|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-08-10 02:47 PM Original message |
Specter: Democrats getting 'angry,' will pass healthcare bill |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rockymountaindem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-08-10 02:48 PM Response to Original message |
1. Any time here people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-08-10 02:49 PM Response to Original message |
2. The Democratic "leaders" don't know ANGRY unless they pass this shitty mandated Senate Bill. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thereismore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-08-10 02:51 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. Mandates are necessary. The question is, will the cost be controlled. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-08-10 02:53 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. No, without SINGLE PAYER, mandates are "corporate welfare" to the Insurance Cartel. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thereismore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-08-10 04:21 PM Response to Reply #4 |
11. Single payer has a mandate. It is covered through taxes that everybody is mandated to pay. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hello_Kitty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-09-10 12:00 AM Response to Reply #11 |
23. No it's not semantics. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thereismore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-09-10 10:56 AM Response to Reply #23 |
29. Yes of course, but single payer has a mandate hidden in taxes. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hello_Kitty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-09-10 12:20 PM Response to Reply #29 |
30. No shit. But it's a lot less money and not going directly to a corporation to skim 30%. eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thereismore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-09-10 02:35 PM Response to Reply #30 |
31. Like I don't know that! No bad feelings, but Kitty I know all that. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hansel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-08-10 08:00 PM Response to Reply #2 |
16. You'll be angry. A hell of a lot of other people won't. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cliffordu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-09-10 01:43 AM Response to Reply #2 |
28. Well... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluestateguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-08-10 02:53 PM Response to Original message |
5. Thank Joe Sestak for making a good Democrat out of Specter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-08-10 02:58 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. Remember when we bailed out the banksters? This is covertly as atrocious and obscene. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tridim (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-08-10 03:12 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. ATROCIOUS! OBSCENE! CON JOB! NO BENEFITS! MANDATES! OBVIOUS RUSE! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rufus dog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-08-10 03:40 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. I was sold with the all CAPS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
movonne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-08-10 03:48 PM Response to Reply #6 |
10. do you have a solution?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LaydeeBug (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-08-10 07:20 PM Response to Reply #10 |
15. Lower the age of eligibility for Medicare to birth, then we operate at 3 - 7 % |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnaries (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-08-10 10:42 PM Response to Reply #6 |
18. Once again, you have proven that you are "fiery" but still clueless. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hekate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-09-10 12:06 AM Response to Reply #18 |
24. comin' up short? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clio the Leo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-08-10 07:10 PM Response to Reply #5 |
14. Nope, Joe Biden made a good Democrat out of Specter. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlinPA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-08-10 10:08 PM Response to Reply #5 |
17. If he wins in November, I think he will switch back to R. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueIdaho (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-08-10 03:47 PM Response to Original message |
9. Health care reform will pass - soon |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
philly_bob (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-08-10 06:30 PM Response to Original message |
12. Specter's a seasoned political observer. I think he's reacting to a real change |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clio the Leo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-08-10 07:06 PM Response to Original message |
13. WE need to get angry too! I'm channeling my inner pit bull...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
w4rma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-08-10 10:44 PM Response to Original message |
19. This bill will *suck* like NAFTA sucks without a Public Option. Include it! (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnaries (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-08-10 10:47 PM Response to Reply #19 |
20. Well, we are slowly building support for the PO. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
w4rma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-08-10 10:56 PM Response to Reply #20 |
22. It's the same. Clinton sold NAFTA telling us he'd fix it later. Obama is doing the same thing on the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Divine Discontent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-09-10 12:23 AM Response to Reply #22 |
26. exactly! now or obviously it'll NEVER get fixed properly. we SEE how bad it is getting through this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnaries (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-10-10 09:23 PM Response to Reply #22 |
32. No. Absolutely not! NAFTA sucked even in basic concept. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnaries (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-08-10 10:54 PM Response to Original message |
21. I'm still a little leery of Spector. I will admit that when he was a |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zoeisright (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-09-10 12:10 AM Response to Original message |
25. It's about fucking time they get 'angry'. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calimary (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-09-10 12:28 AM Response to Reply #25 |
27. No kidding. I've been seething quietly since the ongoing persecution of Clinton, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat Jan 04th 2025, 09:02 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC