Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

VP Joe Biden: The President's Nuclear Vision

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 07:29 PM
Original message
VP Joe Biden: The President's Nuclear Vision
The President's Nuclear Vision
We will spend what is necessary to maintain the safety, security and effectiveness of our weapons.

By JOE BIDEN


The United States faces no greater threat than the spread of nuclear weapons. That is why, last April in Prague, President Obama laid out a comprehensive agenda to reverse their spread, and to pursue the peace and security of a world without them.

He understands that this ultimate goal will not be reached quickly. But by acting on a number of fronts, we can ensure our security, strengthen the global nonproliferation regime, and keep vulnerable nuclear material out of terrorist hands.

For as long as nuclear weapons are required to defend our country and our allies, we will maintain a safe, secure and effective nuclear arsenal. The president's Prague vision is central to this administration's efforts to protect the American people—and that is why we are increasing investments in our nuclear arsenal and infrastructure in this year's budget and beyond.

Among the many challenges our administration inherited was the slow but steady decline in support for our nuclear stockpile and infrastructure, and for our highly trained nuclear work force. The stockpile, infrastructure and work force played a critical and evolving role in every stage of our nuclear experience, from the Manhattan Project to the present day. Once charged with developing ever more powerful weapons, they have had a new mission in the 18 years since we stopped conducting nuclear tests. That is to maintain the strength of the nuclear arsenal.

For almost a decade, our laboratories and facilities have been underfunded and undervalued. The consequences of this neglect—like the growing shortage of skilled nuclear scientists and engineers and the aging of critical facilities—have largely escaped public notice. Last year, the Strategic Posture Commission led by former Defense Secretaries William Perry and James Schlesinger warned that our nuclear complex requires urgent attention. We agree.

The budget we will submit to Congress on Monday both reverses this decline and enables us to implement the president's nuclear-security agenda. These goals are intertwined. The same skilled nuclear experts who maintain our arsenal play a key role in guaranteeing our country's security now and for the future. State-of-the art facilities, and highly trained and motivated people, allow us to maintain our arsenal without testing. They will help meet the president's goal of securing vulnerable nuclear materials world-wide in the coming years, and enable us to track and thwart nuclear trafficking, verify weapons reductions, and to develop tomorrow's cutting-edge technologies for our security and prosperity.

more...

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704878904575031382215508268.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. The man is doing SO many positive things...
.... in the face of SO many obstacles .... it's hard to take it all in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. Excuse me.
Edited on Fri Jan-29-10 07:46 PM by avaistheone1
But I thought we were supposed to me toning down our nuclear program along with Russia.

Furthermore, given we spend more on defense than all the rest of the world put together, it seem like we are only are threat to ourselves as our wasteful spending in the defense area is bankrupting this country.

Instead, when are we going to start feeding the one in five Americans who are hungry in this country, and ensure that no American has do die has a result of the lack of health care. Let's be honest these are the real threats not adding to our nuclear arsenal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. We're in talks with Russia about arms reduction...
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/01/27/AR2010012703709.html

Do you honestly think they're the only potential threat?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Given we have more nuclear weapons than anyone on the planet,
Edited on Fri Jan-29-10 07:58 PM by avaistheone1
and given we the only country that I know who has ever used them, I think there really are no threats to us that could justify this investment on our part at this time.

Aren't we the major power who has employed wars of aggression against the UN charter in Middle East in last decade, or am I mistaken?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Take it up with people smarter than myself; they feel justified in having
a plan, I'm okay with that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. How do you know they are smarter than yourself?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. disregard
Edited on Fri Jan-29-10 08:28 PM by HiFructosePronSyrup
Silly season.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
5. About time.
It's been a bit of an open secret that the maintenance and future expertise has been at risk for a while now, and the *last* thing we need is an active stockpile with nobody who knows how to take care of it, dismantle it, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
8. I feel confident that we'll be moving in the right direction. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Because why?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Because I trust Obama and Biden. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. So anything they say is correct like clean coal etc?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Whoa - did I say that? I thought the discussion was about the nuclear situation.
Did your mind wander?

For what it's worth, I think "clean coal" is an oxymoron.

Look, it's not worth the back and forth here. I feel like I do, and you feel as you do. We're not going to change each other's minds, so let's spread our wisdom elsewhere.

But please, don't assume because I express an opinion on one topic, that you know how I feel about other issues.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. I think my question was reasonable given your response:
Edited on Fri Jan-29-10 08:36 PM by avaistheone1
"Because I trust Obama and Biden".

As you wish please do carry on elsewhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC