Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pelosi: Say Goodbye To The Public Option (because the Senate doesn't have the votes ) - updated

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 11:50 AM
Original message
Pelosi: Say Goodbye To The Public Option (because the Senate doesn't have the votes ) - updated
Edited on Fri Mar-12-10 12:12 PM by ProSense

Pelosi: Say Goodbye To The Public Option

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi declared the public option dead during a press briefing moments ago.

"We're talking about something that's not going to be part of the legislation," she said.

I'm quite sad that a public option isn't in there. But it isn't a case of it's not in there because the Senate is whipping against it. It's not in there because they don't have the votes to have it in there."We had it," Pelosi said. "We wanted it. They didn't have it. It's not in the reconciliation."


So Durbin says he'll whip for it, Senators are making claims that up to 53 votes exists and now Pelosi says "we wanted it" but "they don't have the votes"?

Sounds like either a lack of coordination or a lot of excuses.

Updated to add:

Pelosi gave solace to supporters of the public option, saying that its intent will largely be fulfilled with other provisions in the bill.

"While it may not have a public option, we have a purpose of the public option served by the exchanges" and other reforms, she said.

link




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
1. How/where does Grayson's resolution fit into all this? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. It may well be that this is Grayson's effort and is not that of the leadership
It is highly likely that it will not be brought to the floor and that it will not have anywhere near the votes needed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
themaguffin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
31. I expected the Medicare idea to resurface again before this week & expect
that it has a better chance of success. After all, it almost had 60 Senate votes, so it's realistic to get 50 and the House could more ahead knowing that.

I don't blame Nancy for feeling burned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigdarryl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
2. Can anyone post those Senators so they can be PREMIERED
Edited on Fri Mar-12-10 11:54 AM by bigdarryl
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #2
15. Premiered?
Tah Dah!


I think you mean primaried. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
closeupready Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
3. Anyone who didn't see this coming is an idiot.
Edited on Fri Mar-12-10 11:55 AM by closeupready
There is going to be no public option, no medicare buy-in, and we are stuck with insurance mandates for all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. You are right on. and those in Congress who believe they are doing the prudent thing
I suspect will be in for a big surprise when they are up for election

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Actually, there are many people who want the bill passed with or without a public option
but that doesn't mean they are going to stop pushing for it, even after the bill passes.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
closeupready Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. And they will fix NAFTA, while they are at it.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Maybe. Do you know for sure that they will not?
Are you expecting Congress to disband after this vote?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Thanks - that sucks. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabatha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Krugman says it is a good bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bryn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #3
25. I knew it was too good to be true!
Yet I hoped. :(

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
denimgirly Donating Member (929 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
11. EXPECTED. Cenk was right..Smoke and Mirrors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 12:35 PM
Original message
NEGATIVITY EXPECTED
Edited on Fri Mar-12-10 12:35 PM by HughMoran
You've quickly become a caricature for the negativity crew.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JTFrog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
22. Easier the second or third time around. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lost4words Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
12. I'm feeling stupid just holding onto hope, if it were a phony war it would be done by now
head exploding!...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bryn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
13. It should be illegal for politicians to take money from corporations
I am not sure if the reason is because of money coming in from insurance companies to keep out Public Option, but I wouldn't be surprised if it was.

When they get paid by insurance companies, big pharma companies, etc. to vote against us they are messing up America and American people. They can't get their priorities straightened because of their greed for their own wealth. Might as well get rid of ALL POLITICIANS and let The Corporation run America!

Take a look at Blanche Lincoln. She's one of the worst democrats and the biggest corporation whore.

From a MoveOn.org fundraising email:

Blanche Lincoln is one of the worst corporate Democrats in Washington. That's why 92 percent of Arkansas MoveOn members voted to support Bill Halter over Blanche Lincoln in a primary election. Instead of fighting for the health care reform Arkansas families desperately need, she took nearly a million ($866,000) from Big Insurance and HMO interests and then played a leading role in opposing the public health insurance option. She took $1.3 million from Wall Street banks and helped kill legislation that would've allowed struggling homeowners to stay in their homes. And she sponsored a bill to roll back the Clean Air Act to protect corporate profits. With Bill Halter, our Arkansas members see a candidate who will stand up to special interests. Arkansans deserve someone who'll fight for them, not Wall Street.


