FBI Still Sorting Out 2,500 Cases That Used Flawed Bullet Evidence

[The Straight Story]

FBI Still Sorting Out 2,500 Cases That Used Flawed Bullet Evidence
Monday, January 25, 2010

The FBI’s use of the so-called “comparative bullet lead analysis” has been discredited by federal research, forcing the law enforcement agency to review nearly 2,500 convictions that may have been aided by the now debunked theory.

First developed in the early 1960s, the bullet analysis was based on the idea that trace elements lifted off bullets found at crime scenes could be matched up with bullets found in a suspect’s possession, thus indicating guilt. In 2005, the National Research Council of the National Academy of Science concluded that the FBI’s conclusions from its bullet testing were flawed because millions of bullets can contain trace elements in identical quantities. This revelation forced the FBI to stop relying on the analysis in its investigations and in court, but the agency has been slow to complete its re-examination of the 2,500 cases that may have been tainted by it.

So far, the agency has found 187 convictions that relied on expert FBI testimony about the bullet analysis during trial, prompting officials to notify local prosecutors about these findings. Three convictions that were overturned involved a Colorado man who served 12 years in prison for a double slaying, a Florida man who served 10 years after being convicted of killing his wife, and an Oregon man convicted of a triple slaying.


http://www.allgov.com/ViewNews/FBI_Still_Sorting_Out_2500_Cases_That_Used_Flawed_Bullet_Evidence_100125

[thereismore]

1. Doesn't that make sense that there would be millions of similarly-made bullets out there???

[old mark]

2. They are made in huge batches of literally tons at a time - the lead alloy

and the coating material is used industry wide.

The FBI likes to believe its own propaganda, always has.

mark

[thereismore]

3. Of course. How could this ever have been considered forensic "science" is beyond me. nt

[itsrobert]

4. I always wonder about that

I guess my suspicions were correct.

[TexasObserver]

5. Recommend

[Honeycombe8]

6. This OP should be in General Discussion, I think. nt