Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama to skip jury duty in Chicago suburbs

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-24-10 09:29 PM
Original message
Obama to skip jury duty in Chicago suburbs
Obama to skip jury duty in Chicago suburbs
President has busy week ahead with State of Union speech on Wednesday
updated 9:25 p.m. ET, Sun., Jan. 24, 2010

BRIDGEVIEW, Ill. - President Barack Obama will be skipping jury duty after being summoned in Illinois.

A White House official said Sunday that the president has alerted the court he won't be able to make it.

Obama was summoned for jury duty at the Bridgeview courthouse in suburban Chicago starting Monday. The summons had arrived at the Obama home on Chicago's South Side.

With his first State of the Union speech set for Wednesday, Obama has a busy week ahead.

The president is a graduate of Harvard Law School and a former professor at the University of Chicago Law School.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/35051076/ns/politics-white_house/?ocid=twitter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-24-10 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. When will the RW blather start
about him shirking his "civic duties"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-24-10 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-24-10 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. Have the Obamas not changed their residency to DC? eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harkadog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-24-10 11:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
15. He has a home in Chicago which is his legal residence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-24-10 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. The nerve of him!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cutlassmama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-24-10 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
5. If he no longer resides there he doesn't have to attend nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-24-10 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Technically he does reside there
But this falls truly in the category of Navy Dependent and Hawaii, and California.

It is actually a valid one.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-24-10 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Shhh! You'll deny the "cute" story about how President Obama is really
no different than those of us within the peasant class. :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-24-10 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. You don't think he has a valid excuse not to serve on a jury?
Edited on Sun Jan-24-10 10:57 PM by karynnj
The fact is that any one can ask to be excused for medical or employment reasons - certainly being president of the US counts.

But, as you think that only the peasant class served and as you routinely speak of a wealthy Democratic Senator as being elitist, I thought you might find this interesting. Senator Kerry DID serve on a jury in 2005. He was called, it was a recess, he did not make up an excuse and went.

http://www.boston.com/news/local/articles/2005/11/23/as_foreman_kerry_wins_praise_from_fellow_jurors/

A Republican juror was impressed enough by him she told the paper she regretted her vote.

With the President, it is different - he is always at work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-25-10 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #5
19. I got called to a federal jury in Norfolk even though I told them, accurately, I lived 4 hours away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-24-10 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
8. IMPEACHMENT NOW!!!
Let the idiocy commence from the RW idiots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-24-10 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #8
16. ... they're already here...
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistler162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-24-10 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
9. Usually they allow one postponement!
Edited on Sun Jan-24-10 09:42 PM by whistler162
So he better appear next time!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-24-10 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. He could probably just request an exemption for a minimum of 3 years.
I was excused from further jury duty calls after responding that my hearing loss may be a problem if there is an acoustic problem in the courtroom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChicagoSuz219 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-24-10 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
11. They don't usually take lawyers/lawmakers anyway. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-25-10 12:37 AM
Response to Reply #11
23. Yeah... That's what I thought

...until after three days of an absolute farce of a trial, my clients were looking for help elsewhere.

They'll take lawyers on a jury. The most excruciating thing was that the lawyers for both sides were so awful on direct examination, I found myself fighting the urge to object to their malformed questions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChicagoSuz219 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-25-10 04:45 AM
Response to Reply #23
25. Exactly my point...
...not that they wouldn't be summoned, but that most lawyers will get rid of them in voir dire. (Did I spell that right?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-25-10 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #23
27. I once had 2 judges in my venire
I kept them, defense bounced them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-25-10 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. I was angry at the judge, really...

It was a personal injury / insurance coverage case.

We had the plaintiff's own expert on a videotape deposition state, without hesitation, that he could not say to a reasonable degree of medical certainty that the condition in question was aggravated by the accident.

I looked at the judge and wondered, "And you didn't grant a motion to dismiss on this turkey?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-24-10 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
13. I've never heard of that before
Seriously, any president could be summoned for jury duty - it would happen to Obama

No lawyer is going to want the PoTUS on the jury anyway
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-25-10 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #13
20. Depends on the type of crime being tried. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-24-10 10:59 PM
Response to Original message
14. "I can't report for jury duty...I'm too busy RUNNING THE DAMN COUNTRY."
Seriously, there's no exception for the President of the United States?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-24-10 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
17. I think the President of the United States has an excuse...
I don't think any lawyer or judge would want him serving on a jury anyways - it'd be a huge disruption to the trial, and Obama's in a critical job that can't be set aside for jury duty, or people could DIE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beyurslf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-24-10 11:58 PM
Response to Original message
18. One assumes the defendant (and maybe even a few jurors or attorneys)
may not be able to pass the security clearances needed to sit next to the president all day by the SS anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
inna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-25-10 12:27 AM
Response to Original message
21. unrecommended for ridiculousness
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
starroute Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-25-10 12:34 AM
Response to Original message
22. My husband was once in a jury pool along with our Congressman
They didn't want the Congressman on a jury though -- apparently they try to avoid lawyers in general. Figure they know too much about the law and are prone to thinking they're smarter than the attorneys on the case.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Retrograde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-25-10 03:28 AM
Response to Original message
24. "my job requires me to be out of town until Jan. 20, 2013
and to be on 24-hour call". I think he has an out.

In my county, you get a questionnaire before the summons asking if you have any potential conflicts. And even the summons asks whether you'll actually be in the area for your time - I've had them reschedule me when I said I was planning to be gone during my week. Of course this varies by area, but I'd be surprised if Obama couldn't get out legitimately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CBGLuthier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-25-10 08:58 AM
Response to Original message
26. I would love to see the official paper work
Under reason, it should state:

Otherwise engaged in fixing this broke-ass country.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC