Graham claims use of reconciliation for health reform ‘would be catastrophic’

[depakid]

Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC) has either a tack for exaggeration or a faltering memory, if his conclusion about the use of reconciliation during a Sunday television appearance is any indicator of such things.

His comments on CBS' Face the Nation seemed to echo other Republicans who've been attempting to frame the 51-vote parliamentary device as some kind of radical usurpation of democracy, almost akin to “ripping a piece of the fabric of America off," according to Sen. Richard Burr (R-NC).

"It would be catastrophic," Graham claimed, comparing the pending reconciliation vote on health reform to Republicans triggering the so-called "nuclear option" to ban filibusters over President Bush's judicial nominees. Graham also claimed, "we've had reconciliation votes, but all of them have had bipartisan support. The least was 12 when we did reconciliation with tax cuts."

"Graham’s claim that 'the least' amount of Democratic votes a GOP reconciliation bill received 'was 12' is flat out false," Matt Corley noted over at Think Progress. "As The Wonk Room’s Igor Volsky has detailed, during the Bush presidency, the Republican-controlled Senate passed three reconciliation bills with three or less Democratic votes. The 2003 Bush tax cuts were supported by only two Democrats and needed Vice President Dick Cheney’s tie-breaking vote to pass."
Story continues below...

Republicans have been scolded in recent weeks by the Senate's Democratic leadership for making wild exaggerations about the use of reconciliation. Sen. Harry Reid (D-NV) slammed opposition lawmakers as being entitled to their opinions, but "not your own facts."

The Senate leader noted that his party has made various concessions to GOP health care demands, only to be continually rebuffed at every turn. He pointedly blamed Republicans for playing fast and loose with the truth. "So let's look at the facts a little bit more, because they can be stubborn, you know."

Republicans have used reconciliation 17 times in the last 30 years: in 1980, 1982, 1983, 1985, 1986, 1987, 1989, 1990, 1993, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2003 and 2005, according to MSNBC.

More: http://rawstory.com/2010/03/sen-graham-claims-reconciliation-would-catastrophic/

[glowing]

1. Uhh. Catesrophic for him.

[liberal N proud]

2. More fear mongering from the right

It is always catastrophic when the GOP is on the losing side

[Jennicut]

3. Throwing things at the wall again to see if they stick.

They will try anything because they are getting more desperate.

[annabanana]

4. Hey Graham.. - What you mean WE Kimosabe?

[RandomThoughts]

5. 'Fast and Loose' is an Eddie Felson comment that is more about

playing by feel not about deception. I don't think it applies to the conversation in my view.

[Clio the Leo]

6. Anyone else catch his flub yesterday?

He said, "let's score a field goal, not a touch down..."

And there you have it, passing the HCR bill is the political equivalent of scoring 6 (or probably more like 18, but there's no triple touchdowns in football sadly.)

Yeah, if the bill was crap, they'd grab the ball and put it in for us.

[ncteechur]

7. He only says that because McCain said it first. He has such a crush.

[JoePhilly]

8. F**K him.

[apnu]

9. What an ass, Ronnie RayGun got most of his "great compromise" though with reconciliation. (nt)

[SeattleGirl]

10. Jeebus Christ on a crutch, but the Republicans are all a bunch of

crybabies and drama queens.

[AlinPA]

11. Graham and Lieberman are working together to advance the republican agenda. nt