Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Anyone noticed who was missing in action from the Supreme Court

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
bigdarryl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 10:55 AM
Original message
Anyone noticed who was missing in action from the Supreme Court
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FSogol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
1. Thomas and Scalia. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. They were busy playing "Find The Pube." n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #3
16. lol
You bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
prole_for_peace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #1
11. My brother said Thomas and Scalia weren't there because
they don't like being in the same room with black people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Funniest post today! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
2. Yes...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GMA Donating Member (467 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
4. Given what happened last night, I'd be surprised
if any of the Court show up next year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FSogol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. BS. Reagan called the Court out over School Prayer and there wasn't any (p)outrage. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harkadog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #7
17. BS. The school prayer cases were decided in 1962
Long before Reagan was on the scene.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FSogol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. BS, back at you. Here's the exact Reagan quote:
Edited on Thu Jan-28-10 01:09 PM by FSogol
"And let me add here: so many of our greatest statesmen have reminded us that spiritual values alone are essential to our nation's health and vigor. The Congress opens its proceedings each day, as does the Supreme Court, with an acknowledgment of the Supreme Being -- yet we are denied the right to set aside in our schools a moment each day for those who wish to pray. I believe Congress should pass our school prayer amendment." Reagan 1/25/1988

The scumbag's full SOTU address is posted here: http://www.let.rug.nl/usa/P/rr40/speeches/su88rwr.htm

Reagan spend a lot of time griping that the Court had upheld a ban on school prayer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harkadog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #19
25. BS back at you too. Reagan was asking Congress to pass
an amendment. He was not criticizing a recent SC decision. Try again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #7
18. Reagan example not a good one. Better example is FDR
In his 1988 SOTU, Reagan called for amendments to restrict abortion and to allow school prayer, but he wasn't calling out the current court for a specific recent decision that it had made. In fact, none of the members of the court involved in the decisions establishing that school prayer violated the Constitution were on the court in 1988 and only three of the seven justices that were in the majority in Roe were still on the court.

A better example is FDR's 1937 SOTU, which did not name the "Supreme Court" but criticized the "Judiciary" and the "Courts" for failing to adopting interpretations of the Constitution that were preventing the Executive and Legislative branch from taking necessary action to address the Great Depression. Not long thereafter, of course, FDR gave a fireside chat in which he called out the SCOTUS even more specifically, proposing legislation to change the composition of the court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FSogol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Long time ago, but wasn't the ban on School Prayer upheld
by the Court in 1987? IIRC, it was a big issue during the elections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. nope. There was a case (moment of silence) in 1985.
Again -- not really "recent" in the way that the Citizens United case was recent or the cases that led FDR to criticize the court were recent when he spoke
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alsame Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
5. They were home counting all the bribe money they got from the
corporations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
6. Thomas.
Edited on Thu Jan-28-10 11:04 AM by Jennicut
Alito was there since he muttered at the President. Roberts was there as well. Scalia did not show up either?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhiteTara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
8. no, who?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rurallib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
9. probably in church praying for the county's salvation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. And rubbing sandpaper on their tender bits in homage to Opus Dei.
Roberts and Alito had to wait until they got home later.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DarthDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
10. Scalia, Thomas, and Stevens

I thought it was too bad that Stevens wasn't there, because he might well (secretly) have enjoyed the slapdown. Breyer certainly looked like he was pleased.

I guess Scalia and his faithful running buddy had Cheneyian "other priorities."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tigereye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #10
21. Stevens filed a fiery dissent - you are probably right...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #10
23. scalia never attends. In fact, not attending is pretty common
I posted a list of SCOTUS attendees up in the thread. Only Breyer consistently attends. THree times he's been the only Justice to attend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
13. Actually, SCOTUS attendance at the SOTU was par for the course
It has been a long time (if ever) that all of the SCOTUS justices appeared at the SOTU. In fact, Scalia has never come to one during his time on the court. Breyer is the only consistent attendee. He missed in 2000, when none of the Court showed up. Since then he's attended every SOTU -- three times he was the only Justice in attendance. Here is a list of those Justices who have attended in recent years:

2008: Roberts, Breyer, Alito, Kennedy
2007: Roberts, Breyer, Alito, Kennedy
2006: Roberts, Thomas, Breyer, Alito
2005: Stevens, Breyer
2004: Breyer
2003: Breyer
2002: Kennedy, Breyer
2001: Breyer
2000: None (due to illnesses and travel conflicts)
1999: O'Connor, Kennedy, Souter, Thomas, Ginsberg, Breyer
1998: Rehnquist, O'Connor, Souter, Thomas, Breyer
1997: Scalia, Kennedy, Souter, Thomas, Ginsberg, Breyer, White (retired)
1996: Rehnquist, O'Connor, Kennedy, Thomas, Ginsberg, Breyer
1995: Rehnquist, O'Connor, Scalia, Ginsberg, Breyer, Blackmun (retired)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DarthDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #13
26. Thank You!

That's really interesting, and totally contrary to what I would have guessed and thought I remembered. Figures that Dollar Bill Rehnquist, the Chief Justice of the United States, couldn't be bothered to go, pretty much ever. Maybe the "oratory" of the idiot he helped install pained him too much? Same with Ginsberg and, except for 2005, Stevens (minus the helping to install part as to both, of course).

Where did you find this? *Great* stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. Link:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CK_John Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
14. Several are missing on purpose to form a new government in case of disaster. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FSogol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #14
24. Then Scalia's attendance should be mandatory. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #14
27. No, that's just for a token cabinet secretary (it was Clinton's turn last night)
The new government Scalia and Thomas are off working on is the one GE, Halliburton, and Black Water want to install once they figure out a fool proof plan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. Clinton was not the designated "survivor"
The designated cabinet member was Shaun Donovan (secretary of HUD). While Clinton was not in attendance she couldn't be the designated "survivor" attendee because, by custom, that person has to be in the US and available immediately to take control of the government in the event it was deemed necessary to do so. (ALthough, oddly, that "custom" conflicts with the law which provides the order of succession and puts the Secretary of State well ahead of the HUD Secretary).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. This guy?
If terrorists blow up the Congress, would this geek really be able to heal the nation?



Maybe they should only let Arne Duncan sit out the SOTUs from now on. Or Hillary--she'd do in a pinch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uzybone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
31. Justice Stevens, probably too disgusted to be seen in public
with the corporate 5
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. Justice Stevens never attends the SOTU
Certain justices, including both Scalia and Stevens, never attend the SOTU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC