Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

You know, I thought Clinton was going to be an unpopular one-termer after his first year.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 10:23 PM
Original message
You know, I thought Clinton was going to be an unpopular one-termer after his first year.
I'm just saying.....


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Yurovsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. I can't see BHO losing in 2012...
unless he REALLY pisses off the base of the party. Sure folks like myself haven't gotten a lot of what we want this past year, but if the choice in 2012 is BHO or Sarah Frickin' Palin, who in their right mind would stay home out of spite? Not even the most dedicated progressive would want to punish a Democratic President by electing a slow-witted gun nut to the Oval Office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I see him losing seats in Senate/House but he'll win in 2012....
I think he has alot of potential. 2009 was alot of growing pains and honestly, I highly doubt any one of us could have done better even if we posted her in DU that we could.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yurovsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. It's exceeding rare that the party in power doesnt', plus...
the Dem majorities in both houses are so enormous that they simply have more seats to be lost. Not many GOP seats to take, and many that remain are solidly in inbred/banjo-land.

You can get things done with a smaller majority, and it might even be easier if some of the blue dogs/DINOs get "retired", as the caucus will be more cohesive. Going to take some bare-knuckle tactics in dealing with the folks across the aisle though. You can talk nice in public, but you better kick some ass behind closed doors. And what might be difficult to do legislatively needs to be done (when possible) via executive order. Don't be hemmed in by th opposition, they're certainly not trying to help you succeed...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 11:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. If the economy doesn't improve, it could happen.
Patience will run out before November of 2012
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. FDR got reelected
Different times, though. Still, the not changing horses in midstream kind of thinking takes over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jonnyblitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. some of us are more concerned with the issues than we are
with popularity contests. who cares if the DEM is popular if he is escalating war and favoring the wealthy. I'm just saying...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Hopefully, one of those issues is whether a President appoints SCOTUS nominees like Alito or
Sotomayer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
5. If we lose Congress this year Obama will probably win in 2012
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SomeGuyInEagan Donating Member (872 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
6. Well, Clinton wasn't the *worst* president of my adult life ...
Edited on Thu Jan-28-10 10:39 PM by SomeGuyInEagan
After all, until Obama, the presidents since I got the right to vote has also included Reagan, Bush I and Bush II.

I was *really* hoping for something much, much, MUCH better than another Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DFLforever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 12:15 AM
Response to Original message
9. Clinton made a lot more mistakes in his first year than Obama
and got off to a very rocky start with his appointments, etc. And Clinton came in when the Republicans were ascendant at the national level.
Plus no Democrat since FDR had actually been elected to a second term.
So I can see why we might have had doubts.

But I don't see many parallels between the two presidents. Except neither appears to have had a formidable opponent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC