|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-25-10 07:48 PM Original message |
Obama: I’d rather be ‘really good one-term president’ than ‘mediocre two-term president.’ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DJ13 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-25-10 07:49 PM Response to Original message |
1. 0 for 2 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
timeforpeace (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-25-10 08:44 PM Response to Reply #1 |
43. Better get the "four more years" chant warmed up. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Luciferous (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-26-10 09:45 PM Response to Reply #1 |
109. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LWolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-26-10 10:12 PM Response to Reply #1 |
111. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
David Zephyr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-25-10 07:50 PM Response to Original message |
2. I'd rather the same thing. So, when does he begin? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jaxx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-25-10 07:57 PM Response to Reply #2 |
10. He didn't piss anything away. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zipplewrath (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-25-10 08:06 PM Response to Reply #10 |
18. He might think so |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheBigotBasher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-26-10 02:12 AM Response to Reply #18 |
85. There is no other time he could have tackled health. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zipplewrath (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-26-10 10:20 AM Response to Reply #85 |
101. Actually a very disciplined senate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
avaistheone1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-26-10 03:09 AM Response to Reply #18 |
87. I believe Obama would sell the White House silver if he could to get a second term. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arkana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-25-10 09:06 PM Response to Reply #10 |
49. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-25-10 07:58 PM Response to Reply #2 |
11. Why do you care? You want him primaried. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rudy23 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-25-10 07:50 PM Response to Original message |
3. This may explain why he does not give a shit about the base. Did he make a deal to cover up Bushco |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jennicut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-25-10 07:53 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. Yeah sure...check out this site...loaded with conspiracy theories... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chulanowa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-25-10 07:56 PM Response to Reply #5 |
8. Sounds like something a few DU'ers would come up with |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
provis99 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-25-10 07:59 PM Response to Reply #8 |
13. The Democrats sell out to corporations; the Republicans sell out to corporations. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chulanowa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-25-10 08:30 PM Response to Reply #13 |
35. They're also both mammals, OMFG! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DJ13 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-25-10 07:56 PM Response to Reply #3 |
9. I think were entering a period of single term Presidents |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rudy23 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-26-10 10:18 AM Response to Reply #9 |
100. If you take away that second election, there's really no accountability for the President |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
secondwind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-25-10 10:00 PM Response to Reply #3 |
69. you ARE joking, aren't you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rudy23 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-26-10 10:17 AM Response to Reply #69 |
99. Kinda. Why hasn't his DOJ touched the Siegelman case, though? Some deal had to be made over Rove. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberal N proud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-26-10 07:24 AM Response to Reply #3 |
92. Did you read the text of the interview or listen to it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
donco6 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-25-10 07:51 PM Response to Original message |
4. I'd rather he be a really good president. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flvegan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-25-10 07:54 PM Response to Original message |
6. I'd rather he'd be a "really great" two-term president. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rockymountaindem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-25-10 08:02 PM Response to Reply #6 |
14. Exactly. He needs to start thinking in those terms. Besides, name a good one-term Prez. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-25-10 07:55 PM Response to Original message |
7. Deleted message |
slipslidingaway (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-25-10 07:59 PM Response to Reply #7 |
12. As explained many times by several people, it is the direction that many... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uponit7771 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-25-10 08:02 PM Response to Reply #12 |
16. Obama is taking us in a BETTER "direction", what's wrong with that? TIA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slipslidingaway (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-25-10 08:12 PM Response to Reply #16 |
24. I do not consider mandatory purchase of private insurance a Better direction... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
firedupdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-25-10 08:02 PM Response to Reply #7 |
15. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uponit7771 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-25-10 08:06 PM Response to Reply #7 |
19. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jesus_of_suburbia (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-25-10 08:05 PM Response to Original message |
17. Let's hope he starts being a good President in his second year! I'm waiting for action, not words. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uponit7771 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-25-10 08:07 PM Response to Reply #17 |
20. Obama promise meter establishes that he's taken action |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-25-10 08:15 PM Response to Reply #20 |
26. They won't read that..they'd rather shove their own |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fire1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-25-10 09:33 PM Response to Reply #26 |
60. Too bad that doesn't work with informed people. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dave29 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-25-10 08:49 PM Response to Reply #17 |
48. what action are you missing, he has done more than most first year Presidents |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jesus_of_suburbia (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-25-10 09:45 PM Response to Reply #48 |
62. Most first year Presidents don't have as much capital as he did. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fire1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-25-10 08:09 PM Response to Original message |