Blanche Lincoln, D-Senator of Arkansas. She ignores people that need health care to pocket $866,000. Took $1.3 million from Wall Street banks not to fight to keep homeowers stay in their homes. She weakens the Clear Air Act for Arkansas. She took $162,202 from utilities since 2005 (according to data from the Center for Responsive Politics.)

Can anyone see the root of a real problem in the Whitehouse? It's the politicians taking money from corporations to protect The Corporation interest and for themselves to enjoy the wealth. It's like stealing from Us The People. It's crime, but it's LEGAL. We the People should fight to make it illegal. It's unethical and so morally wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
closeupready Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. What I don't get, how are we supposed to fight for reform - by contacting Blanche Lincoln?
Or fill in the blank with your own elected official? What I mean is, they are ALL on the take. Don't look to current elected officials to reform the same broken system that enriches them personally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bryn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. I mentioned Blanche Lincoln as an example ...
There are many in the Whitehouse just like her .... taking money from the corporations to vote to protect corporations' interests. Much like mobster system. "Pay me and I will protect you."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
closeupready Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. No disagreement from me on any of your points.
Frankly, I think this is all very obvious. But maybe I think that simply because I'm more attuned to these types of current affairs?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
14. Pelsoi also noted the HHS Sec power to regulate rates and behaving so they can be on the exchanges.
Edited on Fri Mar-12-10 12:28 PM by flpoljunkie
These measures will save costs--altho perhaps not as much as a strong public option-which we never had in the House, in any case.

Bernie Sanders is answering questions on Thom Hartmann's radio show LIVE at this moment.

http://www.thomhartmann.com/listenlive.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinnie From Indy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
17. You can almost hear the champagne corks flying in the executive offices of Wellpoint et al
It has been quite an awesome thing to behold the transformation of the US Congress into nothing but a group streetwalkers working for their big pimp daddy the health insurance industry/Big Pharma.

This bill is everything the health insurers ever dreamed of having but were too afraid to ask. Under the guise of "reform" they have scored a victory that will ring through the ages. I will not be surprised at all if they also get the last remaining items on their wish list including draconian tort reform/caps/limits and the ability to sell across state lines.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Yeah, as they spend millions more to try to kill it and are gearing
up to work with the GOP on their bogus attempt to repeal it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jersey Devil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
20. Of course - it would be ridiculous for the House to include it in the reconciliation bill
If they did include it, passed it and there weren't enough votes for it in the Senate then we'd be back to square one again - no bill of any kind. Pelosi isn't saying "goodbye" to the PO because the Senate never said "hello" to it.

If there was ever any chance of a PO being added back in it has to originate in the Senate. Then it could be sent back to the House and quickly approved. The House adding into a recon bill would be courting disaster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. Thank you. The Senate does not have 50 votes or more. No way, no how.
Anyone want to take a guess at the ones who are a no go besides the obvious conservadems? Webb and Warner? Carper?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. True, but then that makes Durbin's statement ridiculous. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jersey Devil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. Yeah, Durban will "whip it"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imajika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
27. The Public Option has been dead for months...
...that so many people deluded themselves into believing there was a serious push on for it is sad.

So much naivete. It's politics people. Many of those Senators "signing on" to the PO were just doing so because they knew it was already dead. They were just appeasing the base. That is just how things are done. The real decisions had already been made.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. It is obvious now why Obama never demanded it, he knew it
would never be in there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. Obama never wanted the Public Option
That is the unspoken truth, and the great unmentionable in DU. The Baucus bill is the bill that Obama wanted!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hulka38 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. It may be dangerous to try to wake people like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
closeupready Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. Sort of like those who waited for Gore's Shermanesque statement.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Jan 04th 2025, 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC