 PM
Original message
"We're in no rush" - Nancy Pelosi (posted under GDP:Frustration sub-forum)
"We have to get a bill passed -- we know that. That's a predicate that we all subscribe to."

When will that happen? Who knows!

"We're in no rush," Pelosi said.

http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/01/pelosi-there-arent-enough-votes-to-pass-the-senate-bill.php

Sometimes I just want to pull my hair out and scream.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. "Pelosi: There Aren't Enough Votes To Pass The Senate Bill"
Edited on Thu Jan-21-10 12:46 PM by HughMoran
I was just about to rant when I read the link you were referencing.

Your post seems rather deceptive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jersey Devil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Maybe I presumed too much
There are already several threads here stating Pelosi announced she doesn't have the votes so I assumed those here would be aware of them. Besides, the link was in my post and you read it so I don't understand what you mean by "deceptive".

I am not blaming Pelosi for the bill not passing at this time, but to state that there is no urgency to pass it now ("no rush") is just mind boggling to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dave29 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
3. Apparently she is going to present a reconciliation plan to the caucus.
there is another thread
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jersey Devil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. yes, I am aware of that, but
they knew long ago they didn't have to votes to pass the Senate bill without changes so why wasn't that addressed today? It's part of the "no rush" attitude that has me (and I think many voters) very frustrated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. A solid Plan B would have been nice.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
5. 1 fucking year is just too damn fast
fuck off, Nancy. Come back with some votes and we'll talk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC