Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dean To Dems: Give Up On Comprehensive Health Care Reform For Now, Settle For What We Can Get

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 05:17 PM
Original message
Dean To Dems: Give Up On Comprehensive Health Care Reform For Now, Settle For What We Can Get
Edited on Thu Jan-21-10 05:17 PM by Mass
http://tpmlivewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/01/dean-give-up-on-comprehensive-health-care-reform-settle-for-what-we-can-get.php?ref=fpb

Dean To Dems: Give Up On Comprehensive Health Care Reform For Now, Settle For What We Can Get

Former DNC chair Howard Dean, long a fierce proponent of comprehensive health care reform that includes a public health insurance option, said on MSNBC moments ago that the Democrats can't get comprehensive health care reform now and should just settle for something smaller.

"You can't pass the Senate bill in the House, according to the speaker, and we have to respect her desires," Dean said. "So pass something through reconciliation. It doesn't have to be big and complicated. And it shouldn't be. We're not going to get the comprehensive health care bill that we had hoped we were gonna get."

So what can Democrats get? Expansion of Medicaid, a Medicare add-on and a "good, steady down payment" on a health care system that "everyone understands," Dean said.

"The alternative is to give up on health care reform," Dean said.

Just do "something simple," Dean suggested, and expand programs we already have.

"Come back and do comprehensive reform later," he said.


I agree with him as long as we deal with preexisting conditions, and other basic issues like recissions and minimal requirements for healthcare. Even if it is pared down, it needs to be meaningful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. Does "a Medicare add-on" mean Medicare-at-55? (NT)
NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
begin_within Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. Why not just pass 'Medicare for Anyone Who Wants To Buy It'
No mandate, nothing required, private insurance still available, people happy with their plans now could still keep them... just open Medicare to anyone who wants to pay the premium... it would bring more money into Medicare (and with younger subscribers who typically have lower medical costs) would make Medicare more solvent. What is the big deal with allowing anyone to buy Medicare instead of some private insurance?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phx_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. Might be too late. They're already committing Harry Carry.
Dean needs to pick a position and stick with it for more than one day.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyAndProud60 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
4. House Dems are morons. Will we ever again get a bill where mandates pass the Senate?
If that is important for pre-existing, then they should just pass the senate's bill and change it later.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
5. deanfail
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
6. Wow "settle for what you can get"...and that's why we were supposed to kill the bill?
yikes. :thumbsdown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ibegurpard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. these ideas are a hell of a lot better than mandates with token regulation
and cost controls.
the bill stunk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tippy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
8. We have 283 Days .20.Hours...22...Minutes till Election day....
Edited on Thu Jan-21-10 05:40 PM by Tippy
That is why....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC