Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama Blasts Supreme Court Campaign Finance Ruling

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-23-10 08:24 AM
Original message
Obama Blasts Supreme Court Campaign Finance Ruling
Obama Blasts Supreme Court Campaign Finance Ruling
by The Associated Press

President Barack Obama on Saturday sharply criticized a Supreme Court decision easing limits on campaign spending by corporations and labor unions, saying he couldn't "think of anything more devastating to the public interest." He also suggested the ruling could jeopardize his domestic agenda.

In its 5-4 decision this week, the high court overturned two decisions and threw out parts of a 63-year-old law that said companies and unions can be prohibited from using their own money to produce and run campaign ads that urge the election or defeat of particular candidates by name.

Portraying himself as aligned with the people and not special interests, Obama said the decision was unacceptable.

"This ruling opens the floodgates for an unlimited amount of special interest money into our democracy," the president said in his weekly radio and Internet message. "It gives the special interest lobbyists new leverage to spend millions on advertising to persuade elected officials to vote their way — or to punish those who don't."

Obama said that means public servants who stand up to Wall Street banks, oil companies, health insurers and other powerful interests could find themselves under attack when election time rolls around.

"I can't think of anything more devastating to the public interest," he said. "The last thing we need to do is hand more influence to the lobbyists in Washington or more power to the special interests to tip the outcome of elections."

<SNIP>

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=122817596
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
eShirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-23-10 08:26 AM
Response to Original message
1. "Portraying himself as aligned with the people and not special interests"
ha ha

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glowing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-23-10 08:30 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Don't you like that slanted word "portraying himself". So, is he really a corp.
stooge? Or is he really a People person? AND how in the world are we ever going to dismantle the news conglomerates with this ruling in place? They are too powerful and influential in misleading this nation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quantass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-23-10 08:34 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Found it funny too...
Edited on Sat Jan-23-10 08:36 AM by quantass
Wellp, let's hope he's genuine this time. Time will tell. After all, this would potentially screw him over during reelection in '12, but then maybe corporations will prolly gladly fork over keys to their own companies to his campaign in gratitude of his generous assistance for the last year.

My hope is the MA scare has FINALLY put him on the right track to work for the people....crossing my fingers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-23-10 08:39 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Ah...eternally cynical are we?
I read this line as simply descriptive. Truth: Politicians (yes, POTUS is one :wow:) only make public pronouncements because they want the public to hear what they have to say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tango-tee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-23-10 08:49 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. That jumped out to me as well.
I keep hoping against hope, big dummy me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DisgustedInMN Donating Member (956 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-23-10 08:50 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. To quote a Rep I can't stand...

"Liar!"



(Not you, eShirl)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-23-10 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #7
19. Cozying up to crazy nutbag Joe Wilson now...
Edited on Sat Jan-23-10 12:04 PM by jefferson_dem
Cute.

My advice: Keep digging. It's always good to know exactly where and with whom DUers stand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DisgustedInMN Donating Member (956 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-23-10 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. Which part of " I can't stand" ...
... is it, you don't comprehend? Better break out a dictionary and study up.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-23-10 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #7
27. And you didn't even get that two word quote right.
Edited on Sat Jan-23-10 04:40 PM by SemiCharmedQuark
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DisgustedInMN Donating Member (956 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-24-10 07:48 AM
Response to Reply #27
28. But ... but ... but..
... according to your fellow administration apologist..

... I'm "cozying up" to the asshole?

You can't have it both ways. What's your preference?

:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-24-10 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. I don't think you're cozying up to him by attempting to quote him.
Edited on Sun Jan-24-10 05:12 PM by SemiCharmedQuark
I do think your attempt to be funny was pretty pitiful given that Rachel and Keith played that quote about fifty times over the course of that week and the entire quote is only two words.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DisgustedInMN Donating Member (956 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-25-10 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #29
30. I guess we have something in common then...
... I pity any supposed Democrat that is so infatuated with a dickhead Republican that they carry their quotes around like a prize. Personally, I care fuckall about getting it "just right" when it comes to quotes from shitballs. But you're welcome to idolize anyone you please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-23-10 08:28 AM
Response to Original message
2. FAT Chance Corp Media will carry this story
Edited on Sat Jan-23-10 08:30 AM by FreakinDJ
Unless you enjoy Privatizing the Profits and Socializing the Losses you will get behind overturning the decisions to Granting Corporations Personhood
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-23-10 08:51 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. CNN just broadcast about half of it....
.... if they've shown part of his Youtube before, it has't been often. I was pleasantly surprised.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-23-10 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
9. Message to President Obama: actions speak louder than words
You have made us a lot of promises. You accepted our money and we voted for you to put you in the job you asked us for.

NOW IT'S YOUR TURN TO KEEP YOUR END OF THE DEAL.

Transparency. How's that going, anyway? It sure seems like there's some nasty stuff being covered up by your administration, President Obama. Things like torture, endless detention of people without being charged with anything, and what exactly did go on during the Bush years?

Gay people are still waiting to be treated equally. So they aren't tossed out of the military, and can share the same rights and benefits as...well, as you, Mr President. There was a time when people thought you shouldn't have the same rights due to the color of your skin. Some still feel that way. Being gay is not a choice, it just is. Like having black skin, or blue eyes. Equality is a right, not a privilege.

Health care...yes, we're still waiting for that, too. How many people have died or will die while you and Congress take your time on this? GET. IT. DONE. Force it through, get the best you can then insist on making it right for the people.

You've taken care of Wall Street, now take care of Main Street. I'm sure you can understand why some of us question your intentions. We're still waiting for jobs. The economy will not recover without them. Some of the people close to your in your administration have questionable pasts. Perhaps it's time to bring in some fresh people who aren't compromised from day one.

We're watching you, Mr. President. And you're running out of time. You'll either be like so many of the others, or you truly will make history by bringing the change you promised. It's been luke warm so far. Yes, you've done some great things, but a good many others remain undone.

We're waiting for that change you promised us. Are you going to be a hero, Obama? Or a one termer who turned out to be not much better than the others, despite big promises? It's your choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-23-10 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
10. Good for Obama, but he needs to target Roberts personally!
Republicans constantly attack the 9th Circuit - why don't Democrats go after the activist Supreme Court Justices? Roberts should be impeached for lying during his confirmation. At the very least, Democrats in the house or senate should threaten to bring him before a grand jury to see if he was lying during his confirmation hearings. Even if it never goes that far, Democrats need to send a strong warning to Roberts that he can't get away with just doing everything the Republican party tells him to do. He is supposed to be a judge, not a politician.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-23-10 09:06 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. Here are the Roberts confirmation hearing transcripts. Feel free to go through them
carefully: if you find a prosecutable misrepresentation, lots of us would be glad to know of it

Transcripts: The Roberts Confirmation Hearings
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/linkset/2005/09/14/LI2005091402149.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-23-10 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
11. Stay cheeky DU.
The Democratic President comes out forcefully against the shitball SCOTUS ruling and there's already as much cynical, whiny "critiques" on this thread that if the topic was posted in FreeperVille. Well done, fellas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-23-10 09:02 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. It's easier than actually doing anything about it.
If the world is ending, you don't have to clean your room. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DisgustedInMN Donating Member (956 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-23-10 09:02 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Get back to us ..
.. when he's actually done something more than flap his gums, ok?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-23-10 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. "Flap his gums"...
Dude. Your comment doesn't really deserve the dignity of a response. But I will say that it's pretty ironic that those who probably complained the loudest about Boosh's "unitary executive" are now demanding the President *take action* by immediately and single-handedly overturning a ruling the SCOTUS just handed down three days ago. "HE AIN'T DONE NUTHIN' BOUT IT YET11!!!!!!". You don't quite grasp separation of powers and all that, do ya?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DisgustedInMN Donating Member (956 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-23-10 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. Thanks for the ...
... excuse making and condescending attitude, doooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooood, but I've kind of had my fill of that kind of crap, for now. Do you do the mindreading thing professionally?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crappyjazz Donating Member (886 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-23-10 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #11
16. Here's cheeky for ya
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hansel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-23-10 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #16
25. Here's cheeky for you
Edited on Sat Jan-23-10 04:33 PM by Hansel
I work at a bank and donated over $1000 to Obama. I'm an application programmer. When I made my donations I put down the name of the bank I work at which is required by law. If you pull of the financial institution contributions my $1000 is in there. But I certainly did not make my donation on their behalf. There were a lot of people I work with who also have no influence over bank policy that also donated to Democratic candidates. So you see where I'm going with this?

You are trying to make a point with meaningless data. Unless you have the detail behind the numbers proving that the money came from the corporation itself trying to gain favor you are not providing any evidence that backs up your assumption. If you were awake during the campaign you know that Obama got a tremendous number of donations of over $200 from individuals that get counted in these totals. Many of these people work in the insurance industry because it employs many people.

The Supreme Court decision is a tremendously frightening decision. This country and anyone who cares to hang on to this democracy had better stop with the childish sniping and take this just a little more seriously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dgibby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-23-10 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #11
17. Obermann was more forceful than Obama.
That's why I am instructing my Administration to get to work immediately with Congress on this issue. We are going to talk with bipartisan Congressional leaders to develop a forceful response to this decision. The public interest requires nothing less.

http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/obama-blasts-scotus-decision-citizens-united

"talk with bipartisan Congressional leaders". How'd that work out for HCR?

He's going to "bipartisan" himself out of a job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-23-10 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. Keith is a fucking teevee commentator.
The weekly standard? Good Lord...

Whatever. Laws are actually passed by Congress before they are signed by POTUS. What would you prefer? A benevolent dictatorship... in the "public interest"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-23-10 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. They'll whine about anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-23-10 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
15. Obama does not want to have to keep up with corporate candidate X in the 2012 elections
He is going to have to BEG for money to keep up with the Repub candidate in 2012. I think most Dems don't like this ruling just for that reason alone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-23-10 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
20. I find it particularly funny that John McCain is dead silent.
As is Russ Feingold.

Remember that campaign finance reform bill they co-sponsored?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hansel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-23-10 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #20
26. McCain made a lack luster "I'm disappinted" statement on CNN yesterday
But I hear that Olympia Snowe is livid. So why isn't she on. I thought I heard Feingold was already drafting new legislation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC