Lindsey Graham is an angry white man with a lot of hate.

[LiberalFighter]

He is on "This Week".

[NRaleighLiberal]

Maybe there are a few things he needs to get off of his chest.

[MrMickeysMom]

4. No, no... nothing to get off his chest...

and, nothing to reap from his "mind" either. Just more of the same. Better you should turn on the travel channel...

[SharonAnn]

6. I think he's an angry, gay, white man who isin the closet.. Just my opinion.

[RedRoses323]

7. Yep

I've always thought that as well....

[MrMickeysMom]

10. I was going to suggest that, as well...

But, sometimes, that pisses off DU members. It should NOT matter if he's gay, but the quality of people who lie their asses off. We've seen over and over again how many of them disguise themselves as Christians and oh, so heterosexual in the Republican party.

How lame is that?

[donco6]

14. It only pisses me off when people figure -

if someone's evil, they must be Republican . . . but to be superDUPER evil, they have to be gay AND Republican.

I mean, being compared to Satan on a weekly basis is enough, but that is just nasty.

[MrMickeysMom]

17. Gotcha, donco6...

:-)

[NRaleighLiberal]

12. I don't watch TV. Sundays for me are nice breakfast, Sunday NY Times and gardening.

I can't pollute my brain with the shit that is 99% of TV

[glowing]

1. If he had grown up in the NE, he may have been a man who didn't hate himself.

[tularetom]

2. Sure he is - it's uncomfortable in that closet he's in

[tallahasseedem]

3. He's a classic...

angry closed case.

[zulchzulu]

5. He's just jealous because he never got a Massa Massage n/t

[old mark]

8. ...and the REAL RWers think he's a "liberal"....nt

[chieftain]

9. He is an angry white man who does not have enough hate

for the RW and his party.

[Vinca]

11. An angry white man with bad grammar.

He actually said "Joe Lieberman was ran out of the Democrat Party."

[BlueIdaho]

13. Yeah - he'd rather be the snorkelee rather than the snorkeler...

But you can't always get what you want.

[karynnj]

15. His main message that HCR will end bipartisanship actually is an idle threat

First off, there is little bipartisanship happening.

Second, he says he believes in the work he is doing with Kerry and Lieberman on energy/climate change and that he believes in the work that he is doing with Schumer on immigration. What changes on those issues if HCR passes? Nothing. So, he is saying that he will simply sit and pout if HCR passes.

What was really needed was that instead of it being Jake Tapper throwing him softballs, they needed a Democrat next to him - to challange comments that he likely doesn't mean. (In 2008, Kerry often got him to backtrack or, if he kept insisting a nervous tic took over his eye.) I assume Schumer might have been able to do the same,

[Orsino]

16. Don't mistake what passes between Graham's lips for what he really feels.

What you see on the TV is just a political stance, and Graham's requires that we hate.