21. Whatever he does is not going to be enough for some folks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
firedupdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-25-10 08:10 PM Response to Reply #21 |
22. yup....they want him to fail. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnorman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-25-10 08:10 PM Response to Original message |
23. Just recently spotted elsewhere on DU: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jim Sagle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-25-10 08:13 PM Response to Original message |
25. Translation: 'Fuck the base, I'm a Republican and proud of it. Tough titty if you don't like it.' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-25-10 08:15 PM Response to Reply #25 |
28. When it comes to comments like these, the President has a point. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-25-10 08:25 PM Response to Reply #28 |
33. Deleted message |
Fire1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-25-10 08:31 PM Response to Reply #33 |
36. If the banks had collapsed there would have been a |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jim Sagle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-25-10 08:35 PM Response to Reply #36 |
38. There was never going to be a collapse. TARP was a stickup not a fixup. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fire1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-25-10 08:40 PM Response to Reply #38 |
39. Then why did the banks pay it back? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jim Sagle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-25-10 08:43 PM Response to Reply #39 |
42. So the execs could freely pay out big bonuses. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fire1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-25-10 08:46 PM Response to Reply #42 |
46. Ok! So, where does the "stick up" come into play? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jim Sagle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-25-10 09:33 PM Response to Reply #46 |
59. You don't really think the money was ALL paid back, do you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fire1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-25-10 09:35 PM Response to Reply #59 |
61. Let's not answer a quesion with a question. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jim Sagle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-25-10 10:53 PM Response to Reply #61 |
77. Your question wasn't worth answering in the first place. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fire1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-25-10 11:08 PM Response to Reply #77 |
79. Whether you consider it a stick up is not the point. It had to be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jim Sagle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-25-10 11:34 PM Response to Reply #79 |
81. Just because you pretend to think it had to be done, doesn't mean it ACTUALLY had to be done. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fire1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-26-10 09:36 PM Response to Reply #81 |
107. That is your OPINION and thankfully that's all it is. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jim Sagle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-27-10 02:38 AM Response to Reply #107 |
113. My opinion, shared by anybody with a clue. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
donco6 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-25-10 10:28 PM Response to Reply #46 |
72. Free use of trillions of dollars? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fire1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-25-10 10:42 PM Response to Reply #72 |
74. Elaborate, please. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
donco6 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-25-10 10:44 PM Response to Reply #74 |
75. The use of money is never free. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fire1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-25-10 10:49 PM Response to Reply #75 |
76. Are you referring to TARP funds that were repaid? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
donco6 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-25-10 10:27 PM Response to Reply #28 |
71. Well, finally some honesty. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-25-10 08:15 PM Response to Original message |
27. If by really good, he means tireless efforts at bipartisan and blue dog consensus building |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fire1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-25-10 08:44 PM Response to Reply #27 |
44. I think all of us can agree on that. Even the supporters. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheCowsCameHome (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-25-10 08:18 PM Response to Original message |
29. He may get his wish.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-25-10 08:19 PM Response to Reply #29 |
30. Yeah, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harun (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-26-10 08:57 AM Response to Reply #29 |
95. If he doesn't throw progrssives at least one bone, he will most certainly get his wish. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lynne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-25-10 08:20 PM Response to Original message |
31. "Really Good" presidents normally sail into the second term - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laugle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-25-10 09:13 PM Response to Reply #31 |
51. He will |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rateyes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-25-10 08:24 PM Response to Original message |
32. Better late than never. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rateyes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-25-10 08:27 PM Response to Original message |
34. Why doesn't he start by cleaning house of the mediocrity in his administration? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-25-10 08:34 PM Response to Reply #34 |
37. Maybe, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slipslidingaway (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-25-10 08:46 PM Response to Reply #34 |
47. And Summers was there when Brooksley Born wanted more regulation... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
avaistheone1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-26-10 03:24 AM Response to Reply #47 |
88. Yes, yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slipslidingaway (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-26-10 05:36 PM Response to Reply #88 |
103. :) thanks n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zbdent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-25-10 08:41 PM Response to Original message |
40. At least Clinton was elected to his two terms ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clio the Leo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-25-10 08:41 PM Response to Original message |
41. That's one of my favorite Obama spins ever... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Oregone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-25-10 08:45 PM Response to Original message |
45. Maybe neither is in the works |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NorthCarolina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-25-10 09:26 PM Response to Reply #45 |
58. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jillan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-25-10 09:47 PM Response to Reply #45 |
63. +2 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
last1standing (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-25-10 09:12 PM Response to Original message |
50. Right now it'd be an uphill fight for mediocre. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-25-10 09:14 PM Response to Reply #50 |
53. Teh Prezident Suks. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
last1standing (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-25-10 09:18 PM Response to Reply #53 |
55. From your fingers... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
asdjrocky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-25-10 09:14 PM Response to Original message |
52. In his second year in office he'll end hunger. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dave29 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-25-10 09:17 PM Response to Reply #52 |
54. naw, he'll just get beat up for not ending hunger |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-25-10 09:19 PM Response to Reply #52 |
56. Actually, he |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
caraher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-25-10 09:24 PM Response to Original message |
57. In the spirit of bipartisan compromise |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VMI Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-25-10 09:51 PM Response to Original message |
64. Does that mean he will suprise us all and walk back his bigoted rhetoric in the near future? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Phoebe Loosinhouse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-25-10 09:52 PM Response to Original message |
65. Well, it's not T Roosevelt or FDR anymore, now the comparisons are, Carter or Hoover? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-25-10 09:55 PM Response to Reply #65 |
67. A lot of people don't see it, and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Phoebe Loosinhouse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-25-10 09:58 PM Response to Reply #67 |
68. I think your link may be broken. I'm not seeing what it links to. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-25-10 10:02 PM Response to Reply #68 |
70. "It couldn't possibly be another thread of your own, could it?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Feron (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-25-10 10:53 PM Response to Reply #65 |
78. Well so far, I'm guessing Hoover. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HopeOverFear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-25-10 09:53 PM Response to Original message |
66. I knew the topic of this thread would attract sarcastically spewed bile and vitriol |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
donco6 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-25-10 10:30 PM Response to Reply #66 |
73. It's been egged on purposefully by some sycophants. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
applegrove (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-25-10 11:13 PM Response to Original message |
80. Good thing to say and remember. You go Obama. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
donheld (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-26-10 12:43 AM Response to Original message |
82. Then why is he doing everything he can to be a mediocre one termer? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueIris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-26-10 01:03 AM Response to Original message |
83. I was wondering when he'd get around to admitting it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hippo_Tron (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-26-10 01:54 AM Response to Original message |
84. Due Respect Mr. President, I don't believe that for a second |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vidar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-26-10 02:35 AM Response to Original message |
86. He's off to a piss poor start. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skittles (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-26-10 04:08 AM Response to Original message |
89. translation: I don't give a shit what liberals think |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ganja Ninja (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-26-10 06:55 AM Response to Original message |
90. ‘mediocre two-term president.’ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberal N proud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-26-10 07:24 AM Response to Original message |
91. He has said that more than once |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
old mark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-26-10 07:51 AM Response to Original message |
93. Not too late to start now.....nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadHound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-26-10 08:21 AM Response to Original message |
94. Trobule is the way he's going he's going to wind up the worst of both worlds |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-26-10 09:16 AM Response to Original message |
96. Spoken like a true politician!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TankLV (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-26-10 09:19 AM Response to Original message |
97. If he was "mediocre" - that would be a STEP UP!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruggerson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-26-10 09:35 AM Response to Original message |
98. So he's saying the American public wouldn't recognize a "really" good President |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
David Zephyr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-26-10 09:39 PM Response to Reply #98 |
108. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
woo me with science (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-26-10 10:01 PM Response to Reply #98 |
110. Bingo. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
freddie mertz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-26-10 10:29 AM Response to Original message |
102. Nonsense. "I never campaigned on the public option." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-26-10 05:46 PM Response to Reply #102 |
104. "The president has a tendency to throw words" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gkhouston (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-26-10 07:55 PM Response to Reply #102 |
106. Perhaps he meant, "I never campaigned *for* the public option". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
theothersnippywshrub (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-26-10 07:50 PM Response to Original message |
105. Neither is likely, or even plausible at this point. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jeanpalmer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-26-10 10:17 PM Response to Original message |
112. My god this guy is hopelessly lost |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
democracy1st (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-27-10 02:42 AM Response to Reply #112 |
114. What a weak weak man so sad! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Strawman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-27-10 11:55 AM Response to Original message |
115. Get Biden and 50 Senators to end the filibuster then |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truebrit71 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-27-10 02:42 PM Response to Original message |
116. At the rate he is going he will be neither... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:44 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC